McCord V. Drones Could Be Most Intriguing Training Camp Battle

Which QB will break camp with Green Bay?

The Green Bay Packers may have just solved the top of their quarterback depth chart for the 2026 season, but that does not mean the position lacks intrigue heading into training camp. With Jordan Love firmly entrenched as the franchise quarterback and veteran Tyrod Taylor now expected to serve as the experienced backup, the spotlight suddenly shifts to a fascinating developmental battle further down the depth chart. The Battle between second year man Kyle McCord and rookie Kyron Drones.

At first glance, a competition for the QB3 role might not seem like the most compelling storyline of the summer for a team with Super Bowl aspirations. But in Green Bay, where quarterback development has become almost an organizational trademark, this battle could quietly become the most intriguing roster competition in all of camp. The Packers have a long history of investing in quarterback rooms, developing talent patiently, and finding value where other organizations fail to look. Whether it was Aaron Rodgers sitting behind Brett Favre, Jordan Love developing behind Rodgers, or Malik Willis resurrecting his career after arriving in Green Bay, the Packers consistently prove they value quarterback growth as much as immediate production.

Now the organization has two vastly different young passers competing for what could realistically become a long-term spot in Matt LaFleur’s offense. With Tyrol Taylor likely just a one-year stopgap at 37 years old, the need for a long term backup still exists.

McCord and Drones could not be more different stylistically, and that contrast is exactly what makes this competition so fascinating.

McCord arrives in Green Bay with the more polished passing résumé. The former Ohio State and Syracuse quarterback was one of college football’s most productive passers during his final collegiate season, throwing for 4,779 yards and 34 touchdowns at Syracuse in 2024 while completing 66 percent of his passes. After originally being drafted by the Philadelphia Eagles in the sixth round of the 2025 NFL Draft, McCord eventually landed in Green Bay on a reserve/futures contract earlier this offseason. 

Drones, meanwhile, represents the classic high-upside developmental project. The former Virginia Tech quarterback went undrafted but immediately caught Green Bay’s attention because of his athletic profile and physical tools. The Packers even hosted him on a Top-30 pre-draft visit, signaling legitimate interest long before the draft concluded. He was revealed as the “mystery quarterback” that visited Green Bay. At over 220 pounds with excellent mobility and a powerful arm, Drones fits the mold of the modern dual-threat quarterback that NFL teams increasingly covet.

This is not simply a battle between two quarterbacks. It is a battle between two developmental philosophies. McCord wins with timing, rhythm, and structure. Drones wins with traits, improvisation, and athletic upside. For Packers fans, it will be a fascinating glimpse into what Green Bay values most in its quarterback pipeline moving forward.The easy assumption entering camp is that McCord has the advantage. He is the more accomplished passer right now and likely the more NFL-ready quarterback. His experience operating high-level passing offenses at Ohio State and Syracuse gives him a significant edge in terms of processing coverages and functioning within structure. McCord has already shown at the college level that he can distribute the football efficiently and handle a heavy passing workload. That matters tremendously in Matt LaFleur’s offense.

LaFleur’s system demands precision from the quarterback position. Timing throws, anticipation, pre-snap recognition, and quick decision-making are critical components of the offense. The Packers are not asking quarterbacks to simply play backyard football. They want the offense operated efficiently and on schedule. McCord appears naturally suited for that style.

His accuracy in the short-to-intermediate passing game stands out immediately on film. He throws with anticipation and demonstrates a willingness to attack the middle of the field. His mechanics are clean, and he generally remains composed in the pocket. Those are traits coaches love in developmental quarterbacks because they provide a stable baseline to build upon.

However, McCord’s ceiling may also be more limited.

Athletically, he simply does not possess nearly the same dynamic traits as Drones. He is more of a traditional pocket passer who relies on timing and decision-making rather than playmaking ability outside structure. In today’s NFL, where quarterbacks increasingly create explosive plays with their legs and improvisation skills, that can cap a player’s long-term upside.

That is where Drones becomes so intriguing.

Physically, Drones may possess the most raw talent in the Packers quarterback room outside of Jordan Love himself. His arm strength jumps off the screen, and his mobility adds an entirely different dimension to the offense. During his collegiate career, Drones rushed for over 1,800 yards and 22 touchdowns while showcasing the ability to extend plays and create explosive moments with his legs. As we have seen in recent years with Malik Willis, Green Bay clearly values those traits.

