Packers Need a Dawg to Run the Defense
New DC needs to bring the attitude with them
By GregMeinholz

Finally, the Green Bay Packers had a defensive coordinator to be proud of. Not since the Green Bay heyday of Dom Capers in the early 2010's were the Packers very proud of what their defense brought to the table. It resulted in two failed new DC's post Capers' eventual downfall before they ever could say they had a championship defense. Jeff Hafley brought that to the Packers in 2024, and you could say his hiring was one of Matt LaFleur's best decisions as head coach of the team. But whenever a coordinator has a lot of success, the rest of the league takes notice, and eventually plucks them from your staff with a promotion.
Jeff Hafley is now the head coach of the Miami Dolphins. The post-Joe Barry dream come true has come to a crossroads. Everyone is now wondering who the Packers are going to bring in as their new defensive coordinator. And regardless of who they bring in at DC, is the defense going to take a step back or a step forward? Will we bring in another Jeff Hafley? Or will we end up bringing in another Joe Barry?
Heading into 2026, one of the biggest changes needed in Green Bay is a re-evaluation of how aggressive they want to be. Everyone will mainly point at the offense in this regard, wishing for the "All Gas, No Brake" approach to stop being all talk. While that does need to change, the defense needs to do its part as well. They need to be more aggressive in swarming the ball carrier as well as trying to force turnovers. While Hafley's defense certainly did well swarming to the ball in 2025, takeaways were back to being a rarity. In 2025, the Packers ranked 25th in takeaways compared to 2024's 6th. In 2023, they ranked 26th, and in 2022, they were at 11th. So, basically a teeter-totter of whether or not the Green Bay defense is good at creating turnovers yearly.
While saying "we want to be aggressive and intense" is a good line for the podium, it's also what every defensive coordinator you bring in for an interview is going to say. The Packers need to bring in a defensive coordinator who not only says the line, but also brings that aggression and intensity with them to every practice. You don't build that characteristic in your players by just saying the line.
There's a term that many of us are familiar with that has made its rounds in the sports world to describe a player who plays with that extra grit or aggressiveness, and it is that the player "has that dawg in them." While to be an aggressive defense, you need those "dawgs," it also helps to have coaches who have that dawg trait as well to push them along.
Hiring That Dawg
Ultimately, if I had my own personal choice of any defensive coach candidate who I would want the Packers to bring in as defensive coordinator to uphold this aggressive style, it would be former linebackers' coach under Jeff Hafley, Anthony Campanile. Campanile brought an intensity that seemed to help build Edgerrin Cooper in the NFL and also seemed to bring out a more aggressive style in Quay Walker. During my visits to training camp in the 2024 offseason, I constantly took note of how intense Campanile was.
Unfortunately for the Packers, Campanile's style was also noted by the rest of the league, and he is now the defensive coordinator for the Jacksonville Jaguars. Campanile also interviewed for the Baltimore Ravens' head coaching vacancy. So, even if Campanile were available, he might go the way of Jeff Hafley very quickly.
When it comes to real candidates who fit this aggressive style, the Packers may not need to look much further than their own coaching pool, with Demarcus Covington, currently the team's defensive line coach/run game coordinator. Covington has displayed the same aggressive philosophy as Jeff Hafley, and players have also credited Covington with pushing them to deliver that "dawg approach."
Other aggressive options from the outside could be Raheem Morris, Brian Flores, Jonathan Gannon, Jim Schwartz, Anthony Weaver, Christian Parker, and Jim Leonhard.
Everyone who watched the Badgers possess one of the top defenses in the nation years ago wants Jim Leonhard. Rightfully so, Leonhard is an aggressive, blitz-heavy defensive play-caller who coaches the same intensity he played. Leonhard could be a good candidate again after LaFleur nearly hired him a few years ago, but is he even on LaFleur's list after the previous denial?
Raheem Morris, Jim Schwartz, and Brian Flores are defensive-minded coaches who have also served as head coaches in the NFL. Along with their aggressive approach, they provide Matt LaFleur with something he lacked with Joe Barry, and that is stability. Matt LaFleur is an offensive-minded coach. He needs someone to take over the defense he can trust to do their thing without him having to interfere. A veteran coach like Morris, Schwartz, or Flores undoubtedly provides this.
