If The Packers Can't Get Josh Sweat, Why Not Go After Cameron Jordan?
Josh Sweat is not the only impact edge rusher the Packers can add at this point in the offseason.
By Dan Saia
The Green Bay Packers enter the 2026 season with legitimate Super Bowl aspirations. General Manager Brian Gutekunst has spent years constructing one of the NFL's youngest and most talented rosters, and the window to compete for a championship is wide open. However, as every contender knows, there is always room to improve, particularly when it comes to affecting opposing quarterbacks.
One name that has frequently surfaced in trade speculation this week is Josh Sweat. The veteran edge rusher remains one of the league's most productive pass rushers and would be an ideal addition to a Green Bay defense looking for another difference-maker on the edge. Unfortunately, acquiring a player of Sweat's caliber is easier said than done. Up to this point the Cardinals have shown little incentive to deal him. Even after he came out and name checked the Packers as his preferred destination, reports today signaled that is not going to happen.
If Green Bay ultimately finds itself unable to land Sweat, and they still really want to upgrade their edge room. Perhaps the better question is this: why not pursue free agent Cameron Jordan?
At first glance, some fans may dismiss the idea. Jordan is 36 years old and entering the twilight of a remarkable NFL career. In a league obsessed with youth, adding a veteran defender on the backside of his career isn't always viewed as an exciting move. But championship teams are built by identifying value, and Jordan may represent one of the best values available for a contender looking to strengthen its pass rush.
The Packers have invested heavily in their defensive front over the past several years yet still feel like they are always in the market for more. With the news today that Micah Parsons wont see the field until at least mid-October, the Packers are looking at a 5-6 game stretch without him to start the season. Lukas Van Ness continues to develop into a larger contributor and should take a step in his absence. The additions of young talent through the draft have provided depth, but one thing became clear throughout the 2025 season: Green Bay still lacked a consistent secondary pass-rushing threat when offenses focused their attention on Parsons and when Parsons was out.
Too often, opposing offensive lines were able to slide protection toward Green Bay's top rusher and force other defenders to win one-on-one matchups. While there were flashes from several players like Barryn Sorrell and Brenton Cox Jr, the Packers never consistently generated the kind of four-man pressure that championship defenses rely upon.
That is why Josh Sweat became such an appealing target. He is still in his prime and has demonstrated the ability to produce double-digit sacks while drawing significant attention from opposing offenses.
However, if Sweat proves unattainable, Green Bay shouldn't simply stand pat. The objective isn't necessarily to find the next Josh Sweat. The objective is to improve the pass rush.
Jordan can still help accomplish that goal.
One of the biggest misconceptions surrounding veteran players is that once they reach a certain age, they are automatically washed up. While age-related decline is real, every player ages differently.
Jordan is not the dominant force he was during his All-Pro seasons with New Orleans. Those days are behind him. But he has shown he can still be an effective NFL pass rusher. He enjoyed somewhat of a resurgent 2025 season. Racking up 10.5 sacks, 2 forced fumbles and 47 total tackles. Perhaps most impressive was he was able to play in all 17 games for the Saints.
Even late into his career, Jordan has continued to display the technical refinement that made him one of the league's most respected defensive ends. His hand usage remains elite. His football intelligence is exceptional. He understands leverage, blocking schemes, and offensive tendencies as well as any defender in football.
Those traits don't disappear simply because a player turns 36.
While his explosiveness may not be what it once was, Jordan has evolved his game. He wins with technique, experience, and preparation. Those qualities can still create problems for offensive tackles, especially when he isn't being asked to carry the entire pass-rushing workload.
Perhaps the strongest argument for signing Jordan is that Green Bay would not need him to be the player he was five years ago.
The Packers wouldn't be bringing him in to play 80 percent of the defensive snaps. They wouldn't need him to record 15 sacks. They wouldn't even need him to be their best edge defender.
Instead, Jordan could thrive in a rotational role.
Imagine a defensive line rotation to start the season featuring Van Ness, Sorrell and Jordan. Once Parsons is back in the fold that would only free up Jordan’s role. Defensive coordinator Jonathan Gannon would have the flexibility to keep players fresh throughout games while creating favorable pass-rushing situations.
Jordan's snap count could be carefully managed, allowing him to focus on obvious passing downs where his veteran savvy could shine. Fewer snaps often translates to greater efficiency for aging players, and Green Bay would be in a position to maximize whatever Jordan has left.
Championship teams frequently utilize experienced veterans in specialized roles. Jordan could fit that mold perfectly.
One aspect of Jordan's value that won't show up on the stat sheet is leadership.
The Packers still have one of the youngest rosters in the NFL. While that youth has fueled their rise into contention, there is undeniable value in adding proven veterans who have experienced everything the league can offer.
