Remember These Signings When Judging the Banks & Hobbs Additions
There is no way the Aaron Banks and Nate Hobbs signings will be this bad.
By Dan Saia
We are officially in the slowest period on the NFL calendar, which makes it a great time to dive into the Packers’ history books. Brian Gutekunst made two big splashes in free agency this offseason with the additions of cornerback Nate Hobbs and guard Aaron Banks. Both are expected to step into starting roles and be major contributors to Green Bay’s success in 2025.
I was a big fan of the signings, and even though both players were handed sizable contracts, I think Gutekunst has done well with his free agency pickups all things considered. Let’s hope Hobbs and Banks can step in and make the same type of impact that Josh Jacobs and Xavier McKinney had on their respective sides of the ball a season ago. Only time will tell.
That got me thinking about some of the free agent pickups in Packers history that didn’t work out—players who came in with plenty of hype but quickly flamed out in Green Bay. This topic has been covered before, but with the Packers now seemingly annual players in the free agent market, it’s worth keeping these names top of mind. If nothing else, they serve as a reminder that any future pickup the Packers make surely can’t be as bad as some in the past. Like Banks and Hobbs, these players were once seen as plug-and-play solutions. It didn’t go that way.
Martellus Bennett
All Packers fans remember this and I have to admit—though I’m not proud of it now—I was a fan of this signing when it was first announced. Despite the fact that Bennett had already worn out his welcome with four other teams by the time he landed in Green Bay, the Packers were desperate for some continuity at the tight end position. Jermichael Finley’s career was long over, and Jared Cook had reminded us just how dangerous Rodgers could be with a competent tight end.
A 2014 Pro Bowler, Bennett was brought in with hopes of being the missing piece on offense. Instead, he became the exact opposite: a locker room cancer who didn’t even finish his only season in Green Bay. His three-year, $21 million contract was a shocker—especially since it was handed out by the ultra-conservative Ted Thompson.
All the Packers got in return? Just 24 receptions for 233 yards over 7 games before he was released for not disclosing a medical condition. Bennett later accused the Packers’ medical staff of trying to force him to play through a shoulder injury when he wanted surgery. He has since claimed he “forgets” he played for the Packers—and honestly, that’s probably for the best.
Sammy Watkins
The worst signing of the Brian Gutekunst era. Sammy Watkins was brought in to help fill the void left by Davante Adams and serve as a veteran leader for a wide receiver corps that included rookies Christian Watson and Romeo Doubs.
Unlike Bennett, Watkins didn’t get a big contract—just a one-year, $4 million deal. But the issue was that it was clear he just didn’t have it anymore, and he was taking valuable snaps away from the young guys. Coming off two uninspiring seasons with the Chiefs and Ravens, the Packers somehow thought he could help keep the offense afloat in what ended up being Aaron Rodgers’ final year in Green Bay.
Instead, Watkins played a handful of games, landed on injured reserve for a month, and was ultimately released after just 9 games with 13 catches for 206 yards. Woof.
Adrian Klemm
Maybe it’s just a coincidence, but all three of these players happened to be on the offensive side of the ball. Or perhaps it’s a result of the team spending so many high draft picks on defense over the years and assuming they could just plug holes on offense because they had an all-time great quarterback.
Regardless, on his way out, Mike Sherman made a mess of the team’s salary cap. As a way to clean it up, new GM Ted Thompson released Pro Bowl guard Mike Wahle and replaced him with Adrian Klemm. A three-time Super Bowl champion with the Patriots, Klemm was signed to a modest two-year, $2.6 million deal. The Packers thought they were getting a bargain. What they got instead was eight uninspiring starts—and then he was gone after just one season.
These are roundabout examples of how the Packers have completely changed their approach to free agency and the types of players they target. Instead of signing older, worn-down veterans they hope can squeeze out one more productive year (like Bennett and Watkins), or cheap stopgap replacements for former Pro Bowlers (like Klemm), the team is now targeting younger players who still have prime years ahead of them.
The Bennett and Watkins signings took valuable reps away from younger players who might’ve developed into long-term solutions. In both cases, the veterans didn’t even last a full season. Klemm lasted one year, but was so ineffective he got benched.
