The Domino Effect of Micah Parsons' Contract
By Carter Semb
Last Thursday afternoon, the Packers made one of the biggest moves in the team’s history by trading for Micah Parsons. The Packers traded away their 2026 and 2027 first-round picks and Kenny Clark to acquire the three-time All-Pro pass rusher. The Packers never make moves of this magnitude, and opportunities to acquire a player like Parsons only come around once in a lifetime. But as great as this move is, it will come at a cost.
Before diving in, let’s get one thing straight - this was a tremendous move by the Packers. Parsons is only 26 years old, has already been named to multiple All-Pro and Pro Bowl teams, and is just entering his prime. In addition to trading for Parsons, the Packers signed him to a four-year, $186 million contract in new money. With the existing year of his contract included, it’s essentially a five-year, $210 million contract. It was a large cost to acquire Parsons, but one that should be well worth it.
Parsons is one of the most disruptive pass rushers in the game. Not only that, he’s also versatile. He’s not just a hand-in-the-dirt pass rusher. He can generate pressure from anywhere on the field. Parsons has earned a PFF pass-rush grade of 91.6 or higher in each of his four seasons. He’s recorded double-digit sacks every year, and his pass-rush win rate is consistently among the best in the league. He is the epitome of a game-changer.
dude come on pic.twitter.com/wqEUDXcp9z
— Benjamin Solak (@BenjaminSolak) August 30, 2025
That said, paying any player of Parsons’ caliber is expensive. This isn’t the MLB, where owners can pay players anything they want. In the NFL, teams simply can't do that. The NFL still has a salary cap, and the Packers won't be able to pay every single player they want. This reality leads creates some questions without clear answers:
- Can the Packers re-sign any of their expiring contracts?
- Will they be able to be as active in free agency?
- Can the Packers extend any of their current players?
- Will the Packers have to release any of their core members?
Micah Parsons becoming a Packer is some of the most exciting Packers’ news in years, but there will be a domino effect that follows.
Leading Up to the Deal
Several key decisions ultimately enabled the Packers to make the move for Parsons. Back on May 1st, the Packers declined Quay Walker’s fifth-year option, which makes him a free agent after the 2025 season. That said, general manager Brian Gutekunst has remained adamant that they want to work something out with Walker long term. During his annual Packer Transplants interview with Cheesehead TV’s own Corey Behnke and Aaron Nagler, Gutekunst shared, "The only reason we didn't do the fifth-year option is a lot of the outside linebackers are calculated into that number, so it didn't make a lot of sense. We're going down that (extension) road with him as well to see if we can make that happen as well."
The Packers also were navigating a contract issue with Elgton Jenkins throughout the offseason. Rob Demovsky of ESPN.com shared, “Jenkins confirmed he hoped for a reworked contract, which sources said was aimed at guaranteeing some of the remaining money on the final two years of his deal.” Jenkins’ current deal has non-guaranteed base salaries of $11.7 million in 2025 and $18.5 million in 2026. With two years remaining on his current contract, Jenkins was seeking more guaranteed money, but the Packers provided no assurances that they would rework his contract.
Had the Packers acted on either of these moves, there’s a chance they wouldn’t have been able to make the move for Parsons. The Packers had already spent substantial cash this offseason on what they had to give players like Aaron Banks, Nate Hobbs, Matthew Golden, and Zach Tom. Unlike the other NFL teams, the Packers don’t have a billionaire owner with bottomless pockets. The Packers are fortunate to be in very healthy financial standing, but the cash has to come from somewhere, and the funds aren't unlimited. Could the Packers have extended Walker and Jenkins and then still traded Parsons? Maybe, but it would've been tricky. Sometimes the best moves are the moves that aren’t made.
A Closer Look at the Contract
No matter how the contract is broken down, the bottom line is the Packers are spending a lot of money on Micah Parsons. With one year remaining on his rookie contract, Parsons signed a four-year, $186 million contract extension with a $44 million signing bonus, $120 million due at signing, and a total of $136 million guaranteed. The contract will take him through his age-30 season in Green Bay.