Jordan has played in countless high-pressure situations. He has been a team captain. He has battled through adversity. He understands the preparation required to sustain excellence over a long NFL season.
Young players often benefit tremendously from observing how future Hall of Fame-caliber veterans approach their craft.
For players like Van Ness, Sorrell and DDS and Green Bay's other younger defensive linemen, having daily access to Jordan's knowledge could accelerate their development. His impact in the meeting room and practice field could be nearly as valuable as his production on Sundays.
When teams are trying to make the leap from playoff contender to Super Bowl champion, those intangibles matter.
Of course cost is the key to everything in this world. How much would it take to talk Jordan into leaving the only home he ever know to come to Green Bay? While Acquiring Sweat would likely require significant draft capital and a substantial financial commitment for not just this year but through 2028. Jordan would only cost money and not nearly as much as Sweat.
At this stage of his career, he would likely command a short-term contract that carries far less risk. It is reported he has a standing contract offer on the table from the Saints but they remain “apart” in terms of money and on field role. Sportrac is projecting his 2026 contract as a 1-year deal worth $6.5-8 million dollars. The Packers still have roughly $28 million in usable cap space for 2026.
Gutekunst has done an excellent job maintaining Green Bay's roster balance. Committing significant resources to one player can sometimes create challenges elsewhere. A veteran addition like Jordan could provide meaningful improvement while preserving future roster-building flexibility.
The reality is that Green Bay doesn't necessarily need another long-term building block.
They already have plenty of those.
Jordan Love is entering his prime. The offense features young playmakers throughout the roster. The defense is loaded with players who are either entering or approaching their peak years.
What the Packers need is help right now.
That is where Jordan becomes intriguing.
Not every acquisition has to be about the next five years. Sometimes the best moves are designed to maximize the current championship window.
The Packers don't need Cameron Jordan to become a franchise cornerstone. They need him to help them win meaningful football games in January.
For a player with his résumé, experience, and remaining pass-rush ability, that is a realistic expectation.
There is no question Josh Sweat would be the more exciting acquisition. He is younger, more explosive, and capable of serving as a foundational defensive piece for years to come.
But if Green Bay cannot land Sweat, the search for pass-rush help shouldn't end there.
Cameron Jordan offers something different. He brings experience, leadership, proven production, and the ability to contribute in a specialized role without requiring a massive financial investment.
The Packers have built a roster capable of competing for a Super Bowl today. Sometimes the final pieces of a championship puzzle aren't flashy blockbuster additions. Sometimes they're smart veteran acquisitions that strengthen weaknesses and elevate everyone around them.
If Josh Sweat isn't available, Cameron Jordan may be exactly the type of move that helps push Green Bay one step closer to another Lombardi Trophy.
-Dan Saia




Comments (27)
WestCoastPackerBacker
June 04, 2026 at 11:11 am
Won’t it get too confusing? Jordan Love and Jordan Morgan and now you’re suggesting another Jordan?
splitpea1
June 04, 2026 at 11:26 am
Pros: Has been a very durable and productive player during his career and would provide true veteran leadership; unlike Sweat, has no potentially worrisome prior knee injuries; sometimes sports cool, spooky-looking gray dreadlocks.
Con: Has previously stated his strong dislike of cold weather, so the Packers might not be high on his preferred list of places to play.
Leatherhead
June 04, 2026 at 11:33 am
1061 plays run against the defense last year. Assuming you want a DE/EDGE at each end of the line, that means we need 2122 snaps from our DE/EDGE unit.
Parsons, in 13 games, had 707, and if he misses the first four games this season, he'll have to play every other game to reach 13. . Van Ness, in 9 games, had 263 snaps. Between the two of them they do not have half the snaps that we need at that position.
Gary is gone. Enagbare is gone. Between them they played over 1000 snaps. So we need to not only replace their snaps, but we need another guy to fill out the roster, play some snaps on defense but mostly on special teams.
And who do we have?. Oliver and Sorrell, who are two guys that we drafted last year and have spent a year developing. Mosby and Cox, who've been around the track a few times
So: Parsons with 700 snaps
Van Ness with maybe 600 snaps
The two backups Oliver and Sorrell, 350 each
That brings us up to less than 200 snaps of what we'll need (about 6 per game) , and we can add one guy to the gameday roster, like a Mosby or Cox or someone.
Coldworld
June 04, 2026 at 12:11 pm
If I wanted Jordan I would not have hung onto Van Ness. Then again, I would not have taken up Van Ness’ option and this opportunity is one reason why I would not have tied us to him that way.
GregC
June 04, 2026 at 12:20 pm
Dan makes a good case, although the article is about three times as long as it needed to be.
