Why Jordan Morgan Could Define the 2026 Packers' Offense
By Carter Semb

Green Bay's offensive line was not good enough in 2025.
The Packers' offense goes as the offensive line goes — and more specifically, as Jordan Love goes. When the line keeps him clean, there's very little stopping Green Bay's offense. The numbers back that up. When kept clean last season, Love completed 77.8% of his passes for 2,863 yards and 26 touchdowns, throwing just two interceptions — good for a passer rating of 129.4. When facing pressure, that number dropped all the way to 49.2.
The drop-off wasn't due to a lack of investment. Three of the five starters were making over $17 million annually, and the group included a former first-round pick and a second-round pick competing for spots. Despite that, the Packers found themselves playing a never-ending game of musical chairs — injury after injury along the offensive front made it nearly impossible to build any continuity. Injuries played a part, but some players simply took a step back — namely, Rasheed Walker. Green Bay's left tackle allowed five sacks and 40 pressures last season, while racking up 11 penalties. It was the most pressure Walker has allowed in his NFL career and ranked among the worst marks in the league at the position. That kind of performance from the left tackle spot is simply not good enough for an offense that needs to keep their quarterback clean.
The Packers are banking on that position being better in 2026, and they're counting on addition by subtraction to get there. Walker, an unrestricted free agent, signed with the Carolina Panthers after his market didn't materialize the way many — including Walker himself — had expected. Rather than bringing him back at a discount, the Packers are rolling with someone already in the building — Jordan Morgan.
Turns out Jordan Morgan is a pretty good tackle.
Maybe playing guys at their actual position is a good idea 🤷♂️ pic.twitter.com/J7EywGUrIO
— Eli Berkovits (@BookOfEli_NFL) January 22, 2026
The Sample Size for Optimism
“Yeah, he’s ready.”
The decision to draft Jordan Morgan in the first round of the 2024 draft left some people scratching their heads. Morgan was an excellent athlete with over 2,000 snaps logged at left tackle in college, but there were questions about whether his skill set would translate to the NFL — some wondered if he'd ultimately have to slide inside to guard, despite never having played anywhere other than left tackle. The Packers also already had two serviceable tackles on the roster in Walker and Zach Tom, which created a bit of a logjam. A combination of that depth and some untimely injuries made it difficult for Morgan to get a real opportunity to show what he could do at the position he was used to playing.
Most of Morgan's first two seasons were spent everywhere except left tackle. As a rookie, he played exclusively at guard before an injury ended his season early. His sophomore year was more of the same — just spread even thinner. He logged 191 snaps at left guard, 358 at right guard, 219 at right tackle, and just 51 at left tackle. The Packers wanted him to be a Swiss Army knife, but asking a young offensive lineman to master every position before settling into one is a tough ask — and the results reflected that.
Now, the Packers are finally letting Morgan settle in at the position he knows best — left tackle. And the early returns, despite being limited, are encouraging. In two preseason games in 2025, Morgan played left tackle for 61 snaps and didn't allow a single pressure. PFF graded his pass blocking at 88.0 and 88.2 in those two games — both elite marks. He allowed just one pressure all preseason, and that came while playing left guard. It’s important to take all preseason performances with a grain of salt, but those numbers are hard to ignore.
Offensive coordinator Adam Stenavich noticed too. "Last year, Rasheed was out for a little while in preseason, so we moved Jordan to left tackle, and he did a great job," Stenavich said earlier this offseason. "He played in the preseason against some pretty good defensive linemen from the Colts, and I saw him play and I was like: 'Yeah, he's ready'." Morgan spent most of the 2025 regular season back at guard, and the results were mixed. That changed in Week 15 when Zach Tom went down, and Morgan moved back outside. Over the final four weeks of the season, he allowed just five total pressures and produced an average PFF grade of 70.1 — doing his part to keep Jordan Love clean. “I’m excited about him being over there,” Stenavich added. “I thought last year he showed flashes of being able to be a good left tackle in this league when we had him out there. I’m excited to get him out there, get him comfortable playing on the edge, protecting the blind side, and just have him own that position and be the best version of himself.”
On @WildeAndTausch, “true professional” @MarkTauscher65 asked @joethomas73 about his visit to Green Bay and what the @halloffamefarms beef magnate saw from the #Packers’ “beef” up front. 🥩
Here’s Joe’s view of new starting LT Jordan Morgan.