The extension itself comes with an average annual value (AAV) of $46.5 million. Over the next five seasons, Parsons will have an AAV of $42 million per season. Either way, it’s top-of-the-market money for one of the league’s most elite pass rushers.
| Year | Age | Base | Signing Bonus | Option | Cap Hit | Dead Cap |
| 2025 | 26 | $1,170,000 | $8,800,000 | - | $9,970,000 | $120,000,000 |
| 2026 | 27 | $2,387,000 | $8,800,000 | $7,600,000 | $19,237,000 | $110,030,000 |
| 2027 | 28 | $3,107,000 | $8,800,000 | $14,488,600 | $26,845,600 | $60,843,000 |
| 2028 | 29 | $40,550,000 | $8,800,000 | $14,488,600 | $64,288,600 | $17,600,000 |
| 2029 | 30 | $43,550,000 | $8,800,000 | $14,488,600 | $68,288,600 | $8,800,000 |
While the deal on paper is for five seasons, the Packers will have to rework the contract eventually. It operates more like a three-year deal. Based on the contract structure, the Packers will have to reevaluate the contract after the 2027 season. Parsons’ base salary for the first three years of the deal is very team-friendly, and the dead cap numbers are exponential. Then, once 2028 comes around, the base salary and cap hit numbers skyrocket, while the dead cap numbers become much more favorable for the Packers. The Packers will have to rework the contract at that point.
In a world where Parsons and the Packers don’t work out, the first real opportunity for the Packers to move on would be before the 2028 season. If the Packers wanted to move on, they could release or trade Parsons and save up to $55.4886 million with only $17.6 million in dead cap. The hope is that Parsons is a Packer for the foreseeable future, but the same was said about players like Za’Darius Smith, De’Vondre Campbell, and Jaire Alexander. The Packers ended up moving on early from all three.
For a more detailed breakdown, check out James Reynolds’ piece from Saturday that dives into the specifics of the deal.
Upcoming Decisions
Whenever you give a player a top-of-the-market contract, concessions will have to be made somewhere. According to Spotrac, the Packers are projected to have about $36,166,448 in cap space for 2026. That sounds like quite a bit, but that will disappear quickly. While there are estimations that the salary cap could rise to $290-$300 million in 2026, the Packers still aren’t going to be able to pay everyone. The question now becomes: who will stay and who will go?
Looking ahead, the Packers have three players with alarming salary cap numbers in 2026: Elgton Jenkins ($24.8 million), Aaron Banks ($24.85 million), and Rashan Gary ($28 million). The Packers aren’t going to let these numbers stay as they are right now. Jenkins’ contract is the likeliest to be addressed, and the most likely option might be releasing him. An extension is also an option, although that seems unlikely. If Jenkins becomes an All-Pro caliber center, the Packers may have to reconsider, but 2025 looks like it will be his last season as a Packer. Not to mention, it seems unlikely the Packers would move on from Banks after just signing him this past March. Either way, it’s hard to fathom the Packers paying almost $50 million combined for a guard and a center.
While Rashan Gary might be one of the biggest beneficiaries on the field of Micah Parsons joining the team, he may also be expendable after 2025. Regardless of how strong a 2025 season Gary has, it’s unlikely the Packers will let him play the 2026 season with a cap number of over $28 million. The Packers could try and keep him around for 2026 and beyond by extending him and lowering his cap number, or they could also opt to trade or release him (although an outright release is more likely). The Packers would carry over $17 million in dead cap if they released Gary, but they would save over $10 million in cap space. With Parsons on one edge of the defense, the Packers could simply opt to go young and cheap at the other edge. Lukas Van Ness, Barryn Sorrell, Brenton Cox, and Collin Oliver are all younger and would cost far less money.