Jonathan Gannon also falls into that category of defensive coordinators who have already coached in the NFL at a high level (former AZ head coach). It was reported late yesterday that Gannon is scheduled to interview with the Packers for the DC position. Gannon is another who brings intensity to the table. He calls his philosophy the "HITS Principle," centering around hustle, intensity, takeaways, and smart. However, Gannon is known to be a rather calm coach, which contrasts a bit with what he preaches and lacks a bit of the fire I personally believe the Packers' defense needs in a coach. But he does have a Super Bowl appearance to his credit, the last time he was a defensive coordinator with the Eagles in 2022, where his defense ranked high in total defense and scoring defense. So, if he brings that to Green Bay, we can overlook the lack of sideline fire.
Christian Parker is an aggressive and fundamentally sound defensive coach who has been on LaFleur's radar before and may be again. Currently, as the Eagles' passing game coordinator and defensive backs coach, I think the success of that unit in Philadelphia the last few seasons speaks for itself.
Lastly, before the Packers hired Jeff Hafley, I had Wink Martindale as a possible candidate. Coincidentally, Martindale could be a candidate this time around again, but I'm looking into a coach who learned from Martindale, Anthony Weaver. Weaver spent three years as the DC for Miami, but with the hiring of Hafley, Weaver may either stay or be available. Weaver provides experience as well as the same blitz-heavy and intense approach that the Packers may be looking for.
With star players like Micah Parsons and Xavier McKinney, as well as a rising star in Edgerrin Cooper, the Packers could be a desirable draw for defensive coordinator candidates. Each of those players is known for having an aggressive style, and they need an aggressive coach to match. We'll be looking for Matt LaFleur to make the right call in getting them just that.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________





Comments (67)
nygary
January 21, 2026 at 02:21 pm
I don't care how aggressive or tuff the new DC is. If they dont bring in some DT's who can stop the run this defense will struggle.
splitpea1
January 21, 2026 at 03:19 pm
How about another run-stuffing DT with attitude like Mike Daniels?
Coldworld
January 22, 2026 at 09:25 am
Interesting stat I saw. With Stackhouse on the field, out “run defense was 0.56 yards per snap better when he was on the field – the best among Green Bay’s regular defenders.” It’s not just who you have, but who you play.
Another: this year in Dallas Kenny Clark had “44 pressures; Karl Brooks (25) and Wyatt (22) combined for 47 to lead Green Bay’s defensive tackles.”
Those figures indicate how much we missed Clark and need to improve talent. However, they also suggest that we didn’t use what we had optimally and thus exaggerated our run failings on the interior DL. Hafley should have gone heavier at times and Stackhouse was more effective when used than the late season types too, at least versus the run.
Wooden and Brooks against the run was the flat out disaster one could predict based on size and past play. Brooks at least got some pressure. Brinson started out badly in the run game and looked like a guy unused to run downs throughout, but was still better than either overall. We need to ditch the idea that 300 pound IDL can be more than passing down players on a regular basis at both the FO and Coordinator levels.
The source article for the stats is here. https://www.si.com/nfl/packers/onsi/packers-2025-season-report-card-grad...
Leatherhead
January 21, 2026 at 02:25 pm
Please, not Gym Shorts.
We had a pretty good defense until the end of the season. Injuries to Parsons and Wynn didn't help, but for 3 quarters it was a pretty good defense. We lost some games early in the season when the defense played well and we couldn't score.
Most of the talent is returning. Everybody is more experienced. We have veterans on the field. There's no reason that our defense should be worse next year, unless we do stuff to make it worse.
Cheezehead72
January 21, 2026 at 02:45 pm
Leatherhead I would not mind getting Jim Schwartz. I did not like him when he was the HC of the Lions just because of how he acted on the sideline but he would be a good DC.
Leatherhead
January 21, 2026 at 04:08 pm
I think we should get a good DC who isn't a dick.
Brewcity_BearsFan
January 21, 2026 at 04:31 pm
I still vividly remember the radio interview Sitton was doing on the Fan, or maybe it was still WSSP at the time, and he called Schwarz a dick, and wouldn't want to play for him.
It was Thanksgiving week. The sound bite blew up. The Lions were not good. They rolled the Packers that coming Thursday.
As a Bears fan, I don't want Schwarz in GB. I think he is a great coordinator, terrible HC. Plus, the possibility of Garret maybe wanting to follow him, while I am mildly getting my hopes up about Maxx Crosby in Chicago, isn't a fun thought.
