Eagles 10 Packers 7 Game Balls & Lame Calls

The Packers fall to the defending champs in a defensive slug fest, leaving us to wonder whether this is a turning point. 

On Monday, November 10th, there was a sporting event at Lambeau Field in Green Bay, Wisconsin. History will remember that this game was played. The Eagles will remember that this game was played. The Packers' defense will remember this game. 

The offense? I'm not convinced they were ever in the stadium.

Has anyone checked if there is a doppelganger situation happening? Perhaps the MonStars have drained the offense of their skill, in anticipation of a new Space Jam movie? Is it possible this Packers offense was too powerful, and that time travelers from the future had to come back to hamstring the offense, and prevent the Packers from making the game of football too boring?

As far as explanations go, well, that might be about all I got. 

There just isn't much to explain what exactly happened on Monday night. The Packers defense allowed just ten points to the defending Super Bowl champions, putting together a complete game on all levels of the field to suffocate the Eagles. What more could have been expected of them?

Game Balls 

Evan Williams

Williams has really grown into his own this season, and I don't think it's hyperbolic to say that he might be the best safety on the team right now. That isn't to say that Xavier McKinney is even playing badly! He's not! But Willliams is just everywhere. He's making plays in the run game, he's covering downfield, he's breaking up passes, and creating havoc all over the field. I'm even willing to forgive the touchdown given up on a great play by Devonta Smith. As I said, it's impossible to expect the defense to hold an opposing team to less than ten points, and I don't really care that it was Williams who that pass was targeting. He gets Game Ball #1. 

Josh Jacobs

For an offense that has failed to show up for multiple weeks now, Jacobs continues to prove that he is the best thing happening on that side of the ball. 74 yards rushing, the lone touchdown, and 33 yards receiving. Jacobs turned nothing into something multiple times over the course of the game, and is really starting to remind us of the 2024 version of himself, when he was the heart and soul of the Packers' offense. 

Lame Calls

The Offensive Line

In order for a performance like this to happen, there has to be culprits. To me, the offensive line is public enemy #1. 

It's been this way all season, and it's now clear that the strategy the front office had to reinforce the line has been an abject failure. In their journey to put together an offensive line that is competitive, they have instead found themselves with a line that is quite offensive. 

Maybe that's a bit harsh. After all, the line is hamstrung by injuries (more on that later), but it's clear that Jordan no longer feels comfortable in the pocket. How many times did we see open wide receivers over the middle of the field that Love just couldn't get too, because the walls were closing in around him behind the line of scrimmage? Meanwhile, the running game is also suffering. 3.8 yards per carry, with the longest run of the night coming off a Jordan Love scramble. There's just no reason to respect the Packers' run game, when you can stop it while still playing two high safeties. This leads to third and longs, which the Packers had success with early in the season, but now the line just can't protect Love long enough. The Packers started this game zero for five on third down, and finished five for thirteen. 

The Disconnect Between Matt LaFleur and Jordan Love

Look, I'm not psychic. I don't have a telepathic ability to get inside the heads of Jordan Love and Matt LaFleur. What I do have is two eyes, critical thinking, and the ability to sort out that, for some reason, MLF seems to not trust Jordan to be the engine of this offense. For a QB that was just awarded the richest contract in NFL history a season ago, the Packers sure do love to not let him sling it. 

There's a particular sequence that stands out in my mind. The second quarter, around the 11 minute mark. Jacobs had just rattled off a five yard run and an eleven yard run. First down: 3 yard run. Second down: -1 yard run. Third down: six yard pass. With fourth and two at your own 46, the Packers trot out to try to draw the Eagles offside, take the delay of game, and punt.

Starting off a drive with four straight runs. You finally let Love pass the ball, but you don't let him try to get two more yards. Instead, you do the thing that never works, and have to punt anyway. 

That's a very small example, and not the most egregious example of what I'm talking about. Over and over, the passing attack through Love has proven itself more effective than what the rushing attack is doing, even with Josh Jacobs' play over the last couple of weeks. It's mind boggling that Love is not being asked to do more in this offense. Did Love play a good game? No, and it's okay to admit that. Just as it's okay to admit that he's also not being put into a good enough position. 

Brandon McManus & The Curious Case of the Missing Kicking Competition

I don't trust what the Packers have been telling us about this kicking operation. Rewind to last week. We are told by LaFleur that there is no competition at kicker, and Brandon McManus would be starting. After the loss to the Panthers last week, LaFleur seemed to indicate that there would be some sort of open competition at kicker, early in the week. Then, three days ago, special teams coordinator Rich Bisaccia declared that McManus would kick on Monday, and MLF backtracked, even going so far as to say "you read to much into my comment". The Packers have insisted, over and over, that McManus was, first and foremost, healthy enough to kick. 

