Is There Room for Chris Brooks On the Packers 2025 Roster?
By GilMartin

Running back Chris Brooks seemingly came from nowhere last season to contribute to the Green Bay Packers offense. He became a reliable player as the team’s third running back and earned the praise of coaches and teammates. But as training camp approaches in 2025, there may not be room for Brooks on the team’s roster. So, will Chris Brooks be back with the Packers in 2025?
The Packers signed Brooks to the practice squad after the Dolphins released him in early September. He spent 2023 with Miami and appeared in nine games. Brooks carried the ball 19 times for 106 yards which is a healthy 5.6-yard average.
When third-round draft choice MarShawn Lloyd went down with an injury early in the season, Brooks was added to the 53-man roster. He quickly found a role because he could do one thing the coaching staff valued better than any other running back on the roster: pass protect.
Brooks picked up the playbook quickly and did an excellent job of picking up stunts and pass rushers. Keeping Jordan Love upright and healthy remains a top priority for Matt LaFleur and the coaching staff. The failure to pick up blitzers limited the reps of past Packers rookie running backs like Aaron Jones. Eventually, Jones worked hard at his blocking and gained the trust of the coaching staff.
It didn’t take long for LaFleur to become impressed by Brooks. “He’s really intelligent so he’s picked up our protections no problem. I’m excited about him,” the coach said last season.
He also liked the way he carried the ball. “I love his running style. He runs with a good forward lean,” LaFleur added. “He’s got great body control. He can stick his foot in the ground; he’s one of those one-cut runners.”
Brooks was successful running the ball. He carried the football 36 times for 183 yards. That’s a 5.1-yard average per carry which was the best among Packers backs last season. He also scored his first career NFL touchdown in Week 16 against the Saints.
But there may not be room for Brooks on the roster. Last season, the Packers kept three running backs on the 53-man roster and an additional one or two kept on the practice squad. Based on that math, there may not be enough room on the roster for Brooks.
Josh Jacobs will again be the top running back on the roster. He gained more than 1,300 yards rushing in his first season as a Packer and looks to build on that in 2025.
Emanuel Wilson was the second running back last season. He gained 502 yards on 103 carries, a 4.9-yard average per rush. Wilson did a good job as the team’s second running back and hopes to maintain that position again this season.
Last season, it was Lloyd’s injury that led to Brooks being added to the lineup. The third-round pick out of USC played in just one game before injuries ended his season. The front office and coaching staff were excited about Lloyd’s potential. His running style offers a nice contrast to Jacobs’ and his speed and burst make him a threat to break a long run on any play.
But if the Packers keep three running backs, one of the top four will have to be released. The most likely candidate would be Brooks, although his pass blocking ability may inspire GM Brian Gutekunst and LaFleur to keep a fourth running back on the 53-man roster.
They could also try to sneak Brooks on the practice squad, but that means he would have to pass through waivers first and there is a chance another team would claim him.
It will be up to Brooks to make the decision as difficult as possible for the team when final cuts are made in September. A strong training camp and preseason will be critical if Brooks hopes to stay in Green Bay in 2025. He faces a real challenge to make the roster this season.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
You can follow Gil Martin on Twitter @GilPackers
__________________________




Comments (22)
T7Steve
July 10, 2025 at 09:56 am
Seems to be a nice problem to have. Too many good players fighting for roster spots is better than having to make do with what you have or go shopping. First, we have to see how many make it through camp, but I hope that won't be the deciding factor.
norcaljoe
July 17, 2025 at 07:27 am
I agree Steve. We know Wilson and Brooks are capable backups for Jacobs. Lloyd will also be in the mix for snaps in PS games.
Ideally - keep 3 on the 53 and put I on the PS. I don't think Wilson or Brooks would clear waivers, and probably not Lloyd. It is a good problem to have, but it makes roster cutdown even harder.
Another possibility is trading one of the three guys before the season starts. That seems like a long shot though.