Coldworld
January 22, 2026 at 09:32 am
Schwarz works just fine for me, but the idea of him working for LaFleur suggests interesting watching. I just don’t see that relationship as made in heaven.
As to Crosby, that team has all manner of reasons to contort financially and in other ways to keep him there, not just on field ones. I don’t see them parting with him.
Packerpasty
January 21, 2026 at 06:42 pm
exactly...
Major Snafu
January 21, 2026 at 02:27 pm
I agree we ned a top dc coach but none in their right minds would come here with this lack of talent. Its a suicide mission. The only reason the pass d wasnt rated worse, tesms were sucessful running.
Funny how all the top playoff teams have more than one sucesdful pass rusher and line backers with quikness and mobility side to side. D backs thst can cover and tackle one on one
Leatherhead
January 21, 2026 at 04:13 pm
Lack of talent? Are you insane?
Parsons, possibly the best defensive player in the league, in a DE rotation that includes Gary, VanNess, and Enagbare.
McKinney, Pro Bowler.
Cooper, McDuffie, Walker....one of the best LB rotations in the league.
The talent was good enough to be a top 6 defense until key people got hurt. It should be again
TarynsEyes
January 21, 2026 at 05:52 pm
"Parsons, possibly the best defensive player in the league".
Geez, get off the BS train already. Parsons is as close as one can get to a one-trick pony as one can get. He's a pass rusher, nothing more. As for the other, a guy like Parsons is supposed to make it easier for others, assuming he does his job to expected levels weekly, and he doesn't more often than expected/allowed for. We have seen the lack in rise of play with other players, and that was before the injury excuses started to come into the offering box. And if you bring up sacks, Garrett would like a word, as would Watt, and a few others, who do much more than get sacks.
marpag1
January 22, 2026 at 01:05 am
Yeah, it totally sucks if the only thing a guy can do is completely demolish a play in 1.5 seconds flat.
I reiterate... this board REALLY needs an eyeroll icon.
dobber
January 22, 2026 at 07:41 am
To say he only rushes the passer is a pretty myopic view on what he does.
marpag1
January 22, 2026 at 09:02 am
Agreed... and I wasn't saying that. I would say he's "average-plus" vs. the run. But even if he was a complete cluster against the run he's still the best defender on the field in most every game.
It's like people who bitch that Deion Sanders couldn't tackle. Or that Adrian Peterson sucked in pass pro. LOL.
Dwight Freeney was an absolute dumpster fire vs. the run and he's in the HOF with 125 sacks.
Starrbrite
January 21, 2026 at 07:16 pm
I agree LH. Our offense was within a few scoring chances of making our d one of the best…and of course the injuries.
murf7777
January 22, 2026 at 08:15 am
Let’s keep in mind, our D was partially at fault in losing 4 double digit leads with 5 minutes left in the game. We need to do better, we have the talent, we need a strong, aggressive, smart leader of men to put us in the top 3 of the NFL. Then we will get to the SB. Top 10 isn’t good enough.
Coldworld
January 22, 2026 at 09:39 am
A D with heavy dose of Van Ness And Enagbare next year would be perhaps the least threatening in the league. It won’t happen.
Even if healthy, being that toothless undermines a good deal of what Parsons brings. Without Parsons those two scare no QB. Change has to come to the DE room, and not merely moving on from Gary.
Cheezehead72
January 21, 2026 at 02:48 pm
I believe Covington has the inside track to the job as long as MLF believes he can assemble a good staff. I have always liked Jim Leonhard and wished the Badgers would have made him HC but instead they decided to hire an Ohio State graduate and now you see where they are.
There are some fine candidates out there I just hope MLF picks the best one.
Since'75
January 21, 2026 at 03:33 pm
Apparently from what i've seen...
Can MLF pick one, or does the President have to approve it.
I mean, wasn't MLF hired by Murphy.
These aren't the Wolf, Thompson days....
When football people, made the football decisions.
Hell, the Packers haven't been able to sniff the Super Bowl, post Rodgers.
What happened to Gute's grand plan?
I know....not much.
Leatherhead
January 21, 2026 at 04:14 pm
The decision is LaFleur's, but you don't go far in this world by ignoring your boss and other key people in the organization.
Since'75
January 21, 2026 at 04:33 pm
Ok......
There was a time when the GM made football operation decisions.
Gute 'should be' MLF's boss, it's the natural hierarchy.
