Two Cornerbacks Make Great Fits for the Packers in Early Rounds

Should the Packers select a cornerback early in the 2025 draft, two players in particular fit the bill (and the scheme).

With uncertainty around star cornerback Jaire Alexander, the Green Bay Packers are faced with a fork-in-the-road moment in their cornerback room.

Keisean Nixon outperformed expectations moving outside after spending 2023 in the slot and rightfully secured a starting role next season on the boundary. But the Packers still have questions to be answered for their other boundary corner spot, even if Alexander were to return.

Unfortunately, the Eric Stokes experience has enough writing on the wall at this point, and he doesn't seem likely to be around long term. And while Carrington Valentine certainly brings a lot of promise to the table still, the Packers could very well afford to dabble in a premier corner in the draft who could compete for a starting role.

Worst case, two starting caliber cornerbacks battle for one job, the best man comes out as starter, and the top of their depth is a player who will still play meaningful snaps but is waiting in the wings to take over at a moments notice.

The Packers without Jaire are otherwise fairly slim at cornerback depth, so regardless of who ends up starting, they could use a jolt to the top of their depth chart. 

Javon Bullard will need to make strides in coverage, but his contributions playing up at the line of scrimmage have more than earned him a starting slot role next season. It's unlikely Green Bay is looking to bring in someone to compete for Bullard's snaps.

Given the need at outside cornerback, there are two players in this year's class who would make the most sense for Green Bay to target early, who will compete for a starting role, and worst case, will still get plenty of meaningful snaps right off the bat.

Trey Amos - Ole Miss

At 6'0, 190 pounds, go ahead and check the Packers' boxes for measurables with Trey Amos.

Originally a product of the Sun Belt Conference, Amos made the jump to the SEC and casually went on to be a top corner in arguably the most competitive conference in college football.

Right away, what's noticeable about Amos is how he effectively uses his size and length to his advantage, specifically in press coverage and at the catch point.

This past season, Amos allowed a measly 54.5 passer rating when targeted, registered an 85.6 PFF coverage grade, and brought in three interceptions.

Making the case more compelling for Amos is that last season, the Packers deployed cover 3 zone coverage 33.4% of the time, more than any other coverage they used. Ole Miss is also a zone-forward defensive scheme, which has made Amos very familiar and comfortable playing in cover 3. In fact, it's where Amos is at his best.

The week-to-week consistency Amos brings, as well as against stronger opponents, offers more assurance on the type of player Green Bay would be getting. He plays physically, is able to hang with the bigger receivers, and has shown he can shuck run-blocking attempts to go stick his nose in to make a play.

However, Amos might need safety help at times because he doesn't flash much for elite closing speed when he gets beat. That said, safety help isn't an issue for the Packers, and he's still been plenty sticky in man coverage. 

In fact, per PFF, he's allowed below a 19% completion percentage on throws of at least 20 yards downfield for his career.

Which, yes, it has been a long career. Amos is a fifth-year senior, but that also means he should be closer to reaching his talent ceiling, which plays well into the Packers' interest in more "urgency" to win now. Fresh off a first-team All-SEC season, his best ball could be right around the corner for his future team.

Amos will need to ensure he isn't giving up leverage early in a route, which has been where he's tended to slip up when his physical play style gets him in trouble.

But being the ballhawk corner he is, and should the combine not be a total flop, Amos is absolutely a player worth considering in the first round of the draft. Don't be surprised if he's the Packers pick at 23, as he's likely long gone before they're on the clock again.

Maxwell Hairston - Kentucky

Similar to Amos, Maxwell Hairston brings All-SEC hardware of his own to the table. Having collected two All-SEC honors in his last two seasons, Hairston's efforts across his body of work and at the Senior Bowl have drawn a large crowd. 

Right off the bat, the three house calls in the last two seasons jump off the stat sheet, sitting comfortably next to the six interceptions over the same timeframe.

Similar to Amos, Hairston's roughly 400 snaps in zone coverage will comfortably translate into the cover 3 heavy scheme Jeff Hafley runs. If any team is going to get the most out of Hairston right off the bat, despite only 20 college starts, the Packers schematically are ideally positioned.

What makes Hairston unique in this class, and where he's most aligned with what the Packers hold near and dear in the draft, is versatility. Hairston is most impressive in zone coverage but has shown real comfort running with receivers in man and as an effective blitzer. Making him arguably one of the most scheme-versatile cornerbacks in the class.