Anyway - yeah, it is a nice problem to have. And as much as I love Jacobs, it would be good for him to take fewer snaps this year to lengthen his career. The guy takes a lot of punishment. All the more reason to identify one guy as the main backup.
ricky
July 10, 2025 at 10:14 am
If the Packers are going to go with Morgan at LT, which is apparently their hope, having a RB that can block could become crucial. There is always a learning curve, such as Aaron Jones and Rasheed Walker. Having someone who could be effective against a defender who slipped past the LT, or stopping a DB blitz rather than letting the guy get an unimpeded path to Love could become necessary. Although after looking around online, it seems that Wilson has become a very proficient blocker. Which is good for the team, but could make Brooks expendable.
norcaljoe
July 17, 2025 at 07:29 am
Good points Ricky. Wilson is a better blocker than Brooks. No idea about Lloyd. It would be great if they could keep Wilson, Brooks, and Lloyd - with one on the PS. The problem - none of these guys are likely to clear waivers.
Coldworld
July 10, 2025 at 11:11 am
Yes there is a chance, but the best one is if Lloyd can’t demonstrate he can block. Brooks isn’t the athlete that the others are. He is there primarily for third down plays and as an extra protector, not to spell Jacobs. If Lloyd grabs that role (in addition to adding an outside the tackles threat and as a threat to run if passed to in space) then Brooks would either need an injury to someone or them to keep 4 backs.
I think Brooks would make the PS unless a team desperately needs a protection specialist. Teams usually pounce for elite athletes at RB or hold onto their own for the 53 to start the season.
BuckyBadger
July 10, 2025 at 11:37 am
Jacobs and baring a set back Lloyd are the only locks for the roster. Wilson was the 2nd last year but that was last year. Brooks will have the chance to play himself into that 3rd spot this preseason. He will probably get plenty of chances as well. Nothing is in stone in July.
TKWorldWide
July 10, 2025 at 01:53 pm
Agreed. It’ll be him vs Wilson unless injuries eff things up.
Or maybe it’ll be Brooks vs the “last” tight end prospect? Good problem to have, says I.
Coldworld
July 10, 2025 at 04:36 pm
My guess is that the last TE will be the best blocker, in line and lead. We seemingly accept the need to free Kraft from such duties more often and Musgrave is not a particularly plausible candidate to take that on. Sims and Fitzgerald have been so-so as blockers. They need to have taken serious steps to improve or face a challenge from Swinson and even Lumpkin who are big blocking first types. The 3rd TE was a non factor offensively last year and likely won’t be this year: it’s a dirty work role on an O with plenty of weapons.
Leatherhead
July 10, 2025 at 11:43 am
Jacobs, and probably Wilson, won't play that much in the exhibition games. It's going to be a prime opportunity for Brooks, Lloyd, and the rest to state their cases behind a 3rd string line. If they want to make the 53 man roster, they'll have to stay healthy through training camp and the exhibitions.
I could see us keeping 4, but more probably we'll only keep 3, and if Lloyd stays healthy, he'll almost certainly make the 53.
TKWorldWide
July 10, 2025 at 01:54 pm
Right. And since the FB position is as good as extinct…
GregC
July 10, 2025 at 12:11 pm
As of right now, I would keep all four RBs. Lloyd will need to stay healthy and learn how to pass block if he's going to play early in the season. Otherwise he will be a game day inactive. If Lloyd is not getting serious playing time by halfway through the season, that will be disappointing. But I think he will.
If they are not able to keep four RBs, I think they will need to cut Brooks though.
Cheezehead72
July 10, 2025 at 12:43 pm
Jacobs is RB1, Llyod will be given every chance to be RB2, so that leaves Brooks and Wilson competing for RB3. I say that only because the Packers will keep Llyod on the 53. Jacobs is the only back that will see very limited or no preseason reps. The other three will prove themselves in camp and preseason games. That being the case one of them could get injured so the decision would be easy to make. Now if we get through camp and preseason with all of them healthy it will be whoever is best at pass pro and special teams.