So why, oh why, did McManus himself indicate differently?

On Monday night's broadcast, the crew claimed McManus said that this week was the first time he had been "semi-healthy" since his quad injury weeks ago, just moments before he was trotted out for a 64 yard attempt. 

Not only did McManus miss the game tying field goal (admittedly a monumental task at 64 yards), but the Packers clearly did not trust him from shorter distances either, attempting a couple of long 4th down attempts rather than long 50+ field goal attempts.

Three and Out

-- Today's Phrase of the Game: "Disappointing, but not surprising". Today's effort by the offense was a heartbreaking affair, but can anyone really say they didn't see it coming? After all, we've seen this movie a couple of times this season. The Offensive line was overwhelmed, the run game ineffective, Jordan was jumpy in the pocket and made inaccurate throws because of it. And all the while, the coaching staff is unable to figure out a way to elevate the roster above these problems. No, it wasn't the first time we've seen this version of the Packers, and although I hope it will be the last, my gut says it isn't.

-- For a team who is catastrophically banged up at wide receiver and offensive line, the Packers sure couldn't afford to lose who they lost today. Romeo Doubs left the game with a chest injury, and we'll be eagerly waiting for more clarification regarding his status for next week. 

Even more noteworthy, however, is the loss of Elgton Jenkins. If the rumors are true, and Jenkins has a lower leg fracture, it's possible he could miss the rest of the season. There's a best case scenario where he might be able to return for the playoffs, but losing Jenkins along an offensive line that was already injured and performing below expectations might be devastating. Sean Rhyan did not seem lost as a replacement, and his play over the next weeks at center could be a trial period for the team, should Jenkins turn into a cap cut this offseason. 

-- The Packers are on the road next week, and will take on the Brian Daboll-less New York Giants. It's possible the Giants could also be without their rookie QB Jaxson Dart, who left Sunday's game with an apparent nasty concussion. If he is forced to miss next Sunday's matchup with Green Bay, interim coach Mike Kafka will make his debut with Russel Wilson at QB, who was anemic at best when he began the season as New York's QB. The Giants bring a nasty pass rush to the table, and Green Bay should not look past this game, even with divisional games against Minnesota and Detroit looming on the horizon. 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Co-Owner of the thirteen time world champion Green Bay Packers. Sometimes I write about them. Follow me on Twitter at https://x.com/kjones_in_co and on Substack for film breakdowns!

__________________________

 

0 points
 

Comments (120)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:10 am

"Sean Rhyan did not seem lost as a replacement, and his play over the next weeks at center could be a trial period for the team, should Jenkins turn into a cap cut this offseason."

What's the difference? Bad to worse? Couldn't tell. If nothing else leave Rhyan at center and move Jenkins back to guard and give that a try. TRY SOMETHING!

I don't think it was so much Love being skittish and not seeing or missing open receivers as it was having to throw through and or around arms in his face. This might also be why they can't trust Love to do more, because it's impossible. They struggled to find anything consistent because nothing was being blocked consistently.

0 points
0
0
packerbackerjim's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:23 am

I put this loss squarely on Love. He WILL NOT throw the balls away. Last night he took sacks and a strip fumble leaving at least 6 points somewhere other than the scoreboard. Not seeing wide open receivers didn’t help.Willis should have replaced Love. I believe had this happened in the 60’s Coach Lombardi would have had Zeke play the second half. Bart’s ego may have been bruised but no long-term effects remained.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:32 am

From what I saw, I thought Rhyan played well at OC. We will get a good look at him there, but I thought when he played OC he was opening up some holes in the run game.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:16 pm

I agree RPC Rhyan looked fine at center, as apposed to an unmotivated X-pro bowl player Jenkins ...

0 points
0
0
MainePackFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:08 pm

Jenkins belongs at guard. He's not a center and he's not a tackle. It's been proven time and time again.

0 points
0
0
MainePackFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:24 pm

Love was definitely skittish. He's not playing with confidence because he doesn't trust the o-line, he doesn't trust the receivers, and he doesn't trust himself right now.

That being said, can someone explain to me what Watson was doing playing defensive back on a pass he had a chance to catch. This team is in disarray, and Lafleur has no answers. That's a problem. It's starting to smell like the end of the McCarthy years accept this team is much younger. Time will tell.

0 points
0
0
KenEllis's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:12 am

Lame Call = Me for thinking this was a Super Bowl caliber roster after we traded 2 1st round picks for Parsons.

Shame on me for thinking this offensive line was any good and that MLF is the type of coach to lead the Packers to a Super Bowl.