The Packers have increasingly gravitated toward athletic quarterbacks under LaFleur. Love is an excellent athlete. Malik Willis brought mobility and improvisational ability to the room before departing in free agency. Even Taylor, despite his age, still provides movement skills and off-script playmaking ability. Drones fits that archetype perfectly.

The issue, of course, is refinement and development.

His passing consistency remains a major question mark. He completed under 60 percent of his passes during his college career and struggled at times with accuracy and decision-making. His mechanics can become erratic, especially under pressure, and he still has considerable work to do processing defenses from the pocket. With time in an NFL system, can he develop the skills necessary to be a playable quaterback in this league?

McCord may currently be the better quarterback. Drones may ultimately possess the higher ceiling.

There is also a practical roster-building component at play here. With Taylor now signed as the veteran backup behind Love, roster spots become increasingly valuable. Carrying three quarterbacks on the active roster is no longer automatic around the NFL, especially when teams want additional flexibility elsewhere.

The practice squad could become the likely landing spot for whichever quarterback loses the battle, assuming another team does not attempt to claim them. But even that scenario comes with risk. Developmental quarterbacks with intriguing traits often attract attention around the league, particularly after preseason games.

How they perform in the three August preseason games  will be telling. Love will be very limited as in seasons past. Taylor is a 15 year vet who will only need a handful of snaps. McCord and Drones will take the lions share of snaps. McCord will likely look smoother operating within the offense. He should deliver cleaner timing throws and demonstrate better command at the line of scrimmage. Coaches will trust him to execute the offense correctly.

Drones, however, may produce the splash plays.

The long scrambles. The off-platform throws. The explosive improvisational moments that energize a sideline. Those flashes can quickly alter perceptions during camp battles, especially when evaluating developmental players. If it plays out how we think, Gutey and Co will need to decide whether to keep the quarterback who looks ready now Or the quarterback who might become something special with enough time and coaching

The competition also speaks to the health of the Packers organization overall. Teams with stable quarterback situations can afford to invest in long-term projects. Green Bay is no longer desperately searching for answers at the position. Love has established himself as the face of the franchise, allowing the Packers to patiently cultivate developmental talent behind him.

That patience has historically served the organization well.

Few franchises in football have developed quarterbacks as consistently as Green Bay. The infrastructure matters. The coaching matters. The stability matters. Young quarterbacks entering this environment have an opportunity to grow without being rushed onto the field before they are ready.

McCord gets a chance to refine his game in a quarterback-friendly offense under LaFleur. Drones gets an opportunity to develop his raw tools without immediate pressure to play. Both players benefit from learning behind Love and Taylor while competing against each other every day in practice.

By the time training camp arrives, this may quietly become the most watched position battle on the roster.

Not because either quarterback is expected to play meaningful snaps in 2026. Not because Green Bay has uncertainty atop the depth chart. But because the battle represents something larger: the Packers continuing their relentless search for quarterback depth and future developmental value.

-Dan Saia

NFL Categories: 
1 points
 

Comments (12)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
Coldworld's picture

May 07, 2026 at 10:38 am

The battle for developmental PS 3rd QB may be fun, but I sincerely hope it’s not the most important. It will perhaps add some interest to the later parts of preseason games.

5 points
5
0
Cheezehead72's picture

May 07, 2026 at 10:51 am

This is how it will pan out. They will cut both. Neither of the two will be on the initial 53. If a team takes one the other will be brought onto the PS. Now it is very possible that neither one gets picked up being that teams generally sign the QBs they had in camp unless their QBs do not meet expectations. The QB position is too important not to bring back guys that know the organization and playbook.

That means there is a good chance both get past the initial waivers. In that case the Packers might have a decision to make. Its very possible they bring both back to the PS and decide later if needed.

7 points
7
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2026 at 12:21 pm

I believe the battles for starting C, CB, DL, Edge, and K will be bring more intrigue for players who will likely play in 17+ games this season with good health.

If the Packers need either McCord or Drones this season as the starter for several games, we will be looking forward to the 2027 season.

2 points
2
0
Coldworld's picture

May 07, 2026 at 01:51 pm

You forgot the TE battle behind Kraft.