Alberta_Packer
June 04, 2026 at 12:36 pm
Packers primary focus should now be on O-line depth - not Edge - which is amply bodied.
Major Snafu
June 04, 2026 at 02:46 pm
I was on the Van Ness band wagon for three years thinking the guy has the skills but needs the coaching. Last year when he got hurt he came back over weight and slow and did nothing. I too have now given up its hopeless, the guy just isnt smart enough to figure out how to pass rush with skill.
Coldworld
June 04, 2026 at 04:26 pm
So more Paris than Hercules?
dobber
June 05, 2026 at 08:50 am
Fubared has a new handle?
golfpacker61
June 04, 2026 at 04:34 pm
Jordan is another vet that could easily work for GB because, just like Clowney or Sweat, GB only needs him for a year. And because these guys would only play 35-40% of the snaps, all of our young guys could play a lot of snaps too, so they are still getting developed. You could add Epenesa to the same % of snaps although he is only 27 and could be signed for 2-3 and he would be the cheapest of all 4.
I really like A J Epenesa if he is healthy, but Clowney for 1 year and $5 million is the best bargain. And playing across from Parsons I can easily see him getting 10 sacks, as well as playing strong rush defense. It kind of sounds like Jordan wants $6-10 million and that's too much for him.
Sweat is the best deal in total, if we could get him and Benson for a 4th round pick, but also because We only need him for a year and he would be an easy trade next year if he didn't want to restructure his contract for less money. I really think if he would have another solid season across from Parsons, Edge needy teams might fork over a 3rd round pick or maybe a 4th & a 7th.
Clowney carries the least amount of risk and the most reward for the money we would pay him. I would sign him tomorrow and just buy the insurance.
WD
June 04, 2026 at 07:04 pm
I agree with you that Sweat and Benson is the move to make. It is a matter of negotiations. Without Jacobs and Parsons this team will have a difficult time making the playoffs and no chance to win the division.
HarryHodag
June 04, 2026 at 04:43 pm
Affordability and salary cap are concerns. There's more money to be spent yet(Kraft). But if he would play for less money, he would make a good addition.
Nix the Sweat talk. Arizona made it clear he's going nowhere.
I also think acquiring a veteran could slow the development of some younger players like Sorrell.
golfpacker61
June 04, 2026 at 07:54 pm
Cleveland said Garret wasn't going anywhere too Harry. And look what happened? I would only make the Sweat trade under 2 conditions.
#1 GB trades LVN for Sweat and Arizona includes Trey Benson.
#2 GB trades a 2027 4th round pick for Sweat & Trey Benson
If we make this trade it has to be a good value for us, period.
Otherwise just sign Clowney for $5 million and be done with it.
None of Sweat, Clowney, Epenesa or Jordan will play more than 40% of the snaps, so none of the young guys that deserve snaps will miss out on huge development this year. None of these vets would "stunt the growth" of the younger pass rushers. In fact our young players who barely are wet behind the ears would benefit greatly by a veterans leadership.
Coldworld
June 05, 2026 at 09:34 am
I don’t buy the no trade talk. That’s been heard many times and proved wrong, and more officially than via Rappaport. However, after the Watson deal, until we know how that effects the cap, it’s impossible to know if we have room for a player like Sweat after locking up Kraft, which must be the priority.
While I would only take Sweat in a trade for Van Ness and that would lessen the real cap addition at least next year, we still need the Watson contract details to see if it’s even viable.
stockholder
June 04, 2026 at 05:10 pm
You could have kept and moved Walker.
This will resolve itself.
WD
June 04, 2026 at 06:56 pm
As we know the Rams just signed arguably the best defensive end in the league from Cleveland. That said, our window is closing fast and we need to sign Josh Sweat.
We have an advantage as he wants to sign with the Packers. If it takes a day two draft pick to get him it is well worth it. Clearly the Rams are serious and they don't rally care much about draft picks. They just get the players they want.
Starrbrite
June 05, 2026 at 01:04 am
Right —the Rams show no fear of the cap and/or trading draft picks. The trend is an emphasis on win now. I’m good with that.
Coldworld
June 05, 2026 at 09:40 am
They are going all out while Stafford holds up and probably that is as long as their coach will remain with them too by the sound of it. Why not? They know their window is short and they know their past dealings will continue due in about the same timeframe too. Then it is likely tear down whatever they do. So, sensibly, they are going all out and I don’t blame them at this point.
Lphill
June 05, 2026 at 06:39 am
a deal probably would have been done for Sweat except running back is an issue now with Jacob's future in limbo.
TXCHEESE
June 05, 2026 at 08:09 am
Obviously, gotta wait until the whole Jacobs situation shakes out. It's quite possible, there was a tiff, but overblown by the accuser. If this does drag out, I wonder what GB would have to give up to get Wilson back from Seattle.
