Packer Snap Counts: Week 12 Vs. The 49ers

The Packers defeat a depleted and sloppy San Francisco team.

 

 

The Packers signed Alex McGough to the practice squad as a wide receiver and placed Marshawn Lloyd on the Non-Football Injury list due to an appendectomy.  The Packers did not elevate anyone from the practice squad.  Jaire Alexander and Edgerrin Cooper were inactive due to injury.  Kitan Olapado and in a surprise, Jacob Monk, were healthy scratches.  Travis Glover got on the field for the first time this year.  Coby Wooden was listed as questionable but he participated fully in practice on Friday, so the Packers decided not to elevate Jonathan Ford from the practice squad. 

 

OFFENSIVE LINEMEN:

Player Snaps % ST
Walker 72 100 6/24%
Rhyan 72 100 6/24%
Tom 68 94 6/24%
Myers 68 100  
Jenkins 68 100  
Telfort 5 6 2/11%
Glover 4 6 6/24%
Dillard 4 6 6/24%

 

The offensive line leaned on the 49ers and won the battle.  It was not a knockout but it was an easy decision on points.  The holes were not always gaping but there was usually a hole or at least a crease.  The Packers gained 169 yards on 42 carries (4.02-yard average), but in the first half when it mattered most, the Packers gained 125 yards on 23 carries, a 5.43-yard average.  The Packers allowed 2 sacks and a third that statistically was listed as a carry by Love.  All of the sacks were coverage sacks.  Love tried to escape up the middle a few times but San Francisco is too disciplined to allow quarterbacks to scramble up the middle.

 

 

RUNNING BACKS:

Players Snaps % STs
Jacobs 38 53  
Brooks 25 35 3/12%
Wilson 15 21  

 

Josh Jacobs looked like the real deal again.  He forced 15 missed tackles and gained a lot of yards after contact.  Jacobs finished with 106 yards on 26 carries, a 4.08-yard average.  Brooks again got more snaps than Emanuel Wilson but Wilson got more carries.  Wilson gained 41 yards on 9 carries (4.56/carry) and Brooks gained 11 yards on 4 carries (2.75-yard average).  Wilson gained a yard to convert a third down: that was a tough yard and he did it without lineman pushing him from behind.

 

TIGHT ENDS:

 

Player Snaps % ST
Kraft 57 79 10/40%
Sims 24 33 3/12%
Fitzpatrick 14 19 4/16%

 

Kraft caught both of his targets for 26 yards and a touchdown.  Kraft had been playing nearly every snap but Sims and Fitzpatrick got on the field more in this game, something that can only help them down the stretch.  Fitzpatrick caught 1 pass for 2 yards.  Sims had no targets.  The Packers played 1.32 tight ends per play on average.  There were a lot of 2 TE sets and some 3 TE sets.

 

QUARTERBACKS:

Player Snaps % ST
Love 68 94  
Willis 4 6  

 

Love completed 13 of 23 passes (56.5%) for 163 yards (7.09 yards/attempt) with 2 touchdowns, and no interceptions.  He had a passer rating of 107.7.  Watson dropped what should have been a 49 yard touchdown pass that would have improved Love's stat line.  Love threw some really nice, accurate passes, especially on third downs.   He scrambled one time for 2 yards.

The Packers forced 5 fumbles and recovered 2 of them.  They also intercepted a pass.  The Packers had no turnovers.  The 17 points the Packers scored in the first half all came after long drives.   In the second half, the Packers scored touchdowns on a 3-play, 26-yard drive after an interception by McKinney on a tipped pass, another 3-play, 16 yard drive after Van Ness forced a fumble and Clark recovered at the 16-yard line, and a 10-play, 56-yard drive after a forced fumble by Nixon that was recovered by Brooks.  Love had 2 turnover-worthy passes, including one that should have been intercepted easily, though Watson might have helped Love by playing defense.  On another play, the ball also became separated from Love's body while he was being tackled, but Love was able to double clutch and re-secure the ball before the ball hit the ground.    