Policy is Gute's boss, he's the only one who can terminate him, which is correct
MLF should be able to pick his staff, period.
Now if he wants to run it by Gute, fine do that.
But that is as high as it goes.
**********
Hire people and let them do their job.
Example: Gute's job still has training wheels, compliments of Mark Murphy.
Gute can't make a football operation decision without getting the ok from....Daddy (Policy)
Gute should have made the decision on MLf's future
************
Rob Demovsky.....
"It’s the reason they’re the NFL’s second-winningest franchise since Bob Harlan gave Ron Wolf final say over all football matters in 1992. "
"From where yours truly sits, Policy’s best option is to go back to the previous structure, promote Gutekunst to head of football operations, and either extend LaFleur as well or leave the coach’s future in Gutekunst’s hands.
Leatherhead
January 21, 2026 at 04:52 pm
I think the GM, the prez, the HC, etc all have to work together. I’m pretty sure the HC gets to pick his staff. The GM does the player personnel stuff, and works hand in glove with the HC and the scouting department. If he wants to draft Jigantic Johnson, but the HC doesn’t want this guy, then the Prez has to get involved Better to have action by consensus.
Since'75
January 21, 2026 at 05:02 pm
Well, under Harlan's changing of football operational power, that translated into two SB's victory's.
I don't know what else to tell you LH.
Results matter.
Bitternotsour
January 21, 2026 at 06:06 pm
Arguably it's great if everyone agrees, but the coach needs to stay in his lane, and the personnel people in theirs. The President shouldn't have any fucking say whatsoever.
The personnel people know and understand the system their coach is running.
Coldworld
January 22, 2026 at 10:01 am
This isn’t an advertising agency, it’s sports team. One GM with full authority over the roster and the coaching of that through a coach of his choosing. A president who runs the business and decides if that GM needs replacing and, if he does, leads that process. Nothing more.
All decisions need to share the same vision, which needs to be consistent. No compromises, no management by majorities shifted by the reactions of Russ Ball or Ed Policy. Whether it should Gute or not is a legitimate question, but if Gute or a successor isn’t a person trusted to do that, then they should not have been hired.
Harlen was right. Murphy was wrong. Not just for the current individuals, but for the long term future. Singularity of vision and this of recruitment and on field approach, not compromise and discussion.
Accountability not collegial responsibility and no input by an accountant and sports lawyer on any football decisions. If there is advice needed advice then that’s what it should be, not peer input that has to be accommodated and adjusted for even if it undermines the objective.
Guam
January 21, 2026 at 08:07 pm
Yes they have to work together, but that is different than decision making by committee. The DC should be the HC's responsibility and decision. I have long managed organizations and lived by the principle "a camel is a horse designed by a committee". I want thoroughbreds, not camels.
Bitternotsour
January 22, 2026 at 09:14 am
exactly this. the coaching staff is the HC's responsibility. provide him a budget and a set of expectations, but the hire is his. player personnel belongs with the front office and GM, again, provide the cap parameters and get out of the way.
my objection to the management structure is that football OPERATIONS makes its way to the president's office. murphy set himself up as an owner.
stockholder
January 21, 2026 at 02:51 pm
I vote for Bryant Haines.
Vachio
January 21, 2026 at 06:17 pm
I had to google him. That's an excellent outside the box suggestion. I like it. I doubt that he's even on MLF's radar, but that could be a stroke of genius hire.
Since'61
January 21, 2026 at 03:00 pm
No matter who is hired for the DC role the Packers need better CBs and a better NT rotation or this defense will have the same weaknesses as the 2025 edition.
Thanks, Since ‘61
Green Bay Shareholder
January 22, 2026 at 11:46 am
Spot on as always - when was the last time we had a decent secondary despite the enormous amount of draft capital expended / probably the last time we won a Super Bowl !
GregC
January 21, 2026 at 03:19 pm
Several of these candidates look interesting. I agree that it would be good to see more aggression. I thought Hafley got overly reliant on the four-man pass rush at times this past season. As a result, they got few turnovers and got stuck out on the field for too long.
Since'75
January 21, 2026 at 03:20 pm
"The Packers screwed the pooch by not dealing ARod earlier and getting that roster reset." - dobber
I said back in 2020, to trade Rodgers when he asked to be traded, they could have got a
Kings ransom for him. See San Fran.
I wrote that ad nauseum down the hall at T.P. at the time. brought it up occasionally here also.