As for Sweat, you can't have too many pass rushers. If he can be had for a fair price, go get him. IT. IS. TIME!
golfpacker61
June 05, 2026 at 08:46 am
Wilson was signed as insurance TX. I have read articles that he is now RB4 or 5 for them at this point and there is a good chance he gets cut. Wouldn't that be the $hits if he ended up back in GB and became RB1 if Jacobs is released? Or an even more stupid scenario is that he gets cut by the Seahawks and GB already found their RBs.
I thought I read GB would have had to pay Wilson$2-3 million to keep him, if he is released we could sign him for $1 million. Whether we trade for Sweat or not, I still like Trey Benson or James Connor from Arizona, if he is healthy. Benson is much younger and oozes with potential. Allen from the Jets, if he is an option, would be a great young talent to take a swing on. They were both Top 5 talent in the 2024 draft. A 6th or 7th would be like stealing them.
I would hate for Sweat to end up with the Bears, that alone might be enough reason to make the trade. But to me the beauty would be GB could use him for a year, until the young guys pick up valuable game experience, and then trading him to the AFC in 2027. The best of both worlds is getting an above average rental Edge who upgrades the position and then trade him for at worst a 4th or at best a 3rd in 2027. Teams always need good pass rushers and his $18 million is about normal for a fair Edge today.
Coldworld
June 05, 2026 at 09:17 am
You keep stating Wilson is on the outs. That’s not what I’m hearing from people I know out there, despite missing some time for a bereavement. What I hearing is that he is expected be the power back with Price being what we hoped Lloyd would be but increasingly hoped to be the lead.
Wilson is in effect battling with Holani, and he’s been a better player and is a much bigger and more powerful man. Let’s put it this way, I have zero interest in signing Holani. I’d back either of Strong or Martinez over him. Right now I’m hearing it’s Price, Wilson, Holani, in that order, going into the season.
Charbonnet may eventually replace one of them, but his injury was February 20th, so it’s not likely to be till December even on an optimistic timeline, by which time injury may have shaken things up. He’s pushing a much more aggressive timeline narrative and being back early November, but while he’s entitled to self-motivate, as Parsons just observed, the odds are poor that it’s real. Watson missed 9.6 months before being out there, for reference.
The only negative I see are fans griping that Wilson wasn’t good in GB. Well he was good enough that I want him back. Also that Wilson doesn’t dazzle in shorts. Go figure! I read that about any big back and immediately dismiss the commenter as a fool. It’s the jitterbug types who shine in shorts.
I’d love to have Wilson back, but that doesn’t mean I can buy into such wishful thinking or see any point in hanging on to that as a realistic possibility.
golfpacker61
June 05, 2026 at 06:19 pm
I am just reporting what I read CW. Multiple articles including on a Seahawks website. I was also a Wilson fan, he always came thru when we needed him at a minimum price. I don't have a clue if it's true, but they did sign Wilson before they drafted Price. If they were to release him later in the summer, I sure as hell hope GB has their RB issues worked out. I also would like to see Strong given a real chance to win the job.
dobber
June 05, 2026 at 10:11 am
"I would hate for Sweat to end up with the Bears, that alone might be enough reason to make the trade."
I've never been a fan of using limited resources to try to play keep away from other teams.
golfpacker61
June 05, 2026 at 06:35 pm
If GB didn't have the money that would be a thing Dobber, but they do. All I am saying is GB has a need at Edge rusher and trading for Sweat @ the right price would fill the need. And as I have said before if we didn't want him past 2026, he should be easy to move if he is still healthy, maybe for more than we gave for him. Add in no guaranteed money in 27 & 28 would make him more attractive to a team that needed him. I would really hate to see him end up in Chicago or Minnesota though.
I still favor just signing Clowney and get this need filled.
greengold
June 05, 2026 at 10:38 am
Sean Jones vibes. Cam Jordan is a rock solid option to both bolster the EDGE position while adding a legit veteran presence to a very young position group.
Jordan still brings it with 2025: 36 Pressures, 21 Hurries, 5 QB Hits, 10.5 sacks plus an elite run stop grade of 82.1 per PFF.
golfpacker61
June 05, 2026 at 06:27 pm
Agree GG, signing Jordan or Clowney for an insurance year just makes so much sense. It's not like they are some unproductive pass rushers at this point. What they both bring is veteran pass rushing leadership that doesn't need a ton of snaps to have real game changing production. The money is almost comical compared to what even average pass rushers are getting now. And neither Jordan or Clowney would stunt the growth of the young guys. I year to get us thru Parsons missing games to start the year and maybe leading us to a winning record in the first 4 games.