 

WIDE RECEIVERS:

 

Player Snaps % ST
Watson 47 65  
Doubs 37 61  
Reed 36 50 3/12%
Wicks 28 39  
Melton 23 32 6/24%
Heath 15 21 3/12%

Doubs led the team with 54 receiving yards on 3 receptions, all of which converted third down opportunities. He did have a drop.  Doubs left the game with a head injury of some kind and did not return.  Reed caught all 3 of his targets for 26 yards.  Heath caught 2 passes for 25 yards, including a beautiful 12-yard fade for a touchdown.  Wicks caught 1 of 2 for 25 yards.  Watson did not catch any of his 3 targets, including a perfect pass deep that would have  been a 49 yard touchdown.  Watson did play some defense on one errant pass to help prevent an interception.  

I would like the offense to work in better rhythm.  That is, I would like to see the pass come out when Love's back foot hits the ground on his drop backs.  That requires the first option to be open.  It is nice that Love is able to go through his progressions since the offensive line generally affords him sufficient time to do that, and it is nice to have 4 or 5 quality wide receivers.      

 

 

DEFENSIVE LINEMEN:

 

Player Snaps % ST
Clark 23 47  
Wooden  21 43 2/8%
Brooks 20 41 5/20%
Slaton 19 39 8/32%
Wyatt 17 35  
       
Gary 26 53  
Cox 22 45 3/12%
Enagbare 19 35 8/32%
Van Ness 18 37 12/38%
Mosby 11 22 14/56%

 

The Packers held San Francisco to just 44 yards on 16 carries, a 2.75-yard average.  When it mattered most, the Packers only allowed a total of 3 yards on 4 carries in the first half.  The Packers only generated moderate pressure on Brandan Allen.  The snap counts are all pretty evenly spread.  Gary is still obviously the best DE, so the decision to even out those DE snaps is a little surprising.  It is less surprising in Clark's case, though he is still the best DT on the team.  Clark had 2 assisted tackles, a QB hit, and a fumble recovery.  Wooden had 2 solo tackles, including a tackle for loss in a surprising number of snaps.  Brooks had 1 assisted tackle and a fumble recovery.  Slaton had 2 tackles, 1 solo.  

Gary had 2 tackles (1 solo), a sack, a forced fumble, and he had a couple of pressures.  Cox had 1 assisted tackle and a forced fumble.  Enagbare had 2 assisted tackles.  Van Ness had 1 solo tackle, a sack, and a forced fumble.  The Packers only had 3 QB hits and 2 sacks.  That was enough in this game, anyway.  San Francisco was missing LT Trent Williams, who is a difference maker, but they did have 4 of their preferred starters and his replacement, Jaylon Moore, has in the past been a reasonably competent spot starter.  The 49ers got a steal when they drafted rookie RG Dominick Puni with the 86th pick, just two slots ahead of where the Packers took Marshawn Lloyd.  Puni came into the game with an 80.8 PFF grade.

Clark jumped offsides, while Van Ness, and Enagbare clearly lined up in the neutral zone.

 

LINEBACKERS:

 

Walker 43 88 2/8%
McDuffie 41 84 6/24%
Wilson 26 53 17/68%
Hopper 7 14 13/52%

 

Walker had 7 tackles (6 solo), including 2 tackles for loss, and a pass defensed, which he should have intercepted.  Quay was effective on some blitzes, causing some flushes that padded the stats of other players.  McDuffie had 3 assisted tackles.  Eric Wilson had 3 tackles (1 solo).  Hopper had no defensive statistics but he had a tackle on special teams.

The Packers decided not to elevate Jamin Davis, the former 19th pick in the first round, to replace Edgerrin Cooper's athleticism.  It remains to be seen whether Cooper (hamstring) can return in time for Thursday's game against Miami.

 

 

SECONDARY:

 

McKinney 43 88 9/36%
Nixon 43 88 5/20%
Bullard 41 84 9/36%
Ev Williams 36 73 7/28%
Valentine 30 61 7/28%
Stokes 26 53  
Anderson 6 12 17/68%
Ballentine 1 2 19/76%
Rochell     11/44%

 

McKinney had two enormous plays, an interception and a pass break up on a fourth down play,  McKinney added 3 solo tackles.  Bullard had 7 tackles (6 solo).  Nixon had 3 assisted tackles and a big forced fumble.  Williams had 3 tackles (2 solo).  Valentine and Stokes each had 1 solo tackle.  Stokes often rotated with Valentine, as the Packers continue to give Stokes snaps for reasons unknown.  Anderson and Ballentine had no defensive statistics but Ballentine had a forced fumble on special teams.  