Despite his smaller size—5'11", 179 pounds at the Senior Bowl—which may hurt the Packers' ranking of him on their board, Hairston plays much bigger and is quite impressive in making open-field tackles. He's also been effective at punching above his weight class, having forced two fumbles last season and three in his past two campaigns. 

Hairston also has the advantage of being a converted wide receiver, which allows him to play cornerback with a higher IQ. He anticipates routes extremely well, has hardly been penalized, and has shown off an ability to undercut throws as well as anyone in the class.

An overall compliment to his game is that teams were flat-out not throwing Hairston's way as much in 2024. His knack for always being around the football and understanding how to leverage the sidelines well as a boundary cornerback is dangerous to toy around with.

The concern around Hairston is the shoulder injury that cost him much of his 2024 season and seemed to have a very Jaire-esc effect on his tackling. That shouldn't instantly disqualify Hairston by any means, as no two people are the same, but adding a little muscle to his frame would go a long way, especially with his liking for a physical style of play.

Hairston would be tremendous value for the Packers in round two, but it wouldn't be a total shock to see him sneak into day one, albeit less likely.

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Based in Seattle, Austin's roots are in Wisconsin and he bleeds Green & Gold. He also currently writes for Lombardi Ave and has been featured on various Packers podcasts. Follow him on Twitter at @AustinKrueger_.

__________________________

NFL Categories: 
0 points
 

Comments (46)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
stockholder's picture

February 12, 2025 at 10:30 am

Try again- Sign a Free Agent.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

February 12, 2025 at 10:33 am

Could be!
Question is which one and at what price?

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 12, 2025 at 12:00 pm

You know that both is possible - draft + sign a free agent CB.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 12, 2025 at 12:51 pm

One is 23 and will need help over the top
The other is too light, with a past shoulder injury.
Both are considered 2nd and 3rd rd choices
But if you like Gute's bust rate with cbs.
They are a perfect match.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 12, 2025 at 01:37 pm

Except these are the author's notables - not Gutekunst's.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 12, 2025 at 08:06 pm

Last year was CB time, but now the reload is imperative. I'll stick with my dude Cobee Bryant as the cover corner to handle the Williams , Addison types and add two more to the mix with Darien Porter , Iowa State and Jacob Parrish, K-State. Bill Walsh won a Super Bowl with three Rookies starting in the secondary. He probably keeps Jaire, if he agrees to a Refi. If Nixon keeps proclaiming his version of Glory, trade him. Gutey's clock should be running out of excuses.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 12, 2025 at 09:50 pm

@23- Take your pick.
1. Jihad Campbell LB Ala.
2. Walter Nolan. DL Ole miss
3. Shemar Stewart DE Tex A/M
4. Ben Morrison CB. ND
5. Emega Egbuka. WR OSU

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 14, 2025 at 07:39 am

Move Up for Nic Scourton. If Campbell comes onboard, where does Quay fit in? Cooper is now the Man controlling the second level. Shemar Turner is the same as Stewart and a later round selection.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

February 12, 2025 at 10:49 am

That's a nice pre combine breakdown.

Wonder if Austin's going to do some of these for all the possible positions for the first two days?

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 12, 2025 at 11:56 am

Maxwell Hairston (shoulder), Benjamin Morrison (hip) and Shavon Revel Jr. (acl) are all on my "Damaged" list - so caveat emptor. In addition, Hairston is slender-framed and long-speed deficient - which makes him a Day 3 prospect for me.

I do like Trey Amos - but in the first round would be too early for me. He appears to have a higher floor than ceiling - which places him as a Day 2 prospect.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

February 12, 2025 at 01:01 pm

So far the WRs and CBs who may be available in the first round look more interesting to me than the edge rushers. Maybe that will change by the time the draft rolls around. They got Clay Matthews at #26 overall, and he made a big impact as a rookie.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

February 12, 2025 at 01:04 pm

He could probably make an impact out of retirement. As long as he didn't drop into coverage, he was a force till the end.

0 points
0
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

February 12, 2025 at 01:32 pm

Almost a sure bet that Gutekunst will not draft a WR in the 1st round. Also the strength of the CB class is its depth - not the quantity of blue chip prospects. That is why WR and CBs are Day 2 and 3 targets for me. Conversely, this is an outstanding class for Edge and D-Linemen. So bpa should be the order of the day - at least in the 1st round.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:48 am

Agree. Solid DL prospects will be there on Day One. So will OL, interestingly some very good IOL prospects may fall to Team Gutey at 23. BPA for trench warfare!