I won’t be fooled again, but more importantly does Ed Policy recognize just how dire the situation is both now and heading into 2026?

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:21 am

I dunno man. The plan WAS (left to right); Walker (or Morgan if he beat him out in camp) Banks-Jenkins-Rhyan (Morgan-ditto)-Tom. Bigger, more physical to keep the running and play-action going.

Sounded decent, but virtually nothing/nobody has been a pleasant surprise. Argh.
If there are any fans left that still don’t understand the value of trenches on both sides of the ball, may there be mercy on your soul.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:48 am

Been concerned for weeks the OL was, is, and remains a torpedo that will blow up the Packers post season chances.

Hafley looked as his trench after one season and make a coaching change. LaFleur looks at his trench and tells himself it is a cohesive, well oiled machine led by great coaches. It is the best coaching talent he can summon, apparently.

Since 1996, the Packers finally have a dominant defense. In the 3 losses the D did the job well enough to win them all.

Amazing how uncomplimentary LaFleurs teams have been for 6 1/2 years. He seems unable to assemble a great, overall team. And now, I don't even see him as a very good OC. He seems timid and fearful of change. Status quo is his safety blanket and the Football Committee seems cool with it.

Is Ed going to change any "policies" for the football operation?

0 points
0
0
Rhah's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:24 pm

Banks was/is a bad player,he has not lived up to his contract.

0 points
0
0
Tex49's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:27 am

Aside from the cowboys game this defense gives up 16 points a game. The D is more than enough Parsons was worth it. The offense as currently constructed should be good enough to score 17 points a game. I don’t think it’s the players the coach is coaching scared.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:42 pm

It's a Super Bowl caliber defense, and Parsons helped. Basically every player on that defense is under contract for next season.

The offensive line? 3 sacks, at least one,and IMO two,of which were caused by Love, including the fumble. A better rushing average. This is no worse than an average offensive line, all things considered.

Look, two big plays. Barcley jukes a defender and takes it for 40 yards. Smith catches a well covered 36 yard TD pass. Those two plays account for 76 of the 183 yards of passing yards they had, and set up or scored all 10 of their points.

MY POINT is "where are our two big plays?" Who made the big plays for us on offense? We had ONE play over 20 yards. One more big play would have meant the difference yesterday.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:16 am

What can GB do to upgrade the O-line? My guesses: right now dang near nothing. Off-season: let Banks go (rumor has it his contract structure doesn’t make for enormous dead money, but I could be wrong.)
Is letting Rasheed leave for big money on the FA market still a foregone conclusion? And lesser so for Rhyan?
Is Morgan any good?
Can Belton play tackle, or is he just a jumbo guard?
With no pick in rd 1, is an offensive lineman a given in round two? I know GB has had success at picking linemen later. A corner would also be nice. Or of course BPA if a guy is just too good to pass up.
The work is certainly cut out.
GPG!

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:23 am

I think the more important question is who will be making this picks. Assuming LaFleur is gone after a one & done or worse.. is Gutekunst gone too?

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:29 am

I get that. But a great offensive line makes any playcaller instantly smarter.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:58 am

"(rumor has it his contract structure doesn’t make for enormous dead money, but I could be wrong.)"

According to Over the Cap Banks would net a $4.6M cap savings with a pre June 1st cut in 2026.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:41 am

That’ll work.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:10 am

I'm expecting we'll see--with the limited picks the Packers have at their disposal--multiple OL and CB selections next spring. Luckily, IOL and CBs are often found throughout the draft. I can't predict what the Packers are going to do with Walker. Supposedly they had some preliminary contract talks.

They can't shitcan the whole group (aside from Tom)...so who do you keep, who do you pay, and who walks?

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:44 am

Or move Tom to LT and let Belton play on the right. Unless Morgan or whatever. Not likely to find a LT after round one. (I know Bakh and Tom were 4’s and Walker a 7th, but…?)

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:02 am

I agree in that I don't know that Tom ISN'T the LT of the future, and they need to be looking at the personnel they have and figure who can play and who is just taking up space. Morgan played well at LT in camp and I think we've all presumed him to be the LT of the future, but that may not be the case.

Somehow I think people around here would be placated to see Morgan at LT due to his draft status and Tom at C due to pre-draft scout comments, even if it isn't the best alignment the Packers can bring forward.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:46 am

Yep, agreed. They’ve got options, and they need them!

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:14 pm

Moving Tom to LT seems plausible, but only if we’ve got a better RT option than left aside from him. I do not think C is likely now outside of an emergency. He has simply proved too good as a T for too long and genuinely good Ts are harder to find.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:02 pm

Yeah I’m just going with the notion that your best tackle plays on the left side.