 

SPECIAL TEAMS:

McManus made a 51-yard field goal and all 5 of his extra points.  Whelan averaged 48.8 yards per punt with 1 inside the 20, but his net was only 38 yards.  

 

PFF THINKS I AM AN IDIOT (Maybe You Do Too): 

 

PFF loved this performance.   The top five performances were 1. WR Malik Heath: 92.3; 2. LG Elgton Jenkins: 86.6; 3. RB Josh Jacobs: 86.3; 4. RT Zach Tom: 78.8; 5. RB Emanuel Wilson: 75.9.  Jenkins gave up a sack and had a holding penalty.  PFF has not been kind to Jenkins in recent games.  Wilson forced 3 missed tackles. 

The bottom five were: 1. RG Sean Rhyan: 33.8; 2. WR Christian Watson: 47.1; 3. TE Ben Sims: 55.6; 4. RB Chris Brooks: 57.7; 5. WR Bo Melton: 58.2.  None of these are too surprising.  55.6 is apparently what PFF gives a tight end if his blocking is average and he has no targets.  Rhyan being that low is a little surprising.  Brooks got nicked for the 15-yard tripping penalty.

The top 5 on defense were: 1. LB Quay Walker: 91.4; 2. CB Javon Bullard: 84.9; 3. CB Keisean Nixon: 83.2; 4. DE Lukas Van Ness: 82.9; 5. DE Brenton Cox Jr.: 79.9.  When a team only gives up 10 points, the grades are likely to be good.  Van Ness and Cox surprise me a little.  The secondary did such a good job on the opposing receivers, so I expected to see more of them in the top 5, including McKinney.  Deebo only had 1 reception for 21 yards (and it was on the flea flicker), while Jennings was limited to 40 yards on 7 targets.  Kittle is the only receiver who hurt the Packers, checking in with 82 yards and a touchdown on 6 targets (and 6 receptions).  Their explanations make some sense.  Van Ness had 2 pressures and a strip sack on 10 pass rushing snaps.  Nixon allowed no receptions and had the forced fumble.  I thought Quay had a good game; PFF credited him with 6 run stops though 2 of them were wiped out by penalties.  Bullard was solid in the slot.

The bottom 5 were:  1. CB Carrington Valentine: 29.5; 2. CB Eric Stokes: 47.8; 3. DL Colby Wooden: 48.5; 4. DE Kingsley Enagbare: 54.5; 5. DL Devonte Wyatt: 54.9.  PFF did not think much of Valentine or even Stokes.  PFF indicated that Valentine was responsible for 3 receptions for 68 yards, including Kittle's 31-yard reception.  Kittle was lined up against Valentine and got a step on him, so I suppose.  Stokes gave up no receptions but had the lowest run grade on the team.  Well, that's why he never plays special teams.  Wyatt had a hurry and a QB hit as he turns into a pass rush specialist.  You can see Zach Kruse's full article on the best and worst graded Packers by clicking here.   

Photo courtesy of Dan Powers, USA Today.  

RB: 1.08

TE: 1.32

WR:  2.58

DT:  2.17

DE: 2.09

LB: 2.54 (a big number)

DB: 4.34

 

 

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (46)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Ya_tittle's picture

November 25, 2024 at 01:38 pm

Thought you said Monk was inactive. How did he get snaps?

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 25, 2024 at 01:47 pm

Thanks for noticing. Just too accustomed to writing Monk's name. Fixed.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:41 pm

Perhaps they felt Glover could play RT as well as emergency G? Dillard is now supposedly only a LT and Telfort appears to be a G now? Otherwise I’m surprised Monk was inactive, though if it means Glover is progressing, that’s positive too.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 25, 2024 at 01:56 pm

I noticed that and thought maybe it was some other person.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 25, 2024 at 02:01 pm

"Gary is still obviously the best DE, so the decision to even out those DE snaps is a little surprising"

I think they were limiting exposure as much as possible to ease up the workload on the short week.