Booker (AL) and Membou (MO) are IOL prospects and Banks (TX) is listed as OT but many see him better IOL to start with potential to eventually play T. But all have that versatility to play all 3 spots at IOL.

All three may be gone by 23, but one...even two may slip depending how the Board falls.

Both CBs discussed above are day 2 prospects, and even then, come with concerns. Hairston's size doesn't concern me as much as last year's season ending shoulder injury. Been there, done that! David Jeremiah (NFL) has him ranked at #44...and doesn't even list Amos in his Top 50. CBS has Amos at #38.

The top CB, Will Johnson (MI), will likely be long gone by 23. Now, if he falls...

0 points
0
0
BirdDogUni's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:10 am

Mike Green had 17 sacks last season as a Sophomore. He had a great Senior Bowl Week. He's a typical Gutey type pick. JS

0 points
0
0
William Brauer's picture

February 12, 2025 at 02:08 pm

Man I hope we don't go small as with your two guys here. I recall the Terrel Buckley experiment. These guys would likely struggle with the taller receivers so common today and would get beaten out on jump balls. And these guys coming up to tackle?

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 12, 2025 at 08:13 pm

I recall the Packers not knowing how to position and play T-Buck. He accrued 50 INTs over his career. Did very well in Miami and for Big Bad Bill and earned a SB ring.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 12, 2025 at 02:33 pm

I don't think either of those guys will help us score more than 10 points in the playoffs.

We scored 10 points, and every article is on how we improve the defense.

FWIW, Jahdae Barron is a CB who could be on the board at #23,

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

In the article on draft philosophy, Gutekunst said that ''it's easier to find small guys than big guys."" He said that in context of the pass defense. This kind of surprised me, since pass defense starts with keeping people covered, but as I started thinking about that, Gutekunst has taken Alexander, Savage, Stokes in the first round and all of them missed time with injuries. I'm wondering if he's thinking that he might be better off getting a guy at a position that isn't involved in so many high-speed collisions with his highest pick. Save that for later in the draft, and instead get a "big" guy, at a premium position. Probably a guy who was better as a junior.

If you've got a superduper shut down corner, great, but maybe the next best thing is a guy who is healthy enough to play and who doesn't cost a mint. Gutekunst could find guys like that later in the draft. We only need two starters at that position, and we have Alexander, Nixon, and Valentine returning, unless somebody gets traded.

Gutekunst is the opposite of Thompson,who just almost never said anything. Sometimes, it seems like he's leaving bread crumbs. If you take him at face value, and he holds true to what he believes, we're looking for a 'big' guy on the defensive front. CBs will be guys taken later.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

February 12, 2025 at 03:50 pm

I don't get it either. I read the article in packerswire that Jersey Al mentioned today, which is a good overall assessment of the Packers' needs, and the only defensive players the author had anything good to say about were Edgerrin Cooper and the safeties. Other than those guys, everyone is supposedly average at best, and mostly sucky. And yet this defense finished 6th in points allowed, 5th in yards allowed, and 4th in turnovers. How could they have done that well if most of the players are bad?

My own feeling is that we have a solid core of good players and a couple of excellent ones (McKinney and Cooper). We need to add one more excellent player and maybe one or two more good ones. I think this defense is not that far from being elite.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 12, 2025 at 04:23 pm

I knew I liked you.

"You can't make chicken salad out chicken feathers". Except in Green Bay apparently. And even more amazingly, the people who are making the chicken salad need to be fired because they are no good.

Also, it's not just because all the good things happened against bad teams. That's a weak argument, at best. Reality is, this is a good organization, it has good people running the show. Ball, LaFleur, Gutekunst have all done good jobs. The team is prospering. We went in to Philly and lined up without Watson, Reed, Doubs, or Jenkins and still played them pretty tough. We held them to 22, which nobody else in the playoffs did.

I think we're really close, but you just can't advance in the playoffs without scoring, and our last 4 seasons have ended with us having a bad day on offense. IMO, scoring more points....and all that entails....has to be the focus.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 13, 2025 at 08:59 am

"Also, it's not just because all the good things happened against bad teams. That's a weak argument, at best."

You don't win 11 games by accident. We can piss and moan about not beating DET, MN, or PHI--but very few teams did. They only lost one game to a team they were clearly better than...that kind of consistency can't be overlooked. They need to find ways to finish in 2025--that's the growth curve.