0 points
0
0
Rhah's picture

November 11, 2025 at 02:48 pm

I would cut Banks fast and move Jenkins back to LG. Resign Rhyan for C. Belton LT next year? That's the big question mark.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:10 pm

Sadly, I doubt Jenkins plays another snap as a Packer. His cost is steep and it’s at least plausible his problems are just injuries catching up with him. Now he’s out for the season most likely.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:05 pm

Rhah, Jenkins is no longer a pro bowl left guard ... that train left town years ago.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:01 pm

Rasheed leave for big money? TKW there are a thousand unemployed comedians out there and your still trying to be one? :)

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:03 pm

Ha!
I mean more than GB wants to pay, and it sure seems like they want Morgan to take the LT spot. But has he earned that confidence?

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:17 am

Rock solid summary, Kalani.

Brandon McManus is now a liability. K Lukas Havrisik is remarkably still on GB's roster. He should be getting every opportunity moving forward.

What on earth did Brian Gutekunst NOT see with teams being able to run on the Packers iDL these last - what - 6 years... 7 years? This Packers D needs RUN STUFFERS in the middle. Last time the Packers won a SB, they had taken BJ Raji the year prior, and Ted Thompson signed Howard Green. You have to have 2 of those "big fellas," in the middle. Kenny Clark's best seasons were at NT. Joe Barry had him lose weight to play 3T... and, poof!

Wyatt is a true 3T, who can play the 1T, 2T... but, he's one guy. What in the Wide World of Sports is going on here?

A quality boundary CB who can compete with top NFL WR talent opposite Valentine? Nixon does all he can, but... c'mon! He doesn't have the size/speed/techniques to be an outside CB. Get Kamal Hadden in there and get him up to speed. Players can't develop if they don't play.

This Packers team still has a ton of talent, but, it's being wasted because of poor decisions in talent acquisition/$$$ contract extensions with no ROI. Hobbs. McManus. Banks. Mistakes getting all the reps, compounding the mistakes. Wow. The Packer fans themselves can see this a mile away.

How does the Packers GM not see this, not take action..? No trades. No help. No bueno.

Getting "over the hump" is a thing.

Lastly, Matt LaFleur? This is your best? You looked like a kid who didn't have his report ready to turn in on the due date... scrambling.

***Hey Matt, try using a 6th OL.*** Seriously, wtf?

UGH.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:00 am

To be fair this loss isn't on the D. Heck in all of their losses the D has held the opposition to 16 points or less.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:06 am

You clicked just before me. Would have saved me a post.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:58 am

I do agree, the Packers D played well. 100%, and there's no way this loss can be hung on the D. I was just taking into consideration PHI did have success running the football for 111 yds on us, and couldn't get the stink off of what CAR had done the week prior, etc. etc. Shipley had 4 carries, straight up the gut, with a 4.3 yd. average, helping PHI to 43.8% success on 3rd down. Meanwhile, the Packers O only converted 38% on 3rd down.

This loss was on our O and STs. 10 passing 1Ds. 7 rushing 1Ds. All we had was 7 points to show for that? Once again, another missed FG involving poor decision making... Penalties on both of those units contributed to scoring opportunities lost.

Coaching on O and ST showing to be a recurring problem.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:11 am

Point taken.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:46 am

"I was just taking into consideration PHI did have success running the football for 111 yds on us"

If you told me at 7 pm last night that the Packers would hold Barkley and Hurts to under 111 yards rushing and the Eagles to under 300 yards of total offense, I would've guessed they won.

"Coaching on O and ST showing to be a recurring problem."

If Melton would've had the awareness to NOT cross the goal line on that late punt and hold the Eagles to 1st down on the 6-inch-line, the game may have turned dramatically. The ensuing possession starting at the 20 turned into the Eagles' lone TD drive of the night. I'm not saying that play was the turning point in the game...maybe it was? But it seems that winning teams make those plays.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:30 pm

How would you suggest Melton pull it back without being that deep? He was an inch onto the line and barely got it back into play without hitting the deck and getting the touchback that way. A lot to criticize, but that seems incredibly harsh.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 12, 2025 at 08:55 am

All I'm saying is that the really great teams seem to get those kinds of plays when they need them, and that putting Philly on the 1--which handcuffs what they call on that next drive--rather than on the 20 (noting that 5 plays later they were in the end zone), might have made a real impact in the outcome of the game.

"A lot to criticize, but that seems incredibly harsh."

