Skill Position-Free Draft: A Historical Rarity
The Packers select zero skill position players for only the second time in history.
By GregMeinholz

What provides the most excitement in an NFL game? Probably offense, right? A deep shot down the field from the quarterback to a receiver, a long run by a running back, a powerful scamper after the catch by a tight end, at least for the more casual fans, it's the offensive stars that put butts in seats. Those positions are commonly referred to as "skill positions," and you need good ones on your team if you're going to find any success.
Last week, many NFL franchises selected skill position players who sent shock waves of excitement through their fan base for the upcoming season. But Green Bay Packers fans were not among them. That's because the Packers didn't select a single skill position player in this year's draft. There were some small expectations around a possible tight end, backup quarterback, or even a running back being selected by Green Bay, but none of those expectations came to fruition. The Packers selected players at areas of need, and currently, they have a good list of options at each skill position. So, the need may not have been great enough, or players available may not have been enticing enough to pull the trigger.
But it hit me. We're so used to at least a wide receiver or a running back in the late rounds for competition. When was the last time the Packers didn't select a single one? So, I did some research. This is the first skill position-free draft since 2004. Okay, to those of us over the age of 30, that's not that long ago. Oh, and do yourself a favor and don't look back at that draft, it'll bring back long-suppressed nightmares. But before 2004, there wasn't a single Packers draft without a selection who would've qualified as a skill position player.
Just to clarify, quarterback, running back, wide receiver, and tight end are classified as skill positions. Our kicker taken in the sixth round would be classified as a "specialist."
This is actually a statistical anomaly across the NFL. As far as I could find, the Green Bay Packers are the only team in history to not select a single skill position player in the modern draft era. And they've done it twice. Not sure if we're going to add that to the list of accomplishments on the Lambeau Field facade, but it's a historical tidbit nonetheless.
Why make history now?
It's very doubtful that Brian Gutekunst was aiming to pull off this historical event this year. He addressed this year's draft as being "unique" in that they felt good about the core around Jordan Love, which allowed them to more directly address positions of need in the draft. Which, of course, not many would argue would be cornerback, offensive, and defensive line.
Gute expressed excitement for last year's receivers drafted early (Matthew Golden and Savion Williams) and for them to have more clearly defined roles in the absence of Romeo Doubs and Dontayvion Wicks. He also noted that he viewed the QB class as "light" this year, with the depth of talent at the position not being as exciting as in other years.
Despite the lack of attention during the draft, the Packers did set out to sign UDFA skill position players like QB Kyron Drones from VA Tech, RB Jaden Nixon from UCF, WR J. Michael Sturdivant from Florida, and TEs RJ Maryland of SMU and Eni Falayi of Wake Forest. So, the positions aren't being completely ignored.
In a league often obsessed with the next big offensive star, the Packers chose to improve their defense and strengthen a few holes. While it's true that they're the only team to give skill positions the draft day cold shoulder, they’re also one of the few with the roster depth to even try it. The Packers' 2026 draft likely didn't put new butts in the seats from an offensive perspective, but if this attention to the defense holds up, Packers fans won't mind it at all.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (34)
Cheezehead72
April 29, 2026 at 10:12 am
Ok I had to do it. I looked back at the 2004 draft being as it was not ringing a bell with me and yes it did bring back some bad memories.
We picked Ahmad Carroll at 25 a pick I did not like once I heard of the pick. I really had nothing to say until pick 87 when they picked B. J. Sander the punter. Oh how much I was upset to see them pick a punter in the 3rd and then he proved why you do not pick a punter in the third.
On the bright side we picked Corey Williams at 179 and Scott Wells at 251. Both of those were solid picks.
Packitin
April 29, 2026 at 10:37 am
And an even more important lesson: the Packers had a much larger trove of draft picks when the draft began, but used (wasted, I'd say) all that extra capital trading up for Thomas, Washington, and Sander.
Hopefully we won't look back 20+ years from now and bemoan the lost picks used to get McClellan and Smack.
Cheezehead72
April 29, 2026 at 10:46 am
I hope so to but I am good with using two 7ths to get the best kicker in the draft. There is a big difference in doing that and giving up good picks for a punter. Yes a good punter can change the game but a good kicker can win the game.
LambeauPlain
April 29, 2026 at 11:08 am
Exactly...Gutey stated they had targeted "SMACK!" and did not believe he would last to their first 7th.
He then stated they did not see any prospects left in the 7th that together would exceed their value for the consensus best kicker in the draft. It is likely they would have used the 7ths on UDFAs they eventually signed.