"I think we're really close, but you just can't advance in the playoffs without scoring,"

The whiteboard doesn't completely erase over an off-season, but these teams will all look different in 2025...then they have to prove it all over again. I don't think people expected the Packers would struggle to score at times after finishing fast in '23. I don't think people expected Philly to struggle down the stretch in 2023 after making an SB run in '22...but they figured it out.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:15 am

The hill I'm going to die on is these people lean into player ratings that aren't based on actual team play because they don't understand what they're seeing. Analytics are for people who don't understand football.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:35 am

Analytics works great in a 1 on 1 game masquerading as a team sport (baseball), which emboldens folks to try it in just about every sport. When you've got 22 guys on the field with varying calls and matchups, trying to devise metrics that actually make sense is hard.

0 points
0
0
gsd3's picture

February 12, 2025 at 04:39 pm

I like both. Nohl Williams should be a consideration as well.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 12, 2025 at 08:16 pm

Moving up boards. He's solid.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 12, 2025 at 05:06 pm

Michael Grant, DT. A big, big, guy. Played at Michigan, against a good level of competition.

Walter Nolen, DT. Not as big, but still big

Shemar Stewart, DE/EDGE Big enough, at 290.

Nick Scourton, DE/EDGE Almost tiny at 280.

These are guys that might be available at #23.

XXXXXXXX

As far as helping us get more points on the board, we're going to have to replace Watson and improve the offensive line depth.

Since it would be a pretty big deviation, I'm going to say we won't take a WR in the first round, but several WRs who meet criteria are going to be available on Day 2. On the offensive line, we'll probably draft the most versatile OT remaining who played against good competition.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 13, 2025 at 06:07 am

Walter Nolen, DT. Not as big, but still big-
The more I watch him. The more I like Him.
Reggie White was 6-5. Chris Jones 6 -6
Donald 6-1 = If Nolan runs 4.68.
@23 he'd be a steal.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 14, 2025 at 08:07 pm

They have Wyatt and Karl Brooks. Use them. You wanted Slaton extended. I agree at fair value. Clark may have to be moved via trade... Firepower is required at the WR position, especially with Watson out for a year. Restrepo & Arroyo from Miami. I take both in Rds One and Two. You don't get guys like Jalen Carter and Jordon Davis, unless you lose a lot of games. Roseman doesn't take guys like Van Ness.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:16 am

I hate that the draft is so much after free agency (here's my second bitch on this subject this post season). No other sport runs their player acquisitions this way. The draft is where you get cheap talent. It should be setting the table for how you sign guys to fill holes....instead, you're signing guys and then drafting projections to fill holes. It's stupid, but this is how the NFLPA wants it.

That said, the Packers will look a lot different in about five weeks than they do now, and while the general needs might not change much, the intensity of some needs will. I think CB is one of those positions--rookie CBs often play right away, but it's likely based on BG's history that he won't push all his chips at CB into the draft. Keep in mind that they invested heavily at S last year, and that their preferred slot was Bullard when their depth was tested...it takes a little pressure off the CB room, but they still need help. I have a hunch they're keeping Jaire, too--unless they give him a Jun 1 designation, they're going to pay him anyway. The available guys will change pretty dramatically in the next couple weeks with tags, re-signs, and cuts, but I'm expecting. at least a mid-level signing--I'm looking at Paulson Adebo, here, but I think there's a good chance he won't make it to market.

If I'm the Packers, I'm looking long and hard at different ways to play their top two TEs to take some pressure off their needs at WR and go from pressuring defenses on the boundary to pressuring them down the middle. The FA WR class is underwhelming (there will be cuts here, too) and isn't strong in guys who diversify the Packers' WR room. The draft seems stronger in slot types than X-types, which is where I think they really need help. That probably means they'd need another TE in the mid-rounds--that's not a popular opinion.

0 points
0
0
kyle.b.houser's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:42 am

This is a solid breakdown. When I looked at FA I also thought Paulson Adebo made a lot of sense. The other guy I was looking at was Kristian Fulton.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 13, 2025 at 12:27 pm

''If I'm the Packers, I'm looking long and hard at different ways to play their top two TEs'''

I've been thinking along those lines. We attempted 479 passes last year and only about 82 went to the TE. That's actually down from where we'd normally be, which is a little over 100. 70 of those 82 were to Kraft,
Musgrave got 10, Sims and Fitzpatrick got one each.

We're going to have to replace Watson in the rotation, and we're going to have to have a plan in case somebody else gets injured. That doesn't mean we couldn't go to the TE more. In fact, this draft is kind of rich in TEs and if we want to have two good, healthy TEs on the field, we might want to get somebody to replace Sims/Fitzpatrick in the 3 man rotation.