So remember these names the first time you’re ready to call Banks or Hobbs a bad signing this season. It can be worse—and it has been.
-Dan Saia




Comments (24)
GregC
June 19, 2025 at 02:39 pm
The Watkins signing was not a big deal--an inexpensive one-year contract. It was not such a bad idea to add a veteran to that very young group of WRs.
At any rate, it's way too early to say that Banks or Hobbs won't be bad signings. We simply don't know.
Vachio
June 19, 2025 at 07:00 pm
My problem was always that he was even on the field at all. I was cautiously optimistic at first, but watching him clearly and obviously running the wrong routes made me want to throw things at my screen. I was furious with the coaching staff over that.
Vanwe
June 24, 2025 at 08:26 am
We played him for 2/3 of our snaps in a grand total of two games before he got hurt. He actually played decently in those 2 games. Week 2 he had 93 yards. His major problem was always injury. He only had 2 more games the rest of the season when he played the majority of our snaps.
vagem55
June 19, 2025 at 03:05 pm
I am curious how much having an older QB played with signing some of these older veterans in the past, unlike the situation now.
splitpea1
June 19, 2025 at 03:23 pm
How did Joe Johnson escape this list? Just bad luck with the injuries I suppose, but still a colossal waste of money.
Hobbs was a necessary signing given our thin CB room; let's hope he can do a good job on the perimeter if needed.
Banks: I think Gute must have freaked out when he saw our OL troubles in the playoffs, as this signing is quite expensive--he'd better be worth it with that signing bonus.
Dan Saia
June 19, 2025 at 04:00 pm
All of the list include Joe Johnson. I thought that one was a little played out at this point
LLCHESTY
June 19, 2025 at 07:52 pm
Oops, should have read the comments! 💯 on Johnson, his contract as a % of the cap has to be the worst one in this century.
dobber
June 20, 2025 at 08:00 am
Yup. At the time, the length and money were a big deal.
T7Steve
June 20, 2025 at 06:15 am
"Hobbs was a necessary signing given our thin CB room; let's hope he can do a good job on the perimeter if needed."
I compare this to looking at like the Rasal Douglas signing. Gute's scouts see a guy on someone's practice squad and rejuvenate their career. I thought Douglass would be just a camp body or special teamer at best. Hobbs is way ahead of that and could turn out even better. Same thing with LB when he signed Campbell. If you can get an All-Pro season then move on when it's time, it's a win/win.
EricTorkelson
June 19, 2025 at 04:33 pm
Hey, let's not forget TE Jimmy Graham, who may have benefited from the Mart Bennet fiasco ... At age 33 the Packers gave Graham 30 million with 11 million guaranteed and for that they got 5 touchdowns in two years.
Vachio
June 19, 2025 at 07:01 pm
That one was tempered by the bears "stealing" him from us. lol!
dobber
June 20, 2025 at 08:03 am
Graham was exactly what his trajectory said he would be: a declining TE who was never an adequate blocker. The Packers have struggled to feature the TE since J-Mike got hurt, anyway, so this was a head-scratching signing.
LeotisHarris
June 19, 2025 at 05:49 pm
Well, as long as we're remembering some guys, I'll toss Jeff Saturday and Devin Funchess into the mix.
This would be a fun discussion to flip the script on, too. Like when we signed that injury prone cornerback with a bad attitude 2006. Guy worked out okay, I guess.
Vachio
June 19, 2025 at 07:03 pm
I hated the Bennett signing, but it was karmic retribution. It seemed like they tried to low-ball Jared Cook because Bennett was available. Ooof!
LLCHESTY
June 19, 2025 at 07:50 pm
How can Joe Johnson be left off this list??
MitchAnthony
June 19, 2025 at 09:03 pm
"He has since claimed he “forgets” he played for the Packers—and honestly, that’s probably for the best."
Great. Yes. Absolutely. So why don't we all forget him as well. The horrible photo showing him wearing the same number worn by Donald Driver should never be seen again. I'm talking Stalin era commie regime stuff. Scrub any photo or reference of this player from any Packer related everything for good. Like it never even happened. Let's all forget him as well. I'd be up for that.