Coldworld
April 29, 2026 at 11:41 am
I’m not going to express an opinion on Smack as an individual prospect, other than he’s got a strong leg. Why? Because no one really knows with Kickers till after the event beyond basic leg strength. Against that, drafting a kicker is risky because the best frequently take some years and usually multiple teams to really come into their own. Teams are not going to give Kickers the amount of time Crosby got to become good these days, including us.
That said, if Gute believed that the greatest available return on investment was a kicker by that point, then he seems to have picked the best option per the consensus. That’s not a bad use of picks, just a potentially risky one. At that stage in the draft I’m fine with that. It’s a punt with no floor but a very high ceiling if it works out.
Coldworld
April 29, 2026 at 10:47 am
Wells was a great pick, but that draft eventually played a role in ending Sherman’s time with the Packers.
LambeauPlain
April 29, 2026 at 11:20 am
That draft preceded a 4-12 season after logging 9-7, 12-4, 12-4, 10-6, 10-6. It was also the season Sherman completely lost control of Favre and let him do his own thing. Brett played sandlot football slinging it into double and triple coverage earning 29 ints and an interception rate of nearly 5%!
Exit the old Mike and bring in the new Mike. McCarthy got ahold of Favre and demanded he follow his play calls and play with discipline and led the team to 8-8. The 13-3 season followed albeit with that horrible NFCCG vs 9- 7Giants.
Bitternotsour
April 29, 2026 at 11:32 am
People forget how innovative McCarthy was with that offense. No one could stop that Big 5 package when he introduced it. Besides that, he was a straight up mensch.
Coldworld
April 29, 2026 at 04:59 pm
Early MM could adapt too, in game and for opponents.
Leatherhead
April 29, 2026 at 05:35 pm
McCarthy is going to the HOF. And yes, lots of people were glad when he was fired.
The McCarthy/Rodgers rift in 2018.....I have wondered what might have happened if the Packers had kept McCarthy and traded Rodgers.
One thing about McCarthy's offense.....the QB is going to take hits. In Dallas, and in Green Bay, the starting QB missed time with injury. Rodgers missed a big chunk of 2013, a big chunk of 2017, and played hurt in 2018. I like the LaFleur approach of reducing the hits that Love has to take, because it only takes one to sideline your season.
GregC
April 29, 2026 at 12:03 pm
You're thinking of 2005. The Packers went 10-6 in 2004 and lost to the Vikings in the playoffs.
Vachio
April 29, 2026 at 01:34 pm
I'm with you. I hated that pick, especially because he was all over the Roy Williams highlight videos getting absolutely torched. You never want to see highlights of the guy your team drafted getting abused by a player one of the team's major rivals drafted.
TarynsEyes
April 29, 2026 at 10:53 am
With salaries that the non-skilled positions are getting these days, would it not behoove us to expand the criteria of a skilled position? Will Anderson is the latest example being paid what a couple of years ago was a number resigned for QBs. $50 million a year for an EDGE guy. This cannot simply be dismissed as a result of inflation of NFL profits/salary cap increases. These players think themselves, and command salary, as skilled-position players as much as those divas who, more often than not, are not.
WestCoastPackerBacker
April 29, 2026 at 02:18 pm
I think the term originated with sportswriters to designate players who regularly handle the football once it is snapped. Doesn’t mean other players are unskilled.
TarynsEyes
April 29, 2026 at 04:18 pm
Yes, I know the history of its designation, but it doesn't really apply to those select positions anymore. It's an embedded meaning that most will simply adhere to as a descriptive measure concerning the offense.
WestCoastPackerBacker
April 29, 2026 at 08:52 pm
Yes it means what it means.
Packers0808
April 29, 2026 at 06:16 pm
You posted that exact post sometime in tbe past,
stockholder
April 29, 2026 at 10:54 am
Gute never looked at Rodgers like that.
And with the ref in the background
with a packed crowd.
Is this the first Ai picture on Cheesehead TV?
Or Family Night?
Cheezehead72
April 29, 2026 at 11:11 am
Rodgers must have hit the tanning booth
GreenandBold
April 29, 2026 at 11:22 am
I’d argue that corner is a skill position in many ways with the skill set needed to play it . Although many corners are corners and not receivers due to their hands . I hope Cisse can change our cornerback room with his skill set and grab a starting job this season .