If we'd have needed to overwork or even give them the normal percentages to fight out a win it probably would show up on Thursday, don't you think?

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 25, 2024 at 02:37 pm

That seems likely. Good idea with the short week.

It is more obvious on offense where they put Glover, Telfort and Dillard in for the final possession, which consisted of 4 runs up the middle by Emanuel Wilson for 9 yards. That did not help his yards per carry average any. And it looks like Heath and Melton got more snaps, though Doubs was out of the game as well. Kraft had been around 90% so Fitzpatrick and Sims probably got more than normal.

Not quite as obvious on defense. Hopper and Zayne Anderson got 7 and 6 snaps, respectively, and Ballentine got 1.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:43 pm

The RG on the last drive didn’t seem too effective in the run game live, though without rewatching, it could be partly the RT as well.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:24 pm

Astute comment, Steve.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

November 25, 2024 at 02:18 pm

Thankful it wasn't the Packers killing themselves with penalties this game. They beat a crappy backup QB instead of the backup having a career day against GB.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

November 25, 2024 at 02:56 pm

You forget the Packers won 3 games with their back up QB. And also won games with their best DB injured in games as well.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 25, 2024 at 02:46 pm

Doubs has a concussion. Jacobs left the game for a while with cramps. I somehow forgot to mention that the Packers went 5 for 5 in the red zone. Only 5 penalties. I couldn't remember who tipped the pass that McKinney intercepted.

0 points
0
0
Ya_tittle's picture

November 25, 2024 at 03:45 pm

Niner Deebo tipped the pass.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:46 pm

It was Mosby who likely caused the miss I believe. # 53.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

November 25, 2024 at 06:05 pm

It went off Deebo Samuel's hands, but Isaiah McDuffie may have helped cause the incompletion by getting his hands on Samuel's arms just as the ball arrived. Even watching in slow motion, it's hard to be sure if McDuffie affected the play.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 25, 2024 at 03:25 pm

I was surprised that Cox was so highly rated by PFF - he was the one who lost contain on SF's longest run when he bit on the fake and then got sealed inside by a WR. Cox certainly has been the beneficiary of the P. Smith trade - he went from inactive every week to getting significant snaps every week (second most of the DE's this week). It will be interesting to see what he adds to the defense over the rest of the season.

Stokes looked like he can still play pass defense, but he sure doesn't seem to like contact. As LH has noted - too many business decisions in run support. Too bad because he could become an asset versus the pass.

Does anyone know Musgrave's status? Sure would like to see him back as neither Sims nor Fitzpatrick offer much as a receiver.

O-line looked good but pray for no injuries. Monk was a darling of preseason, then wasn't inserted when Myers was hurt (team preferred to shuffle the entire IOL rather than put him in) and now he was consigned to the inactive list this week. Not a good trend line for Mr. Monk. Anyone have any insight to what has happened?

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:23 pm

Agreed on Cox and LVN. I thought Cox and LVN's positive plays were mostly set up by other players rather than because they beat their opponent. Gary flushed Brandon Allen who got sacked when he stepped up in the pocket. I thought Quay had some rushed that benefited others. 3 QB hits and 2 sacks is not a lot, though SF did only run 46 snaps, so aggregate numbers will be down.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:51 pm

Monk is a smaller school guy who only converted to C at the end of his college career. He needs to add some mass and muscle, but he’s also had a pretty steep learning curve from where he started to this O as well as a technical journey. I speculated above that Glover might have got the nod as he can play RT and G in a pinch (Dillard seems to be left only now). Either way, I’m not particularly surprised that Monk is taking time.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 25, 2024 at 11:02 pm

The functional strength I knew about coming from Duke (he really doesn't need mass, he was 320 lbs his senior year), but I would have thought he would have picked up on the blocking assignments by now as he is a bright guy. However he seems to be sliding down the depth chart rather than ascending it after several months with the team and I expected the opposite.