We all keep coming back to the little things. The things that the Packers just don't seem to be doing consistently enough that turn a 3-point loss into a win. Melton ran 10 yards laterally along the goal line to get to that ball. He knows the rule. He knows he's gotta be in play. We all seem to be demanding perfection--well, being imperfect can be pretty harsh.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:05 am

In the 3 loses the Packers D gave up an average of 13 points. You make good points greengold, but you're calling out the D? They actually had the worst time against Dallas, but that was when the Packers had some offense.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:07 am

I didn't call out the D specifically, but rather Brian Gutekunst. We had no answer for DeVonta Smith? No? 4 rec for over 17 yd avg?

There are multiple issues on this team that I called out. CB remains an issue, no? I mean, Valentine played great - looks the part, and Nixon appears miscast. No?

Am I wrong about the Packers not having substantial beef at iDL? It's been an unaddressed issue for years. NT. Has it not? Think having 2 quality, true NTs working in rotation wouldn't have changed the outcome?

We've had ST issues for years PRIOR to Rich Bisaccia. And, ...

Aaron Banks? Really? Brian McManus, INJURED, alluded prior to the game his quad had not healed... and whose decision was that? Bisaccia or LaFleur? Gutekunst?

There's issues all over. Yes, our D kept us in the game. O, STs and LaFleur/Bisaccia, not so much. Throw Gutekunst into that mix too.

Who exactly was making the calls on Hobbs, and injured McManus and Banks playing?

I'd rather have Hafley be our HC.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:12 am

Like I said, you make good points. Too bad those are the least of our problems.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:16 am

Man, SCORING is our #1 problem. Did I not call out Matt LaFleur? Scoring was our #1 problem LAST YEAR! I've said it many times, Steve.

LaFleur's responsible for getting the players ready to play an NFL game. Our O, outside of Jacobs and Doubs looked abysmal.

Laugh it up. All I know is the #6 Giants, #17 Lions and #23 Vikings are running the football at a better clip than are the #24 Packers. We can have another conversation later on this.

Oh, btw, CHI is ranked #5 in Rushing O in the NFL by PFF... and, we play them Dec. 7th and Dec 20th. Heads-up!

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:26 am

That will always be the case when you're playing 7 on 11. Never ending theme lately.

I think they had it so good for so long they thought O-lineman grew on trees and they could pluck them from anywhere in the draft or practice squads. Then they can coach them up to play anywhere on the line against NFL D-linemen.

0 points
0
0
bassrock's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:08 am

You weren't howling about McManus when they signed him and after his play last year. He was playing to that level until the injury. Are the Packers actually the problem by playing him when still not 100% with a kicker that looked the part for the games he played? Same as last year not playing Willis for another game or so when Love was still hobbled.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:17 pm

Gute has provided an option. It’s the coaching staff that has repeatedly now declined to take it.

0 points
0
0
Rhah's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:27 pm

You are complaining about the Defense?

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:18 am

I think your just making to many assumptions
between MLF and Jordan Love.

The problem is the OL.
It has always been the OL.

With Jenkins hurt now.( As predicted)
I felt the packers found their
center.

But the real question is
why they're not moving Morgan.

Gute made a mistake signing Banks.
The chemistry just isn't there.

MLF must change his OL, regardless
of Gute's interference.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:36 am

A septuagenarian and an octogenarian kicked his ass @ home in the 2021 NFCCH game, running Tampa's offense. Why play Morgan as a guard?
Personnel up front is on Gute. You have to mine gold when it is staring you in the face. Myers vs Humphrey
just snowballs down the line. LaFleur turns away from repeating successful play calls, trying to play the Magical Mystery Tour with the Game Plan. Too many drops, but Love was hearing footsteps and he wants to stay out of the Infirmary. No help from the Gameplan. If you want to play smash mouth, you need a Fullback. When Philly gave them a gift on the 4th down shot to the endzone, they had a chance, but not much time. Watson was open for the Game winner/tie with FG. Love didn't deliver the ball accurately. Now you know why I wanted them to move UP for Q. Mitchell. He was the top dog to target. Williams can compete as well as DeJean. Bullard is still a challenge vs the other guys passed over like Bullock and Kam Kinchens. He's no Branch.

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:19 am

The names change but the results don’t.
Half a season left, turn off the volume and silently watch the results.
If they (miraculously) start winning and win at LEAST two playoff games, then rewind and enter 2026.
If it continues to look like 2024, then I would assume LaFleur AND Gutekunst are gone.
When you look back at the entirety of the Matt LaFleur era, one word you never use is consistency (except for being among league leaders in penalties).
He’s just not the guy. I think we all knew it after the 2024 season.
Getting Parsons, and drafting a WR @#1 didn’t make LaFleur a better coach. It’s not happening for him in Green Bay.

0 points
0
0
Guam's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:01 am

I agree - I think the clock is ticking for LaFleur. His teams too often beat themselves. Untimely penalties that wash out big gains; playing calling so obvious that the opponent knows what is coming; waiting till halftime to make adjustments (if that happens at all); and all too often, bad choices for coaching staff.