Vachio
April 29, 2026 at 01:37 pm
I've always felt the same way. Skill position always meant "typically non-giant people" to me. If the norm for the position is under ~240, that's a skill position to me.
WestCoastPackerBacker
April 29, 2026 at 02:19 pm
Skill position means players who touch the football regularly once the ball is snapped.
Cheezehead72
April 29, 2026 at 02:29 pm
Not always because some consider a CB and Safety as skill players. The reason muddies the waters even more. For simplicity I like your definition if we use it otherwise lets get rid of the term.
GregC
April 29, 2026 at 12:08 pm
Interesting bit of trivia about the lack of skill position players. This is the first I've heard of it. It was unnoticeable because they didn't need any. I was not on the WR or backup QB train. An RB or TE with a late pick would've been nice but was not necessary.
Vachio
April 29, 2026 at 01:40 pm
I felt, and still feel, that RB is a sneaky need. Jacobs can't keep going forever and Lloyd can't seem to stay on the field. That being said, the guys I had targeted all went way higher than I expected.
Cheezehead72
April 29, 2026 at 02:32 pm
Normally I would say you draft a WR every draft but when you only have 8 picks that turned to 6 I can see skipping the WR. I do have my eye on Sturdivant. He might be a good WR in 2 or 3 years.
Leatherhead
April 29, 2026 at 05:19 pm
You dress 21 offensive players for games, and that's usually going to be 2 QBs, 9 OL, and 10 Skill position players. Of the 10 we had last year, we're minus Wilson, Doubs, and Wicks.
Of those returning, Kraft was injured last year, Reed was injured last year, Watson has been injured several times in his career, so has Musgrave, and even Jacobs had to play through injuries last year.
It looks like we're headed to Watson-Reed-Golden-Kraft-Jacobs as our most popular skill grouping. Behind them, not a lot. Musgrave. Maybe Lloyd can survive training camp this year. Savion Williams can rotate in as the #4 WR. Maybe we'll pick up a RB right before the season on roster cutdowns.
Bitternotsour
April 29, 2026 at 05:42 pm
Perhaps there's more to Savion Williams than you see, I'm willing to believe there is. I'll take that 5 at the top. Quality, speed, some size. Musgrave is more than you are giving credit for as well. Back-up running backs are a dime a dozen, but I'd like to see Lloyd last thru training camp despite all evidence that he might be made from glass.
Leatherhead
April 29, 2026 at 05:47 pm
Don't get me wrong...I like Williams, but he's #4 right now. And I like Musgrave as the #2 TE, but as a #1TE, he doesn't help us in the run game like Kraft does.
If we don't take lots of injuries, we should be OK we what we have. But if we start taking injuries to guys like Jacobs, we could be in trouble. Ditto on the offensive line.
Bitternotsour
April 29, 2026 at 11:22 pm
My main point is the draft just ended. Free agents have been signed, We're in the interstitial space and it would be ok for you to not harp on possible bad outcomes for at least a few weeks.
You know, for the good of the order...
PhantomII
April 30, 2026 at 05:45 am
I'm more worried about our OL returning Tom from very serious injury...The only PROVEN good OL member we have and 4+ OL that probably would not even start on any other good NFL team....That and no answer for Kraft going down last season= Veteran presence at TE....to help out our so far underwhelming OL...
joejetson
April 29, 2026 at 07:54 pm
Not drafting a skill position is ok for this year. If they are truly in "Win Now" mode, this defense must be fixed NOW.
They are solid at the receiving corps. The depth may be young but are talented.
Musgrave is good enough as the TE depth for this season. They can add more next year.
RB's are good enough if the O-line improves it's run blocking. Remember, they picked up Wilson as an undrafted free agent. And Brooks is still here as the "passing down" back. There's always RB's out there that can be acquired.
It's nice having a premium talent like Jacobs, but other guys can do the job if required.
SicSemperTyrannis
May 01, 2026 at 09:26 am
Notice you say the O line needs to improve the run blocking but TE is good enough.
We need a blocking TE.
NoNonsense
April 30, 2026 at 04:34 am
There was 1 RB I really wish GB would have drafted this year that we might end up regretting not having the ammunition to draft and that was a guy named Demond Claiborne who the Vikings got in the 6th round at pick 198 just before GB took Domani Jackson at 201.
No idea if he was even a target in this draft but after seeing him go to the Vikings that kind of stings. He might be a bit of a fumbler with 5 last year but boy can that guy run. Got a minute go check out some highlights on this kid. Kinda hope he fumbles his way to the PS so we can snag him at some point in the future.