The only people who should ever have knowledge of this player situation at any time in the future should be a scant few people in the front office who should be reminded of it the next time they think about signing a cancerous tumor to the Packers. Otherwise, we shall speak of him no more forever.
dobber
June 20, 2025 at 08:19 am
If Banks, Hobbs, or both turn out to be bad signings it will be on their own merits. Just because we can find signings that were gosh-awful in comparison, it won't make others less bad.
That said, people are pretty polarized on Banks. I think it was a very targeted signing for the Packers, which means they were likely to pay a little more for him. I think the skyrocketing cap and salary structures will make his contract look less scary within a year or so. If he avoids injury and plays on the trajectory he was on with SF, I don't worry about this signing.
The Hobbs contract isn't a high-end deal for a high-profile position, the cap hits are manageable, and they can get out of it fairly easily if he's a dud. I see Hobbs as more of a projection--I think they see him as a flexible piece for the secondary. He needs to stay healthy: as someone who has missed games in LV, that's the bigger concern for me. It could be his usage in GB might enable that.
Bearmeat
June 20, 2025 at 02:05 pm
If Banks ends up being the Next Billy Turner, this will be viewed as an excellent contract. When Gute signed Turner, it was looked at as an overpay. He gave us one eh year at OG and two good years at OT. A definite bargain.
The issue with the Hobbs signing, especially with Alexander gone, is availability. If any of the top 3 CBs aren’t available regularly (and Hobbs has a history of injury), it’s going to force Haddon, King etc. On the field. Yikes. The depth at CB is scary.
Leatherhead
June 21, 2025 at 08:40 am
Don't be scared. We only carry 4 CBs on the active roster, and the #4 guy doesn't play on defense unless there are injuries. Go around the league and look at the #4 CB on other teams and that should lessen your worry.
At this point, I'd say King has the inside track for the #4 spot.
Our secondary in the Eagles playoff game, where we held them to about a dozen short completions (13-21 for about 130 yards) was McKinney, Williams, Bullard, Nixon, and Valentine. Every one of them returns.
dobber
June 21, 2025 at 09:09 am
At this stage I'd say that the weekly actives will depend on how Bullard responds in season 2 and how the health of the S position holds up. Prior to 2024, the Packers were using CBs as their nickel and dime players. That shifted toward the safeties in 2024. It's stating the obvious to say it's all about health and availability, but if the safeties get beat up or regress, we'll likely see the Packers forced to activate and play more CBs.
HarryHodag
June 20, 2025 at 08:57 am
All GM's make good and bad free agent signings. The fans tend to remember the good ones and often simply forget about the others.
"Tightwad" Ted Thompson deserved the name. While he did make a few splashy free agent signings...like Charles Woodson...he liked to dabble in the marginal players in free agency, hoping to revive a caree at low cost. It often failed. One factor often forgotten is a player might excel in one system but is ill-adapted for another.
I chided TT on other message boards for trying to win the salary cap Super Bowl every year. The Packers often had an enormous amount of salary cap money yet he wanted to build through the draft primarily. I wonder if a few other key free agents had been signed along the way, especially on defense, if the team would have won a few more Super Bowls.
dobber
June 20, 2025 at 10:02 am
My opinion was that TTs cap management/player procurement strategies were set one or maybe two CBAs before he finished as GM. I didn't think he evolved in his management philosophy very much (even as he declined) as the rules shifted, and that left him with a different toolbox from other teams.
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 20, 2025 at 06:35 pm
Ted also added some great talent that were not originally guys drafted by Green Bay. I’m thinking of Ryan Pickett, Ryan Grant, Tramon Williams, and Al Harris.
11Bravo1p
June 20, 2025 at 10:40 pm
TT got Grant for a late round draft pick, Shields & Williams as undrafted free agents, Pickett & Woodson as free agents. But Bennett was the only acquisition i remember him being really praised for in the offseason. TT won the offseason by signing Bennett. Of course, once the season(s) began, everyone realized Shields, Williams, Pickett, Grant and Woodson were good pickups.