Ordinarily I wouldn't be concerned with a fifth round draft choice taking his first year as a development year, but the Packer O-line depth is really thin right now. I guess I was hoping someone knew about an injury that wasn't serious but was holding him back or some similar situation.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 26, 2024 at 06:15 am

Monk was 308 when tested. You could be right, and perhaps he is dropping, but I think it’s just as likely that they have alternate centers already out there and don’t have a true swing T. Thus cover requires 2 T capable players and one or two of those activated may be seen as as good or better at G at this point. Monk is probably primarily seen as a C at this point. In some ways I hope that is what they are focusing him on.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 26, 2024 at 08:08 am

Given Myers somewhat uncertain future with the Packers I was hoping Monk might be his replacement and was hoping he might get some playing time this season. If he is dropping that scenario seems less likely. The 2T issue is legitimate but that argument has also been true all year so why inactivate him now? I may be making a mountain out of a molehill but I just haven't any positive signs that Monk may a future starter.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 26, 2024 at 08:57 am

Editors note: you're making a mountain out of a molehill.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 26, 2024 at 09:32 am

Thanks Bitter........

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 26, 2024 at 10:25 am

keeping it occasionally real since 2012

0 points
0
0
Bear's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:05 pm

TGR : Thanks again I appreciate your work/comments. Living in Northern California and being a Packer fan for 60 plus years is not easy where I live.

0 points
0
0
Bearmeat's picture

November 25, 2024 at 04:57 pm

LVN being being Enagbare in snaps, again, is an eye opener. He is quickly trending towards bust territory. Also, I just don’t understand Stokes being on the field almost as many snaps as Valentine. Stokes is absolutely a bust. He should not be on the field.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

November 25, 2024 at 06:08 pm

Well, Stokes did not allow any completions in the game, so maybe he is not completely useless.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 25, 2024 at 06:22 pm

I think they're just trying to get something out of Stokes, at this point. He's not a terrible cover guy but he doesn't want to get hurt again and it shows. When the playoffs start, he'll be down to a few snaps a game unless somebody else gets hurt.

Right now....sadly, IMO...he's one of our Top 11 tacklers. Add in Van Ness, Clark, and Slaton, , and Often-Injured Alexander, and that's pretty much the guys we want on the field most of the time.

For the curious, our Top 15 tacklers would be:

Walker, Bullard, McDuffie, McKinney, Cooper
Nixon, Wilson, Williams, Gary, Stokes,
Enagbare, VanNess, Clark,Slaton, Valentine.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 26, 2024 at 06:22 am

Stokes is a physical press man corner who is no longer physical. He’s also being used in zone and off coverage a lot. Perhaps it’s a career decision, but I suspect those injuries have unfortunately left a mental scar. It happens to some players. Perhaps it wears off, perhaps not. I would be quite happy to see Rochell given chances at this point.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 26, 2024 at 07:43 am

I'd be happiest to see Stokes become Stokes again. Those physical issues can linger, it may not be mental at all.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 25, 2024 at 06:06 pm

The distribution of snaps along the defensive line confirms what I'd thought since before training camp: We're going to be able to throw a good, talented, 8 man rotation at teams all season long. We're reasonably fresh and healthy on the Dline, and it's getting to that point in the season where being fresh in the 4th quarter is going to count for a lot.

Even the Bears game, on the critical possession, we got consecutive sacks and then should have had another but Enagbare tried to launch a high kill shot, Williams ducked him and threw the completion that kept them alive. We don't look tired or slow, even in the 4th quarter, even after 11 games. This will pay dividends, as surely as it's hot in Texas in July.

I'm going to throw out a theory on Stokes, and you tell me what you think.

I think Stokes had a decent rookie year, and then missed most of the next two seasons with injuries, and he won't be back here next year, and he'll have more value as a FA if he can stay healthy, including the playoffs. I think he's making business decisions and priority #1 is not breaking himself again. It shows.

BUT.....you have to try to find a use for what you have. We're not paying him a lot, and it wouldn't really be a big savings if he weren't on the team, but this is the piece of "scrap lumber", so to speak, that you'd like to get some use from. He's not a horrible cover guy, but I'm not sure he could tackle me without giving up some yards after contact.

Look, I hope he makes three interceptions in the Super Bowl. I don't like to watch him but I understand the Packers are trying to get something out of him. That's why he's on the field. If you put him on a special teams coverage unit, knowing he's going to avoid contact, that's just not a smart idea, IMO. That's why he doesn't play special teams.