As the Packers sort through potential cap casualties and which contracts need reworking, they will also have to navigate how they want to approach the expiring contracts. As young as the Packers have been over the last three seasons, those rookie contracts are nearing their end, including the contracts of quite a few key players.
| 2026 Unrestricted Free Agents | 2026 Restricted Free Agents |
|
|
One thing is known: the Packers will not bring back all 17 players listed above. Even if they could pull it off financially, they wouldn’t. There are some notable names on the lists, though. Romeo Doubs, Christian Watson, Rasheed Walker, Sean Rhyan, and Quay Walker have been vital to the Packers' success over the last several seasons. But the Packers have positioned themselves well to endure the losses of any of them. Each one has an interesting case to bring back, but they all could be on their way out the door.
Doubs has played in 43 games for the Packers over the last three years. He has been a constant for Jordan Love. Watson brings an element to the offense that no one else can replicate, but he’s frequently injured. The Packers invested draft capital by taking Matthew Golden and Savion Williams. They will also have Jayden Reed and Dontayvion Wicks still on the roster. With four competent receivers on the roster, the Packers can’t afford to spend substantial money to bring either player back for 2026.
Rasheed Walker and Rhyan have been reliable components on the Packers' offensive line. The Packers invested draft assets into Jordan Morgan and Anthony Belton. The offensive tackle market is booming, and if Rasheed Walker hits the open market, he’s going to get paid. Rhyan may earn a big payday, similar to when Jon Runyan Jr. left for the New York Giants. If the Packers were to move on from Jenkins, they might use those savings and consider bringing Rhyan back. It seems increasingly likely that the 2026 offensive line may look drastically different.
Quay Walker is the most interesting case. Gutekunst has mentioned several times his desire to extend Quay Walker, and it’s doubtful the addition of Parsons altered that. That may not even be an option anymore, though. Based on the current linebacker market, Walker could command a contract worth anywhere from $10 to $20 million per year. Walker wouldn’t earn a top-of-the-market deal, but at only 25 years old, he wouldn’t be cheap. Ty’Ron Hopper has also shown throughout the preseason that he could play a more prominent role. It wouldn’t be surprising to see the Packers let Walker walk in free agency next offseason.
The Packers will still be able to retain some players on both lists. Guys like Emanuel Wilson, Chris Brooks, and Zayne Anderson wouldn't require big financial commitments, but all of that money adds up. The lists of unrestricted free agents and restricted free agents are long. Each player the Packers decide to retain will come at a cost, whether it be large or small. And that doesn't even include the list of players who will be heading into the final year of their contracts.
| 2027 Unrestricted Free Agents |
|
The Packers clearly think highly of all of these players, but the Packers will have to let several of them walk. Per NFL rules, the Packers can extend any player with three or more years of accrued service, but there’s no way they can extend all of them. Tucker Kraft and Jayden Reed are among the players who will be eligible. The Packers only completely one rookie extension this offseason (Zach Tom), so it will be interesting to see if they will explore any rookie extensions next offseason. Tucker Kraft is the most likely candidate to earn a rookie extension, but now with Parsons' contract on the books, that may have to wait.
How Will the Dominoes Fall?
Being able to make these decisions is a champagne problem. The opportunity to trade for and pay a player like Micah Parsons is an opportunity that doesn't come along every day. Navigating the aftermath of the contract is a trade-off that every GM (other than Jerry Jones) would take. It’s a privilege. But the Packers will be forced to make concessions elsewhere. The only two Packers who aren't going anywhere are Parsons and Jordan Love, but those are the types of players most franchises want to build around.
Micah Parsons has been a star since entering the NFL:
⭐ 94.3 pass rush grade (2nd)
⭐ 21.3% win rate (2nd)
⭐ 19.7% pressure rate (1st)The No. 7 player and No. 2 EDGE on the PFF50 pic.twitter.com/U4THdk3AVu
— PFF (@PFF) July 18, 2025
Predicting how the Packers will move forward is impossible. No one knows how they plan to address free agency next summer or if they will hand out a few extensions. The reality is that there are existing 25+ contracts that need addressing, and hard decisions will have to be made. The Packers will have to say goodbye to some really good players and leaders in the locker room. They may also have to get even more creative with their salary cap. Will they have to kick some money down the road to retain certain players? It's possible. Luckily, the Packers remain in good hands. Gutekunst can find talent year after year and navigate some difficult salary cap situations. These are all difficult decisions, and Gutekunst is probably ecstatic to make them.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Carter Semb is a lifelong Packer fan, shareholder, and season ticket holder. He is a contributor for Cheesehead TV and Packers Talk. For commentary surrounding Wisconsin sports, he can be found on X at @cmsemb.