(@WISCTV_News3 story to follow.) pic.twitter.com/meQFEi2HNY
— Jason Wilde (@jasonjwilde) May 22, 2026
Expert Verification
Green Bay's offense showed flashes of brilliance in 2025, but inconsistency held it back — and the offensive line was largely to blame. The unit ranked 15th in total yards per game (332.6), 17th in passing yards per game (212.8), 15th in rushing yards per game (119.8), and 16th in scoring offense (23.0). There were bright spots — the offense ranked 4th in EPA/play (0.10) — but Jordan Love faced pressure on 38.6% of his dropbacks, the sixth-highest rate among qualified quarterbacks.
Personnel-wise, the offense will look nearly identical to last season — except at one critical position. Strong left tackle play could unlock the offense, which makes Jordan Morgan undoubtedly the biggest X-factor on Green Bay's offense in 2026. If Morgan settles in and keeps his quarterback upright, the sky is the limit for the offense. If he struggles, the unit could find itself sputtering once again. That's a lot of pressure to put on a young, relatively inexperienced player — but all signs point to Morgan being up to the challenge. Stenavich believes he's ready, but he's not the only one singing Morgan's praises. The Packers had an unexpected guest at OTAs earlier this offseason: Joe Thomas. If anyone knows what quality left tackle play looks like, it's the Hall of Famer. After watching Morgan in live action, he came away impressed. "He's a great athlete. He's got exceptional footwork. He's powerful."
What made it even more meaningful was the context. Thomas came to OTAs ready to offer feedback. "I was sitting there waiting to give him a bunch of tips about things I thought he could do a better job of," Thomas said. "We watched film that morning, and I said to him, 'Honestly, buddy, there are a couple of little things that I would do differently if it were me, but that's more specific to how I played — it's not like it's better or worse than what you're doing.' We talked about a few things in general, but overall, I really was impressed with how he moved, the fastidiousness with which he approached his craft." If a tackle of Thomas’ reputation leaves mostly impressed — that's about as good a review as Morgan could ask for.
Thomas, a Wisconsin native who spent his entire NFL career with the Cleveland Browns, had no obligation to compliment anyone in a Packers uniform, but he definitely did. "I thought that everything I saw on the field was just impressive — where he placed his hands, his footwork, his technique, his hand placement, just the focus that he was playing with, how quick he was moving, getting up to the second level on his combination blocks…I think that the offensive line is going to be one of their strengths this year."
There’s plenty of reason for optimism surrounding Jordan Morgan in 2026. It’s not going to be perfect, but all the tools and signs are there for him to help solidify a unit that plagued the Packers throughout 2025. Many think Morgan is ready, but now he has to go out and prove it. If he can do that, Green Bay's offense won't just be good — it'll be dangerous.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Carter Semb is a lifelong Packer fan, shareholder, and season ticket holder. He is a contributor for Cheesehead TV and Packers Talk. For commentary surrounding Wisconsin sports, he can be found on X at @cmsemb.
__________________________




Comments (27)
greengold
June 01, 2026 at 03:14 pm
I have always thought Jordan Morgan was a steal from his drat class. Historically exceptional PFF numbers at LT, his last 2 seasons at Arizona >80.0 grades in both pass and run blocking.
Never could understand Walker remaining starting LT, because he sucked at run blocking, and his pass blocking dropped significantly last season.
Morgan’s a natural at LT and an upgrade over Walker. Jager Burton, a healthy Zach Tom & Anthony Belton lend confidence in seeing this OL solidify into an effective unit. Still on the fence with Rhyan & Banks, but hopeful that they show improvement.
PhantomII
June 01, 2026 at 03:24 pm
Walker lost his LG in Jenkins and later his bad ass TE Kraft also...which would show how much both meant to him and our starting OL....last season...Hopefully now Morgan can solidify that bookend position and the rest of the OL can get and stay healthy. More worried about RT coming back from several injuries AGAIN...and him being knocked out of the playoffs every season....UUGG.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 01, 2026 at 10:53 pm
Walker just wasnt that good. In a contract year, he failed to elevate his play.