Since'75
January 21, 2026 at 03:22 pm
Forget the Dog....
To play like Dogs, you need dog players.
No offence Rashan.
Just an open question.
How many players away, are the Packers?
TarynsEyes
January 21, 2026 at 05:57 pm
"Just an open question.
How many players away, are the Packers?"
More than most here will accept as being true.
Doofapotamus
January 21, 2026 at 08:02 pm
The entire O-line except for Tom (and maybe Morgan at LT, we'll have to wait and see but the interior NEEDS to be addressed) a RB who can hit the hole and fly afterwards, a MLB that can actually cover the pass, a scheme that fits the CB's or a new round of aggressive CB's, a true monster run stuffing DT, a kicker than doesn't miss kicks every other game and multiple in the biggest game of the year and I think we're the best team in the NFL.
Since'75
January 22, 2026 at 06:06 am
So...you're saying we're more than one player away?
Not sold on Morgan at LT, just sayin.
MitchAnthony
January 21, 2026 at 11:13 pm
"No offence Rashan."
Whatta ya sayin'? Ya think Rashan is doggin' it?
Cause if you are, I'm with ya. Doggin' it all the way to the bank.
ThinkBig
January 21, 2026 at 03:51 pm
First off....Hafely did not play an aggressive defense besides the first two games of 2025! After that he went into a shell of soft zone and the defense even with Parson's couldn't get off the field....as evidenced by Cleveland, Dallas, Bengals, Cardinals, Panthers, Giants, Lions, Bears, Broncos, Bears....All these games we made the opposing teams QB look like all pro's! Or we made Tight Ends look unstoppable. Now you suggest Covington, who failed to come close to an acceptable defensive line (these are all NFL players) and failed to coach them up! On top of that Policy totally dropped the ball on Lafleur and Gutenkunst. Lafleur on to many occasions did not have the team prepared to play....5 losses in a row! Guntenkunst has whiffed on way to many first round and early draft choices and Policy decides on the same old same old for 2026 and the foreseeable future!
We haven't had a top Defensive Coordinator since Capers....he had one decent year (when we won the Super Bowl) and after that was a has been.....I guess you don't recall Kapernick running and throwing all over on us???
We do need an aggressive Defense, look at Seattle, Philadelphia, Rams, Houston, Carolina, Broncos.....need I say more, a defense that can get off the field!
Frustrated Rant!
Coldworld
January 22, 2026 at 10:08 am
Hafley followed a trend that each DC has under LaFleur. They start off aggressive and then get more and more worried about not giving up big plays. At some point it stretches credibility to look anywhere else for the explanation than LaFleur. It ties in with his trait of trying to do just enough on O to get by. It’s not credible to write it off as coincidental.
Hardly emblematic of an offensive guru who really believes in himself. Horribly disappointing in terms of D as well, both in absolute terms and trend over tenure. Hafley got out at the right time.
FumundaStank
January 22, 2026 at 10:37 am
MLF has stated often that he likes a conservative defense that doesn't give up the big plays. He loves the bend don't break defense mentality. He's pretty much hands off with the defense other than his desired style of play. if you watch the Rams defensive style of play it is almost identical to the Packers. The big difference is the Rams have much better players on defense than the Packers do. I would bet dollars to donuts whoever MLF hires will be playing the same style defense they do now. He just won't hire someone who advocates playing aggressive defense.
Alberta_Packer
January 21, 2026 at 05:22 pm
The D is far more in need of dawg players - than dawg coaches.
Rick5952
January 21, 2026 at 06:47 pm
Bingo!
murf7777
January 22, 2026 at 08:30 am
The Dawg coach won’t tolerate non-dawg players…..either you become a dawg or sit. A lot of it is attitude, a dawg mentality can be taught.
Alberta_Packer
January 22, 2026 at 12:55 pm
Like Dave "Killer" Carlson (Charlestown Chiefs)?
Brewcity_BearsFan
January 21, 2026 at 06:54 pm
In "Well that fucking sucks" news, the Vikings have resigned, and extended Flores.
dobber
January 21, 2026 at 07:09 pm
He could still get a HC job and leave the division.
Brewcity_BearsFan
January 21, 2026 at 07:32 pm
I am wondering if he thinks teams will not be willing to "Cross" the league, and hire him, while his lawsuit is still pending.
Of the teams with openings, the Steelers might be the only one willing to make that move.