__________________________





Comments (44)
Bitternotsour
September 01, 2025 at 03:02 pm
The domino effect extends to the playing field. Excellence at one position can raise the standard throughout the lineup. Resources/attention expended to Parsons will no doubt have a ripple effect on Gary and Quay, and an improved pass rush will undoubtedly make our corners much better. I'd also argue a player like Parsons will make Matt LaFleur look better too. Who knows, maybe an extra possession or two will improve the offense too.
Bitternotsour
September 01, 2025 at 03:55 pm
I'd also mention the domino effect of Viking fans losing their fucking minds. It's so demoralizing for them - I can't imagine that Brian Gutekunst won't win the executive of the year for that alone.
Since'75
September 01, 2025 at 04:09 pm
I think to win executive of the year, it helps to win something.
Like a SB, CCG, Division title (at the least).
Lets hope it's one of these years.
I see a true 2, maybe 3 year SB window.
.02
SicSemperTyrannis
September 01, 2025 at 04:59 pm
A dynasty is pretty much out the window now but at least 3 conference championship games in a row is a much higher probability. That's a trade I'll take 🍻
jannesbjornson
September 01, 2025 at 07:21 pm
Cooper will be the guy bringing havoc when Parsons is doubled up.
Cheezehead72
September 02, 2025 at 07:02 am
My prediction is that a player like Parsons will get Gute fired and possibly MLF. He has a sprained back. He is a cancer. He will want more money. He will never be happy. Mark my words. This takes the Packers from 8 wins this season to 10.
Bearmeat
September 02, 2025 at 07:40 am
Oh. So it turns out that what you‘re saying above IS actually all just copium and BS? Hmmm… https://x.com/BrianSuttererMD/status/1962598620248559670?
splitpea1
September 01, 2025 at 03:32 pm
Damn, look how far that blue line in the graph is ahead of everyone else on first and second downs! As for third down, the Packers' defense was already 7th in the league in conversion rate--a big jump up from 28th the previous season, no doubt partially because of the hiring of Hafley.
Parsons also has the most quick pressures in the league since he arrived in 2021. I think that means he has shed a block and is breathing down the QB's neck in 2.5 seconds or less, which disrupts the play and doesn't give it time to develop.
I'd rather worry about how the dominoes are going to fall later, but if Hopper, Golden, and Belton (hopefully) show they are capable, then next season's UFA list won't be such a concern.
dobber
September 01, 2025 at 05:47 pm
Notice that Rashan Gary is 14th on that list.
LambeauPlain
September 01, 2025 at 08:05 pm
You and Splitpea1 saw what I saw. I knew Gary was a top NFL Rusher but did not know he was 14th in pressure on early downs since 2021! With #1 and #14 coming at you, on 1st and 2nd downs, OC's will have to plan very carefully.
#1 and #14 rushing has to be one of, if not the best in the NFL on early downs
This was a very good article, Carter!
greengold
September 01, 2025 at 09:08 pm
Totally agree, and a lot of great comments here too.
Trading for Micah Parsons was an exceptional opportunity for the Packers to realize ultimate success. Now, the team needs to focus on closing the deal, giving their very best efforts - players and coaches alike.
Championships aren’t won on paper. Bring that Lombardi Trophy home, gentlemen.
GPG.
GregC
September 01, 2025 at 03:50 pm
Thanks for explaining this. Like splitpea1, I think they will be okay for next year because they have some young players who can compensate for those who leave. It will get trickier in 2027, though. They will need to draft well, without the luxury of first round picks for two years.