Oh! Wait, my mistake. That one has been cancelled in favor of wishful thinking and prayer.

2 points
2
0
LambeauPlain's picture

May 07, 2026 at 02:10 pm

Yeah, agree...would LaFleur ever let Josh Whyle supplant Musgrave as #2 with a solid camp?

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

May 07, 2026 at 03:57 pm

We can do better than Whyle, and particularly as a blocker. Offensively, he was a move coming in and that’s perhaps worth developing, as long as we drop the blocking pretense that’s been all TEs since Lewis except Kraft.

0 points
0
0
PackerBackerAZ's picture

May 07, 2026 at 02:57 pm

The most intriguing battle? Possibly Jordan Morgan battling to be the left tackle. Maybe Cisse battling Valentine for starting cornerback . Certainly not the Packers third string practice squad qb. Don't care how many words you put out, that just isn't right.

2 points
2
0
ricky's picture

May 07, 2026 at 03:36 pm

When you were writing about Drones, I couldn't help but think of Favre. The cannon of an arm; off balance throws; improvisation that was called "Favre-ian" because no other QB could make those insane plays. Along with the boneheaded plays that would just drive you absolutely nuts.
But the guy was one of a kind, who loved football, loved playing and simply didn't care about anything but winning. If Drones can give out a third of that, the Packers have a keeper.

1 points
1
0
PackEyedOptimist's picture

May 07, 2026 at 03:51 pm

Excellent article Dan!
I agree that those two could end up getting a lot of media focus during the preseason, simply because that’s who viewers SEE during the broadcast.
I’m a huge fan of Drones and his potential, but if he struggles with the playbook or process, he might not get many opportunities.

1 points
1
0
golfpacker61's picture

May 07, 2026 at 06:35 pm

I doubt that the "battle" between these 2 QBs gets alot of attention. My view is if the model is to be like Aaron Rodgers, one of the best QBs ever, then McCord will be the winner. He is more of a Rodgers type of QB by far. Rodgers wasn't a great runner at all, but he could extend plays and he passed so well on the run, either direction.

While having a mobile QB would be an advantage in certain situations, it would be quickly offset if said QB can only complete 55% of his passes. Alot of potential NFL QBs had rocket arms and never accomplished squat.

The real positional battles that will make a difference on whether we are a legitimate threat or an also ran, will be CB, Edge, and solid backups on the OL. We absolutely have to be better @ CB because even Parsons can't make below average players even average. GB has made a great start to rebuilding that position group into a team strength.

Edge is the other big battle to watch. Who will emerge as #2, #3, & #4 on the depth chart. I just read an article describing GBs biggest off-season need as Edge rusher because of Parson's uncertainty. I don't know if it's the biggest need, but Edge is far from the strongest position group,yes we have Parsons, but after him we have the perennial "looking to make a jump" LVN, and then basically 3 rookies with potential. I would be in favor of eliminating the need by signing Clowney or Epenesa. Either is cheap insurance and well worth the $2-5 million it would cost. And on the plays Parsons comes off the field, we still have a pass rush.

TE would be a battle to watch if we actually added a combo blocking king/receiving TE to the mix. Musgrave isn't the answer, he had his big chance last year and didn't run with it. The UDFA Maryland has the talent to let us move on from Musgrave. I have said it multiple times, the TE we need that would fill the blocking TE role and upgrade the whole room is dangling in Dallas, Luke Schoonmaker. They want to move on from him, offer Musgrave in a player for player trade. Both players need a fresh start, but Schoonmaker would be an upgrade for us. With Kraft, Schoonmaker, Whyle, and Maryland as a group, there would actually be a battle after Kraft.

1 points
1
0
Alberta_Packer's picture

May 07, 2026 at 10:46 pm

Is it serendipity that there are 2 Virginia Hokies QBs vying for the backup QB position? One in the last chapter of his career - the other just beginning his NFL journey. With both being somewhat the same - stylistically. It would make for a remarkable succession plan if it worked out

1 points
1
0
Mike Rossmeier's picture

May 12, 2026 at 11:51 pm

With all the big guarantees handed out to Undrafted Packer rookies, from the list I saw Drones got only $15,000. So not in demand around the league. Descripton reminds me of Aaron Brooks - all kinds of potential but never realized.

0 points
0
0