Coldworld
January 22, 2026 at 10:15 am
He may not be too keen to be hired if he really thinks he can avoid contractually mandated arbitration.
pantz_bURp
January 21, 2026 at 07:09 pm
"Packers Need a Dawg to Run the Defense"...
We need more Dawgs on D and O who don't roll over when the gettens tough.
No humpin legz either, Save that energy for the game,, [UNLESS, the object of love is McManus's kicking leg...then show him some love].
Pantz
Since'75
January 22, 2026 at 06:11 am
Humping McManus's leg.....
The things that run through your mind.
I worry about you my man.
pantz_bURp
January 22, 2026 at 08:20 am
Don't worry about me S75...
Hey, great to see ya in men's clothes again!
Atta boy,
P
Since'75
January 24, 2026 at 08:58 am
I thought what i wear was just between us?
What happened to us...it's like, i don't even know you anymore.
pantz_bURp
February 05, 2026 at 12:16 pm
Your right, you don't know me anymore. But, your wife sure does... ;)
I kid because I care,
PB
Houndog
January 22, 2026 at 07:54 am
My best guess is that they will show McManus' leg some love, and the exit door!
dobber
January 21, 2026 at 07:12 pm
Brother Harris apparently interviewed today...
https://www.profootballrumors.com/2026/01/packers-interview-al-harris-fo...
That makes the confirmed list of requested/completed interviews:
Christian Parker, DBs/pass game coordinator, Philly
Johnathan Gannon, out of work former HC in Arizona (background in coaching DBs)
Daronte Jones, DBs/pass game coordinator, Minnesota
Al Harris, DBs/pass game coordinator, CHI
Sensing a trend? Hafley's background was in DBs as well.
I like this list.
Duneslick
January 21, 2026 at 08:07 pm
Sounds like none of these guys worked with the Def line and LBs to stop the run
Since'75
January 22, 2026 at 06:13 am
Looks like they are fixated on Def. back guys dobs.
dobber
January 22, 2026 at 07:45 am
It's a passing league...
Houndog
January 22, 2026 at 08:06 am
Oddly enough Since'75, that seems to be a league trend, D-Backs and Passing Game coaches climbing the ladder on D. It's not just GB.
Packers0808
January 22, 2026 at 07:38 am
Al Harris is the man they should hire, period. Guy has a fire in his gut and first job as DC nobody would know what to expect with new guy on the block!
dobber
January 22, 2026 at 07:45 am
On top of that--it would be a kick in the nads for the Bears.
Houndog
January 22, 2026 at 08:14 am
I don't know enough about Jim Leonhard other than what I've read here and then looked further. Everything has been positive!
But if he's as good as many people seem to think, and "is he even on LaFleur's list after the previous denial" is really a factor, then LaFleur is a Prima donna?
murf7777
January 22, 2026 at 08:33 am
Jim Leonhard has been highly successful in everything he’s done in his life. He’s also aggressive. I’d love that hire!
LambeauPlain
January 22, 2026 at 10:55 am
The Badgers Mac N Cheese now knows he made a horrible mistake not going with Jimmy and poorly vetting, then throwing the kitchen sink at Luke "Fizzle".
Jim did not turn down a Packers DC offer. His two day marathon talking with LaFleur was to decide if he did want to get into the specifics of one. He choose the stay with the Badgers with persuasion from his wife, Mom and Dad...all who believed he had a long future in Madison.
That is now moot. And after Sunday, should the Broncos go down, it would be incompetence if LaFleur did not interview Jim.
Strat
January 22, 2026 at 01:24 pm
I thought all these players were already "dawgs." They all say that. At the draft, free agents, even about each other "You gonna get a dawg on the field!" That's great. Lambeau Field/Dawg Park. Maybe they should catch a frisbee in their mouth at halftime. A different "dawg" every game. Now we need a dawg to lead the dawgs?
In a game where guys literally beat the living hell out of each other for 60 minutes, you better have a harder edge mentality permeating your coaching staff. They don't...at all. And the "Head Dawg" almost always ends up with his tail between his legs. LaPoodle doesn't lead by example because he can't. Why do you think he's constantly referred to as soft?
When your #12 and #13 first round picks, starters on the DL, are the caliber they are, and the CB's couldn't cover a $2 bet, how much bite are you going to have dawg?
Let them bring in whoever they want. Until they admit and accept the talent level they have is not that good overall, things will remain the same.
Woof.