The bloom is off the rose. Make Hafley the head coach. Now!

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:18 am

He (Hafley) may not be the guy as a HC in the NFL. I don’t know. Ideally find a HC that would want to retain Hafley.
Bottom line is, this team is in trouble.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:03 am

Hafley was viewed as a HC candidate last season...and if his Defense continues to play well, he will likely be a HC next season.

My question is will the gig be in Green Bay?

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:13 am

Get a guy who has been on a Superbowl winning squad and bring some fresh ideas to the table.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:55 am

Agree...been saying it for a few years and getting laughed at...you laughers will soon be saying bye bye to MLF..

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:21 am

As I was watching the game last night all I could think of is MLF is no longer what is best for this franchise. Another thought has been creeping into my mind as well, that thought about Gute.

Gutes picks, especially on offense just aren't cutting it. To make matters worse he gave a larger contract to Nate Hobbs who has been dismal at best. The other FA contract was to Aaron Banks who if he isn't injured, can't seem to get it together and commit a STUPID penalty at the worse time.

Yes, Kraft, Reed, and Golden were injured. Sorry but Doubs and Wicks is NOT a recipe for success against NFL defenses let alone the SB Champs. I feel for Jordan love. That first fumble was yet another boneheaded play but we could see what he was at least trying to do. But MLF has hamstrung this offense with his play calling.

I'm actually CONCERNED about the upcoming game vs the Giants. This season will go one of two ways this upcoming Sunday. Either the Packers and MLF take their heads out of their asses and win...BIG. Or this season may just spiral out of control on a downward spiral with yet another loss.

I'm actually leaning towards the spiral because of MLF. The dude is lost and looks it on the sidelines.

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:34 am

Agreed. It really feels like the wheels are coming off. The D gives up 26 points in 2 home games and gets an L for each. The HC is lying about player health (says McManus is ok, player says to press he isn't) and as an offensive guru he almost put up a goose egg. Got to wonder what the practices will be like this week.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:44 am

NP, with due respect. Is it really MLF, or JLove? I have lost faith in MLF, but those two are married...so to speak. To MLF's credit....and that isn't enough to have faith in him, is that JLove has too many limitations and is too often missing open receivers even when they get open. And of course the Oline isn't giving him much time....but that is life in the NFL for majority of teams. And of course the WR corps is mediocre (or so the evidence seems). Doubs is the only reliable one getting open. So MLF has to scheme around the limitations of JLove; rely on TE and RB for 60% of pass attack, and/or rely on Jacobs to loosen up the pass rush...so JLove has more time. The opposing defensive coordinators know that...and they give Jacobs his modest chunks....and keep pressing JLove....into mistakes and checkdowns. So is it all MLF? Yes, well...no, well yes. In the end, he's responsible to work with what he has. Well...no...because he has a limited captain.

0 points
0
0
SinceLombardi's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:28 am

It’s year seven. It IS MLF. It wasn’t Rodgers, and it isn’t Love. It’s the architect of this offense.
Few teams have dominant O lines. The best coaches make it work.
Granted Love will NEVER be Rodgers, but he can probably be a force with a better play caller. Hell Trent Dilfer won a SB, and Rich Gannon made it to one. Love has to be as least of that caliber for $55 million a year.
And Love was MLF & Guty’s pick. MLF just can’t develop him (at least to his potential)
Two home games in a row this team was sleep walking for the first 50 minutes.
Over the six and a half years we have had two things:
Promise
Disappointment
MLF is the common denominator.

0 points
0
0
FumundaStank's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:49 am

So, realistically, what is it going to take to get rid of MLF and Gute? If they end up losing out, which is a real possibility, would that be enough for Policy to say it's time for a change. Or are they going to use injuries as an excuse for the poor showing on the field and continue with the status quo. This team is looking a lot like the end of the McCarthy era. It's become pretty clear to me that MLF and Gute will never get this team to the Super Bowl.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:51 am

Gute's picks -
Well that is the obvious.
Banks replaced a All- pro LG.
TT would not have done that.
He would have let them walked and
drafted the future.
Gute drafted his future in Morgan.
A OT to replace Walker?
Only to be a RG.?
The position everyone knew was the problem.
MLF has a problem.
The problem is Gute not listening to him.
And a OL and WRs who can't play
clutch football.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:05 am