TKWorldWide
June 02, 2026 at 06:14 am
And yet they still chose to start 63 over 77. Head scratcher for sure!
sugarbair
June 02, 2026 at 10:29 am
That's exactly what I am thinking. If Walker was playing that poorly and Morgan was doing so well. Why the heck didn't they make the change.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 01, 2026 at 10:42 pm
Walker stayed at left tackle cuz he couldnt play anywhere else. Had they started Morgan at LT, Walker wouldve been the 6th man who could only play 1 spot whereas Morgan had some versatility to play elsewhere. They were banking on Walker balling out in a contract year like many players do but it wasnt to be. Now its Morgan's time to shine. I have Morgan and Belton as the Packers' two biggest breakout canidates who make this oline a strength of this team once again.
Coldworld
June 01, 2026 at 03:30 pm
Maybe he proves to be a stellar pick delayed in blossoming only by playing and practicing out of position. He looks to me a better bet to hold up this year than Bakh did going into his rookie season or even Tom, who they played Newman over at RT as a rookie.
However, suppose he does fail. Then move Tom over to left T, his position for his final two college seasons (before that he was an C) and see if Glover or one of the others emerges as a viable RT. Maybe have Brant Banks work at RT. That was his primary college position, not LT. (We’ve about 8 former college LTs on the 91, of which Banks ironically is isn’t one).
There are other ways to succeed even here, if we approach positional preparation wisely. Morgan might be the best bet, but we have the capability to develop others from a roster perspective. One can only hope our coaches can see it and design practice strategically this year.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 01, 2026 at 10:50 pm
Royce Newman was never a preferred starter at RT. I think you're confusing him for Yosh Nijman, who started 13 games at RT in 2022. Newman only started 1 game at RT when Nijman was hurt. Zack Tom actually started 3 games at left tackle and 2 games at left guard that year. Elgton Jenkins also started the season at RT before switching back to LG.
golfpacker61
June 01, 2026 at 04:29 pm
The majority of our O-linemen were Left Tackles in college with a wealth of experience. Morgan better be good this year as we will have major competition in the NFC. The Rams just raised the bar even higher by trading for Myles Garrett. How in the world can they have the cap space for Garrett after dropping a kings ransom on CBs this year? And giving Stafford a new contract for $55 million. There is only so much cap room to play with.
GregC
June 01, 2026 at 04:37 pm
I don't know how they did it. I did not hear any speculation about the Rams being able to pull off a deal like this.
Coldworld
June 01, 2026 at 04:41 pm
Garrett is on a heavily back end weighted deal . His hit this year is under 10 million. The likelihood is it’s a 2 year deal with effectively a team option on the third. They don’t have a lot of dead cap hanging around from departed players because they don’t structure contracts like we do with big initial bonuses that bite on departure but pay it forward at the beginning.
Bitternotsour
June 01, 2026 at 06:12 pm
They traded a guy they couldn't afford and would have lost next year.
The_Baloney_Stops_Here
June 01, 2026 at 10:51 pm
Because Garrett has a surprisingly affordable cap number for 2026, 2027, and 2028.
PhantomII
June 02, 2026 at 05:35 am
The Super Bowl this year is at SOFI...All in play from the Rams to host their own local SB...along with World Cup and Olympics...money everywhere...but it really only has to work 1 season to them.
Tundraboy
June 02, 2026 at 07:25 pm
Must be using the Dodgers approach!?
Alberta_Packer
June 01, 2026 at 11:18 pm
I think that Gutekunst was perplexed that Morgan did not play more at LT last year. Not only did it fragment his overall performance. But it also further exposed Walker's flaws at LT - which no doubt decreased his compensatory value. So not a great bit of O-line roster management.
TKWorldWide
June 02, 2026 at 06:17 am
Disappointing that 77 was unable (or the coaches were unwilling) to supplant 63. This season is HUGE, as there seems to be no desirable Plan B if Morgan flops.
golfpacker61
June 02, 2026 at 08:29 am
I was watching ESPN and their coverage of the Rams trade for Garrett. It looks like they have traded 7-8 of their last 10 1st round picks, and they have still been very successful. They are the epitome of "going all in." And they are very successful doing it their way. And like in our trade for Parsons, those picks always come late in the first round, so not picking from the creme of the crop. And no commitment to 1st round $$$ for the player.
This was a great trade for GB and a scary great trade for the Rams.
HarryHodag
June 02, 2026 at 08:51 am
My only question about Morgan is he went head-to-head with Walker last pre-season and didn't beat him out. Given the contract Walker signed in the offseason, a small contract for a starting left tackle, it makes me wonder about Morgan. If Morgan couldn't beat out Walker given Walker's apparent status across the league, then how good is Morgan?