Coldworld
September 02, 2025 at 07:59 am
They will need to draft well, but they will also need to develop talent better. We need to start seeing PS and depth players becoming useful pieces more often and see starters ascend to compensate for the lack of earlier picks and cap latitude.
A few Rasul Douglas type contributors from bargain free agency wouldn’t hurt either. I’m going to keep an eye on Neyor. He’s legitimately got all the tools: if he can stay healthy and polish some technical issues, he has the raw talent to be a preferred starter in the NFL. Those are the cheap multi year gems we need to find a couple of, ideally.
The RFAs next year could all be affordably back if one doesn’t have a breakout. If a guy like Cox (for example), Emmanuel Wilson or FitzPatrick forces us to give them a bigger contract through play, then we are probably doing extremely well.
What we probably will see is good but unspectacular pieces leave—if they are cheap enough to sign then we can probably hope to do better. Enagbare might be an example, Rhyan another (unless he replaces Jenkins for cap reasons). The more RFAs and young back of the roster types like Jennings step into those shoes the better now, but also equivalents spotted on other rosters (perhaps Kinnard is one, or Dalton Cooper). All group coaches need to show some year-on-year growth by members of their position groups.
Since'75
September 01, 2025 at 04:03 pm
After pushing the salary cap down the road annually, the Packers found a healthy spot as far as their salary cap was concerned.
It's still ok, but that will be changing...for obvious reasons.
No matter how i look at this trade, i think this was a good get for the Packers.
Sometimes, it's just time....to go all in.
Getting to the SB isn't easy, nor is winning it.
Some teams have SuperBowl windows.
The Packers right now, are one of those teams.
This trade improved two aspects of the team, imo, the weakest aspects.
1) Pass rush
2) Secondary
And yes, the 2nd is related to the first.
It wasn't up to me, but if it was Jaire would still be on this team at a reduced rate over his old contract.
I know your rolling the dice on his health.
But the bottom line is the Packers are a better team with Jaire, than without.
Just my .02, after the fact observation.
Bitternotsour
September 01, 2025 at 04:08 pm
It has a secondary effect on the line as well as it takes attention away from Rashan Gary who despite locals not appreciating him, is a force.
Since'75
September 01, 2025 at 05:48 pm
When i said that trade improves the pass rush, i was including Gary, LVN, Cooper and Co..
I thought it was implied.
Gary might be a force, but it's all relevant i suppose.
Just to be clear, i'm talking about ROI.
According to MLF, he once said Gary was a game wrecker, once.
Or, once upon a time anyway.
IMO, as far as the Packers great pass rushers, he's without a doubt, in tier II.
SicSemperTyrannis
September 01, 2025 at 05:02 pm
Ja is playing for $6MM, at that rate having him and Nate Hobbs with the goal being a full season between the two of them would be ok
Since'75
September 01, 2025 at 05:41 pm
Yea it would.
LeotisHarris
September 01, 2025 at 05:53 pm
Our friend Ja isn't playing though. He signed for $6 million, and he did some things today "from a physical standpoint" that Coach Harbs called "encouraging", but he's pretty much been holed up in the fancy Ravens Under Armour Performance Center rehabbing that pesky knee.
Bitternotsour
September 01, 2025 at 08:04 pm
As fans of our former guys, I hope he's successful with that knee. Ja was a very good Packer. I still watch that 2018 play where he blows up Adam Thielen to steal Stefon Diggs soul to cheer myself on grey days in the pacific nw.
LambeauPlain
September 01, 2025 at 08:12 pm
Alexander the Occasional he remains.
MitchAnthony
September 01, 2025 at 10:32 pm
That $6 million is way below what it seems he would have been willing to accept from GB. I think a whole lot of GB fans would have really liked to have him stay for something that more appropriately comported with his playing time and health, but it was Alexander who wanted out of GB unless they paid him the full due of his existing contract. That wasn't going to happen. Let's not try to think now it could have.
Coldworld
September 02, 2025 at 08:17 am
I agree with you on Jaire if he was healthy. He clearly isn’t currently and that changes my perspective. This season his new team is going to try to nurse him through and hope that he can endure.