ProBowl guard, not ALL-PRO and his mobility suffered after his ACL tear. I am biased, but the deal was to bag
Broderick Jones to cover the left flank in lieu of Van Ness who was over-drafted. The following year if they really wanted a guard draft Barton. The DTs selected to fill the depth chart ain't cutting it. Wyatt is definitely coming on and you can build around him. Karl brings some attitude and his inside game is improving . I like Sorrell, he attacks. The choice of Oliver and Savion W. when they needed CB and DT in that Three-Four spot may define this draft. I don't hear right this ship talk coming from the podium. I hear a repetitive script of it's on me etc etc.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:47 pm

Gute's biggest problem; is nobody will rebound in his eyes.
Wr - Golden worked per pick #.
But remember how I wanted Jihad.
And would he have traded for Parsons?
The eagles keep taking my guys.
And they love them.
Winner eagles-

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:21 pm

Jihad had no spot to fill unless they moved Quay in a trade. Cooper is better. Get Hopper on the field instead of watching McDuffie being bent backwards. Why you need bigger LBs off the bench to fill as pluggers on the run set. Q. Mitchell was the prize when he fell--move up. Nolan Smith showed up for Philly, but he is usually banged up. The defense played spectacularly, they are set. Keep Melton the hell away from the offensive side of the ball. He wanted to play smash mouth then get Heath into the game plan. Wicks is a guy I don't bring onboard. Not a clutch guy with the key drops. Maybe bring Holmgren in for a "pep talk." This game was on a disjointed offense w.out a plan.

0 points
0
0
Blizzard's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:15 am

This is too reminiscent of the final days of MM. Same old boring mindless coach speak at the end of games, Boring predictable offense, no adjustments during the game, poor clock management, poor game management, terrible roster management. Is MLF really MM in disguise?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:54 am

"This is too reminiscent of the final days of MM."

Not hardly.

0 points
0
0
BritPack's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:54 pm

Don't worry people, MLF is an offensive mastermind. Everything's going to be just fine, honest.🤣🤣

0 points
0
0
jlc1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:23 am

Turns out the other team knows what play you're going to call. Might be time to change things up.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:18 am

Didn't you know what play they're going to run? Remember us complaining about this towards the end of Rodgers' time? You could guess the play with at least 90% accuracy just by the personnel packages on the field, and we aren't even pros. We weren't sure at the time if it was MLF or Rodgers changing the plays at the line of scrimmage.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:18 am

Everybody knew who was getting the ball on that 4th down.
Why they didn't run downhill on the LOS is beyond me.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:25 am

There was a hole on the left side. But the right side got absolutely blown up.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:34 am

And....so it goes, the high investment in Micah Parsons did not generate that "last missing piece" to assemble a superbowl team. JLove is mediocre....about the 14-16th best QB out there. That is the damning evidence to date...whether we face a strong or weak team, JLove isn't usually the best QB on the field. Even 2nd stringers pull off more impressive performance. MLF's biggest offensive challenge is to scheme a game that mitigates JLove's limitations. Love just doesn't see the open receivers, even (ahem) they get open...and yes, the WR corps is pretty mediocre too. So far....its Doubs and a bunch of potential. That potential is too often limited by JLove....so we'll never know if they are above average (not too likely, but we'll never know). Otherwise, MLF has to build JLove pass attack on RBs and TEs who get open by "leaking out". That and try to use Jacobs to "establish a run game" and hope the defense then loosens up on their pass rush frenzy.
This team is a loser (because they lost last week). They are losers until they prove otherwise.....so all posters who want to keep saying how the sky isn't falling, and how good this team is....well, talk all you want about potential. I say....they are losers until they prove they aren't.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:22 am

What's hampering Parsons at this stage is actually the Packers' offense. This is a defense that's playing remarkably well holding down the fort while the offense looks barely pedestrian. The Packers are perfectly willing to dance with opponents and play possession football rather than pushing tempo and throwing 5-7 than running 3-4.

This defense is made to play from ahead. They'll get LVN back shortly to deepen the DE rotation, but otherwise they're mostly healthy.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:31 am

The defense may need a Ray Nitschke moment to deliver a message to the offense: "Don't let me down."

0 points
0
0
mrtundra's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:38 am

I'd give a game ball to Sean Rhyan for doing a nice job at C, when Jenkins went down. Rhyan is just one of the Packers' OL men, who is asked too play outside of his college position, on a regular basis. Morgan is another. Jenkins is another. It would be nice if we drafted a T to play T, a C, to play C, and a G to play G. instead off all the jostling that occurs there.

0 points
0
0
TheKanataThrilla's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:52 am

I thought for sure that Rhyan was gone after this year, but he has become a priority re-sign at this point as we likely move on from Jenkins and have no developing C.

Do we bring Lecitus Smith back? Sadly, that is probably our only option at this point for the final 8 games.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:09 am

It seems likely that the Packers are going to have to sign an IOL off the open market this off-season, or they're going to need to promote from within and draft heavily to fill the depth chart.