We will see. I hope he steps up to fulfill his draft position.
Handsback
June 02, 2026 at 09:35 am
Alberta_Packer stated a very obvious point, in that Gutsey may have been perplexed on why Morgan wasn't playing more at LT. It ties into an article from Packernet about Lombardi. The article states that one of the reasons for his success was how he ran the team practices and prepared them for games. The players ran the plays until they could do it in their sleep. Repetitive snaps made them use the same technique in the 4th qtr when they were tired. It was a cornerstone to their success according to the article. I believe it probably was a huge reason for 5 championships in 7 years.
That runs contrary to the pursuit of stressing cross-training esp. in the days of fewer practices. I'm really beginning to think that the Packer's lack of success in playoffs is due to lack of focus to Lombardi's discipline to perfection during practices.
JMHO
Since'61
June 02, 2026 at 10:12 am
Handsback you are correct about the practice until perfect approach used by coach Lombardi. However the CBA prevents that much practice in the current era. The cross training is also a contributing factor but given the rate of injuries, especially for the Packers, it is somewhat of a necessity given the 17 game season plus the playoffs if they get that far. Having said that I would prefer if the Packers enabled their OLs to solidly learn their best position first before throwing them into the cross training. Thanks, Since '61
Zapato
June 02, 2026 at 10:07 am
Personally, I think the Packers wasted the first two years of Morgan's career by trying to diversify him into several different positions instead of focusing on left tackle (if LT was their long term plan for him). I mean how many teams are going to move their starting left tackle to fill another position on the line in the middle of the season? You play your best left tackle at that position exclusively all the time!
Leatherhead
June 02, 2026 at 12:20 pm
Let's remember a few things. Yes, we spent money on quality veterans on the offensive line. That's the only way you're going to have a quality, veteran line.
But Banks was hurt in training camp and didn't get going until the 3rd game, and missed a lot of practice. Jenkins was gone after midseason, and Tom missed 5 games, including the playoffs. So for all the money we spent, it wasn't on the field together very often.
Walker, Morgan, Rhyan.....and Banks were the four main pieces to our Oline, Then we added Belton.
I was re-watching the Denver game recently, because it was a late season game, on the road, against a quality opponent. Tom got hurt, and Kinnard came in. The right side of our line at that point had Rhyan with about 4 starts at Center, Belton with about 4 starts at RG, and Kinnard at RT. Over, and over again, on big plays, the right side of the line just got beat. Belton was a good player with Tom and Rhyan on either side of him, but replace Tom with Kinnard and now he's not as good anymore.
I really hoped we'd do more on strengthening the depth of the Oline this offseason. I hope it doesn't blow up in our face and then circle around and bite us in the ass.
Bitternotsour
June 02, 2026 at 12:53 pm
you can't do everything at once, hence a 5-year plan. Lot's of picks next year, we might have to suffer a bit this. The Packers aren't a nation state with unlimited resources. For the moment I'd like a better understanding of how the running back position is going to function with a player who is sure to be suspended.
Leatherhead
June 02, 2026 at 03:20 pm
However we replace Jacobs' snaps, they'll do better with better blocking.
If we assume that Brooks can replace Wilson's touches (140) then it's "only" Jacobs 270 touches. And that's if he misses the whole season. If he played even 135 touches in half a season, that still leaves 135 touches.
Kraft should get more touches than he did in a half a season. Williams should get more than 2 touches a game. Beyond that, the Packers need SOMEBODY from that group of Lloyd/Strong/Martinez/Nixon to help fill the hole.
270 touches. That's a big hole. We're going to miss what he brings. I detailed earlier that the Packers change up their backfield every other year, and it's probably time for another change. Trade for a proven back.
Bitternotsour
June 02, 2026 at 07:54 pm
As you say, there are questions. I'm a fan of winging it more, we have a top QB, let's call plays like we understand that. As always, I'm certain there will be a full 53-man lineup, that all the position groups will be staffed up.
Beyond that, it's a glorious mystery.
CheeseEdWest2
June 02, 2026 at 07:39 pm
This is just one example of Packer traits that we often complain about...but with no comparison to the best teams, what does all our howling mean? So, how does this practice of training for versatility on the OL compare to say Philly, SF, Buffalo, Seattle...does everybody do it our way, or is GB an outlier?