Given the news on him, I think his condition could go either way. It may mean he’s not the Jaire of old or not very often so. That could be transitory as his health gradually improves, or it could be that his career is never the same.
Stik75
September 01, 2025 at 04:47 pm
Excellent Article. Will be keeping it for future reference.
It was going to be hard to keep the band together for 2026 and 2027 before Parsons.
Now its really tough even though Parsons cap hit is friendly enough short term.
But gets almost impossible going forward with the early guarantee dates in his contract.
Leatherhead
September 01, 2025 at 04:48 pm
Most of the 2026 defense is already under contract.
SicSemperTyrannis
September 01, 2025 at 05:05 pm
So is Whelan, right? This is not the first article tacetly saying otherwise, so I'm confused.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 02, 2025 at 02:01 am
Whelan is under control for 2026 via an RFA tender that the team can choose to issue. There is no negotiation as to price and the player remains under team control whether he signs it or not.
Whelan was a UDFA in 2022 and did not make the Saints roster and was out of the league. He played in the XFL in 2022. GB paid him $750K in 2023 and he played 17 games. GB paid him $915K in 2024 and he played 17 games. He is expected to earn $1.03M this year (2025) in GB. If he plays 6 games, he will earn a third accrued season going into 2026. Right now, he has two. Players who have exactly 3 accrued seasons become restricted free agents. Their team can issue a tender for $3.453M (Right of first refusal/original round), $5.658M (2nd round) or $7.893M (1st round).
However, punters don't make all that much. The highest paid punter makes $4.05M per year. The Packers might issue a tender if they cannot reach a long term deal, but Whelan's market is pretty well set at between $3.5M and $4.5M per year (assuming some cap inflation). It is very likely that Whelan will be a Packer in 2026, short of injury, off field incident, or a severe meltdown on the field.
Coldworld
September 02, 2025 at 08:27 am
If one boils it down, RFAs almost never leave a team unless the team wants them to or is at best ambivalent on tender cost/benefit. We have non-tendered in the past where we think we can get the player cheaper, and typically have for depth and role players.
If a RFA blows out the tender value by truly excelling on field then teams either trade or, far more likely, offer a long term deal early because that player is too good to let hit FA next year and locks them up long term (spreading any cap hit).
For example, if Brenton Cox were to get 10+ sacks, what would we do? I’d argue we’d do our best to retain him. That might include hard choices elsewhere, or we’d be investigating trades for him or a peer at his position. The team holds all the cards, though the player can change which ones are played.
I would not be surprised if Whelan has a long term deal later this year (once we know our cap costs through the majority of this season) to maximize the spread of the cap hit, assuming he plays to expectations.
Stik75
September 02, 2025 at 03:49 am
Yes the D of 26 players only has fiive players who arent under
Contract.
But Gary is a candidate to not make it or restructure because of cap hit .
The players not under contract:
Walker
Enagabare
Cox
Anderson
Neimann (contract has not been disclosed)
Right now I project 14m in usable Cap Space:
This has to cover any resignings, extensions, any free agent aquisitions and Any IR/PUP salaries.
Plus thats with an optimistic $28m salary cap increase over 2025 and is about what our cap space is right now. Which will go lower.
IF the cap increase is lower it will hurt.
Other restructures could help.
But overall it will likely be tight to do anything substantive depending on how the cap is manipulated.
Bearmeat
September 02, 2025 at 04:34 am
Rn I expect of all those names only Kraft and Valentine get re signed. I would expect a Gary trade and Jenkins cut.
Coldworld
September 02, 2025 at 08:40 am
Cox is a RFA. I’d expect him back unless he is either a huge disappointment or a stellar break out (when things get more complex).
WD
September 01, 2025 at 07:08 pm
ESPN has reported that Parsons has some lingering back issues and may need an epidermal before playing. I like to assume the Packers did a full medical on him before making the deal. Why is the issue not being raised?
LambeauPlain
September 01, 2025 at 08:18 pm
Probably not being raised because it is not an issue?