I like Brooks more than Wilson. I too like his running style. He is the the of back that is not afraid to put a hurting on a defender. He is the only one of the four that is over 6 ft. The other three have similar body types. Both Brooks and Wilson are 3rd year players. I would like to see them keep all four but I know that probably will not happen. I do not care which one they keep just as long as they keep the right one.
Leatherhead
July 10, 2025 at 01:04 pm
I'm not understanding how Lloyd, or anybody else, is leapfrogging over Wilson.
Wilson was 2nd on the team in touches last year. He averaged 4.9 yards/rush. He did not have a single turnover. He was not charged with a single penalty. He was available for all 17 games. He caught 11 of 14 targets.
And yet, we're just going to sit him down in favor of somebody else.? I don't think so.
GregC
July 10, 2025 at 01:42 pm
Last year at this time, you were defending A.J. Dillon. Moving on from him was one of the best things the Packers did. At least Wilson, unlike Dillon, is actually a good player, but Lloyd could bring something different to the offense. Let's see what he can do in training camp and the preseason games. The Packers will probably use three RBs anyway, as they did last year. Wilson and Lloyd could be 2A and 2B--each of them used a little differently, depending on the situation.
Leatherhead
July 10, 2025 at 02:53 pm
Dillon was a damn good #2 back for us. Always available, never fumbled, assignment sure. I'm a Packer fan, so I'm definitely going to defend him from people that throw crap at him because he wasn't Aaron Jones, v. 2.0. He was a #2 back. And a good one. Just like Wilson.
Your 2A and 2B scenario....what is that based on? Last year, 2A got 114 touches and 2B got 47. In 2023, 2A (Dillon) got 200 touches, and 2B (Patrick Taylor), got 43. The Packers don't do 2A and 2B; they give it to the #1 guy a lot, and they give it to the #2 guy a half dozen times/game.
BTW, Dillon got 800 yards from scrimmage his final season. When we moved on, his replacement got 550 yards. So yeah, moving on from him was one of the best things the Packers did, along with moving on from Aaron Jones.
I absolutely cannot understand why alleged "fans" have to disparage guys who were good players for us.
GregC
July 10, 2025 at 03:16 pm
I wasn't disparaging Dillon, I was just pointing out that he wasn't a good player, at least not by NFL standards. His YPC declined every year, down to 3.4 in 2023, which is a full yard below the league average. Wilson averaged 4.9 last year. Dillon got a lot of carries in 2023 because Aaron Jones missed much of the season, and the coaches didn't trust Wilson at that point. Dillon then became a free agent and got no offers, so the Packers took him back on a minimum salary. He got injured in training camp, so we may never know if he had a chance to make the team.
Leatherhead
July 11, 2025 at 08:17 am
He wasn't a good player? He showed up for every game and practice and put 3000 yards of offense together in four years....AS A BACKUP!!!! He didn't fumble, he didn't get the QB killed by failing to pick up people.
I think he's a good player. Apparently, the Eagles think so too.
BuckyBadger
July 11, 2025 at 07:41 am
Dillon was slow and fell short of his draft status. He was a 2nd round pick.
Leatherhead
July 12, 2025 at 07:43 am
Once again, I'm amazed that we keep winning games when we have so many poor players on it.
Coldworld
July 10, 2025 at 04:42 pm
I don’t think Lloyd will leapfrog Wilson because I don’t think that’s his challenge or value and thus is a contention mostly rooted in a misconception.
Wilson is a guy who can come in and play as if Jacobs were. Lloyd is a player who potentially brings a different dimension to compliment the between the tackles game of Jacobs/Wilson. Wilson was extremely good at that last year.
Whether that is RB 2 or 3 in terms of listing is immaterial, that’s the reality in terms of role if all 3 are on the roster.
Bitternotsour
July 10, 2025 at 07:17 pm
depends on if MLF utilizes all the tools in the toolbox. there is a multiplicity of weapons.
pantz_bURp
July 10, 2025 at 04:30 pm
Yes, there is room for Brooks. You know how I know?
I just got done watching A River Runs Through It.
She hate me,
Pantz