SSSSSSS

Regarding Love's numbers.......What would they have looked like if the bomb hadn't bounced off Watson? Another 60+ yards and a TD? My only gripe with Love is he's got to do a better job of protecting the ball. He's got great skill position guys around him, he's got excellent blocking, and he's got a defense that will keep him in the game. But not if he's going to turn it over.

Also, did you see the graphic about the Packers redzone possessions with, and without, penalties? We're one of the best redzone teams in the league....when we don't stop ourselves with a penalty. Or have one of our league-leading drops. Nobody's stopping the Packers except the Packers. They are the youngest team in the league, so that certainly could happen.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

November 25, 2024 at 06:13 pm

Using a passer rating calculator, I plugged the 49-yard TD pass into Love's numbers, and his passer rating for the game goes from 107.7 to 127.17. If you want to get greedy and remove the two incompletions that occurred after that drop by Watson, Love's passer rating goes up to 135.32.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 26, 2024 at 01:30 pm

One dropped pass makes that big of a difference.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

November 25, 2024 at 06:56 pm

Regarding your Stokes theory, it sounds entirely plausible, although being in a contract year may not have anything to do with his avoidance of contact. It may be a simple matter of trying to survive out there. I was hoping his confidence would return as the season progressed, but it hasn't happened yet, and at this point, it looks like it won't happen at all.

0 points
0
0
TOMMY'63's picture

November 25, 2024 at 08:14 pm

For curiosity, what happened to our supporter,Croat? Haven't seen his comments for along time? Was he offended from someone, or lost the desire to make his voice heard. Anyone know about his disaperance?

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 26, 2024 at 05:47 am

Hadn't thought about him in a long time, now that you mention him.

Hope it doesn't have to do with the war over there. Probably does though. Outside communication is pretty hard to do when you're in a war zone I bet.

Wish him the best regardless and hope he's back here soon and can prove me wrong.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 26, 2024 at 06:23 am

Last time he posted that I recall, he did say he’d been extremely busy with his business I think.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 26, 2024 at 07:40 am

Croatia is not Ukraine. "Over there" is maybe not quite the same as you are envisioning it.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 26, 2024 at 10:06 am

I thought Russia was occupying Croatia as they work around the other countries to get at and defend themselves against Ukraine? Not at war with them but using their turf weather they like it or not.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 26, 2024 at 11:45 am

Nope. Croatia is just across the Adriatic from Italy and not near the Ukraine. Russia would have to go through the Ukraine and most of the Balkans to get to Croatia.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

November 26, 2024 at 12:21 pm

If Russia were in Croatia it would no longer be a proxy battle, but a world war. Even Americans would begin to understand the implications

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 26, 2024 at 01:24 pm

What country am I thinking of that Russia swallowed up? Right at the tip of my....fingers. Might have to actually look at a map.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 26, 2024 at 01:26 pm

I think you might have confused Croatia with Crimea. The Russians have been occupying Crimea for a while, Croatia is a ways away from that.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 26, 2024 at 01:48 pm

Thanks. That's the one I was thinking of. Well, I'm glad he's not there.

Still hope he's doing good.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 26, 2024 at 05:28 pm

Serbia, not Croatia. They are in the NATO Alliance, not enablers of Genocide.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

November 25, 2024 at 08:23 pm

Dontayvion Wicks played 28 snaps, so he must have been in there a fair amount before Romeo Doubs got hurt. I don't recall Wicks having the ball thrown his way until he made that 25-yard reception in the 4th quarter. And he only played three more snaps than Bo Melton.

I agree with TGR that there are not enough passes in rhythm. Love is still having to make a lot of difficult throws and quite a few difficult decisions. There is very little that is automatic about our passing game. It's still a good passing game, but it would be nice to have more easy stuff in there.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 26, 2024 at 05:56 am

It's getting better every week. As he gets more comfortable without injuries and full practices it's starting to show.

They just can't get in the rut of trying the same plays all the time regardless of the Ds they're facing. It's good to show stuff you've been trying to keep them honest but, how many times are they going to keep trying the jet sweep with Reed or Melton on crucial downs? All the Ds have been waiting for it since the third game. Lots of plays work off that motion, so they need to give it a rest for a while and keep the ball in the RBs' hands.

0 points
0
0