I read some Dallas coach said a before the trade and during the contract dispute that Parson's back is fine ...implying it was a "contract twinge".
stockholder
September 01, 2025 at 07:15 pm
1. The domino effect ?
- The sky is not going to fall down.
My first response to any enemy is.
WE GOT PARSONS !!!
Jenkins was never going to get a pay day.
His injuries have made that just a fact.
And lets not forget what TT did.
When his offensive guys wanted $$.
He did n't need them and let them relocate.
The packers will give their starters
every chance to make money.
And if KC signed MVS for 10 mil.
Gute won't pay it unless their D.Adams.
So that leaves us with the DL and Walker.
IMO we carried 6 DL just so we could sign Walker.
And if Gary Fails to produce after getting Parsons.
He'll go the way of the Smiths.
There won't be any stand-offs.
jannesbjornson
September 01, 2025 at 07:44 pm
They will let Walker go into free agency. Hopper needs to be on the field. Parsons & Cooper are going to bring heat and control the inside if the stunt game gets into gear. Let Stackhouse get his licks in against Detroit. Set the tone for 2025. A lot of good LBs coming into the 2026 Draft.
stockholder
September 01, 2025 at 07:48 pm
Will see- I still say this OL will change next year.
And Quay Walker will be here.
LLCHESTY
September 01, 2025 at 07:17 pm
One thing I haven't seen mentioned that I think played a part in making this an easy decision was Gutey knowing he's got some comp picks coming in '27 and '28. Obviously not day 1 and usually not day 2 picks unless someone gets a major deal, but those extra swings at the plate will be helpful when making up for not having a 1st rounder for two years. Also doesn't help next year but they've done a good job planning for the loss of those FAs and can fill out the roster with some cheap vets.
HawkPacker
September 01, 2025 at 10:29 pm
Yes Double L, I thought of that as well. However, IIRC the highest draft pick they can receive is a third rounder.
LambeauPlain
September 01, 2025 at 08:33 pm
After this season, some difficult decisions in the unrestricted group...7 are key players The restricted group, depending on 2025 production will be easier choices.
So by 2026 and 2027, 24 of the current 53 have contracts that will be addressed or gone. Probably a higher churn than most teams given the injection of youth during the last few years. And they are still young!
Parsons has a huge contract, but the article showed how it can be managed to stay under the cap for several seasons. But the "cap money" bank account to keep key players has been significantly drawn down.
If you want to be bold in today's NFL, this is what "policies of parity" will do to your roster.
I do believe one of the reasons Gutey got opportunity to get Parsons was because Jerry was reluctant to pay Parson new $millions from his "Jones Money" bank account...his family's money.
Gutey just needed to make sure Ed Policy OK with the effect on the Packers strong balance sheet.
Stik75
September 01, 2025 at 10:22 pm
Correct me if Im wrong.
But Zayne Anderson will be a Restricted Free Agent as he will only have three accrued seasons after 2025.
And Bo Melton will be a Exclusive Rights Free Agent as he will only have two accrued seasons after 2025.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 02, 2025 at 02:15 am
Correct. So Bo Melton will be on the team if the Packers want him.
Zayne is more iffy. He isn't worth the 1st round tender ($7.89M) or the 2nd round tender of $5.658M, and might or might not be worth the right of first refusal tender of $3.453M. It depends on whether he gets a chance to play and how well he plays if he does get on the field. He does need to be on the roster or a full pay list (IR with no split contract) for 6 games. The other thing is that Zayne will be 29 in 2026.
Coldworld
September 02, 2025 at 08:48 am
Anderson has 2 accrued seasons currently I believe. If he remains on the roster for this one I think he’d be vested before the 2026 season.
Snap the ball
September 02, 2025 at 12:55 am
Jerry knows he had a bad back
I think we got took
Pressure by medical staff to sign him off I bet
His brother said he had a bad back.
Snap the ball
September 02, 2025 at 01:06 am
Just like the line in the movie Platoon. I got a bad feeling on this Boss