Spending premium draft picks on OL, WRs, and TEs isn't popular, but scoring 10 points in the biggest game of the season isn't either. If you want your QB to play better, give him protection and weapons.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 13, 2025 at 12:36 pm

I'm glad that you've come around on the tight end being a receiver. I'm not seeing Gutekunst deviating from his commitment to keeping the wideout room on first contracts. It was a very effective strategy in getting the cap contained.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 13, 2025 at 04:56 pm

We're only targeting the TE 5 times a game, so on the other 59, they're not receivers, they're blockers, and they did a damn good job of that last year in the ground game. I think that's the priority.....the TE has to get his man blocked....he's essentially a 6th OL.

I don't think 5 targets/game is enough, personally, and I wouldn't mind seeing that bumped up to 8 or so, especially if Musgrave is healthy. If we throw 28 passes/game, and 8 go to the TE, that still leaves 20 targets for the WRs (minus a couple for the RBs).

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 13, 2025 at 06:23 pm

hogwash. are they not on routes? that same argument applies to wideouts. so, 8 of the 28 passes go to receivers (tight ends), let's say 6 go to running backs, and then the remaining 14 go to 3 of the wideouts 14/3 =4.5 ish. so the wideouts aren't actually receivers either, right? They too block on running plays, no?

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

February 14, 2025 at 06:23 pm

I don't care about two TE formations as much as getting Kraft more targets. He was incredibly underused given his production. 1st among TEs in yards per catch, top 10 in all other metrics but catches where he was 19th. That's borderline criminal.

0 points
0
0
kyle.b.houser's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:40 am

I agree with both of these, but is there any reason why you limited the list to two instead of including guys like Jahdae Barron, Benjamin Morrison, and Shavon Revel?

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 13, 2025 at 10:21 am

He did it so it would take WR out of Rd 2.
His board is Trench/ CB.

But if we go CB in rd. 2

Just keep Alexander.
"Press CBs" are the only way to go.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 13, 2025 at 12:49 pm

stockholder, rather than Alexander, I'd rather have a CB who is actually in uniform and isn't costing a mint. Turn the page.

Without Alexander, our starters are Valentine and Nixon. We have King, who we drafted last year and put on the practice squad. We only carry 4 or 5 active. We should draft a CB, and try to sign one in FA. Alexander has to be worth at least a 3rd round pick and we'd create around $9M in cap space.....which we could use to sign a veteran backup Olineman.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 13, 2025 at 01:12 pm

all depends on what the medical staff sees. if he is back to full health, top five corners don't grow on trees.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 13, 2025 at 05:27 pm

Four seasons he's played 4, 16, 7, and 7 games. I can't believe that he'll stay healthy the entire year.

And he's 4 years older. One good year out of the last four.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

February 13, 2025 at 06:43 pm

again, belief and diagnosis are different animals. The Packers have doctors. We'll find out what they think.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

February 13, 2025 at 02:35 pm

Would YOU trade a third round pick for Alexander? I wouldn't. He's injured most of the time and has a huge contract. If the Packers don't want him, they will cut him. Then whichever team wants him most can pick him off the scrap heap with a cheap one-year prove-it deal.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

February 13, 2025 at 05:31 pm

Would you trade a third round pick for Rasul Douglas? Especially if you were already a good team with a shot at the Super Bowl but you needed a CB?

If we trade him, the acquiring team has to cover his salary, and they can rework that. It'd be $16M and $18M for the last two years of his deal. This is not something that would be a big obstacle for a team that wanted him.

I don't want him. He's made me believe that he can't stay healthy.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

February 13, 2025 at 03:57 pm

You make good points.
But if we're as close as Gute says.
You must not think like TT.
But instead think like Wolf.
Experience! Not next man up.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

February 13, 2025 at 09:08 pm

O.K. Four free agents for the defensive front, including two ALL-PROs, adding a veteran,ALL-PRO safety, another veteran safety in Mike Prior, dynamic kick and punt returners in Don Beebe and Desmond Howard, drafting a 2nd team ALL-PRO corner, Doug Evans in Rd Six, and Newsome starting as a One Pick. Year Eight for Gutey. No SB in the foreseeable future...

0 points
0
0
Racingdad's picture

February 13, 2025 at 07:11 pm

I read somewhere that Amos has no speed unless he’s hurt but at senior bowl he was slowest of cb’s 17 mph on gps anyone else hear that ? If so he may be too slow

0 points
0
0