I suspect we'll see Monk active from here on out although, if they don't want him to play, I don't know why he's taking up a roster spot. Donovan Jennings also took snaps at C in camp and he could be active, instead. Smith might be an option to back up the 3 IOL spots. I think he's still available.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:15 am

Where is Glover in all this? Isn't he off IR? Or is my memory gone and he's no longer on the team?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:32 am

He's on non-recall IR. He might resurface in 2026, but I don't see him as being anyone I'd be counting on.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:26 pm

Jennings had never played center. They tried a rushed conversion. It probably just set him back as a G. Any conversion will probably need an off season.

Lecitus Smith was released again last week when they signed 2 more TEs to the PS. Ironically, he played 6th OL/TE for the Pats last year and might at least have known how to line up.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:56 am

Bring a center in from the draft no later than Rd three; Slaughter, Lew, Brailsford. Maybe Rhyan makes a claim for the spot with his play on the final stretch? Toth, an UFA held his own for Philly.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:13 am

Spot on!
I keep asking why-
Why Morgan was drafted?
Why they are so set on playing
Tom at RT, when he can play anywhere.
Why Banks was signed for LG and not RG.

Whatever the promises made.
They must be Broken, for the good of the team.

The building of the OL has been sabotaged.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:57 pm

Stock... Tom cannot play anywhere that is why he is at right tackle.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:23 am

Rhyan is going to get a chance to make himself some money this offseason. He'd better grab on tight.

0 points
0
0
porupack's picture

November 11, 2025 at 07:50 am

The D was actually pretty impressive. Eagles receivers just make catches. Packers receivers just don't consistently (among some of the reasons packers lost. They did contain barkley for the most part....except...well... ok...he's barkley....and we just have Jacobs. Wait, we have Jacobs...but I mean to just give a little credit here to the D. Quay Walker showed up.

0 points
0
0
DoubleJ's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:04 am

According to Josh Jacobs the Eagles called out the Packers final 4th and 1 play. The play calling was absolutely horrible and lacked imagination.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:01 am

why in the hell didn't they use a time out there to really get set up, not rush things with another dumb run play out of the shotgun that the Eagles knew exactly what and where it was going...just another MLF blunder at a critical time...

0 points
0
0
Ray L 1122's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:05 am

Maybe keep Ryan at Center and Belton at guard. The O-line has to run block well enough to get the defense out of 2 high shell soft defense so Love can take some play action shots down the field. Until that happens there will be no big plays (especially now that Kraft's big YAC plays are gone.)
If they don't figure it and at least make and win a playoff game, there needs to be a coaching change. (Maybe Hafley as HC) 7 years is more than enogh chances to get it done.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:25 am

The Packers will be waiting for Reed to return to be their YAC guy, otherwise, they really don't have one now. The other possibility is to start using Williams on short and medium crossers and--heaven forbid--getting him the ball on the other side of the LOS.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 12:10 pm

Watson is the go to guy for the stretch run. Not sold on Wicks, too inconsistent. The key drop/"my bad moment"
pushes him back in the pecking order. Whyle looked professional and got out in front pretty well off the I-formation set to spring Jacobs. Use him more.

0 points
0
0
navydisposaleer's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:11 am

To me, this was amateur hour. The Packers are looking like a back yard scrimmage in some distant town. No coaching from a really bad offensive plan that must have missed the practice session. Just a bunch of individuals that don't seem to jell. Sort of like the team Lombardi got when he took the Packer job...1 win 12 losses. But there was a coach, a real coach who knew how to drill the players into performance. This LaFloor guy isn't even close. It all stems back to the 49er play off game after the Pack had just whipped Dallas. Total lack of offensive performance...run, run, run...let the QB go ice cold. And, it showed then as it does now. The offense simply sacrificed the defense There's nothing more obvious! The defensive coach knows what he's doing...and the players are responding.

0 points
0
0
navydisposaleer's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:13 am

To add to this, Love is simply too slow...can't think quick enough missing wide open receivers.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:09 am

He is too slow to go through his progressions, and shows all the emotions of a stump...give me some eye rolls or snarls or something to show your interested..

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:26 am

Both teams were amateur hour last night--mirror images of each other.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 01:50 pm

And yet the reflection back was them winning and us losing. Not quite a mirror image.

0 points
0
0
Wilment's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:19 am

Im going to keep this brief. I dont ever call out MLF, but 1.38 to go in a winnable game. 2 timeouts. Fourth and less than one, Why do we not burn a time out and get the right play and right personal on the field?? And why have McManus try that field goal again? Throw a Hail Mary for Gods sake. COACH, ITS OFFICAL, THE HOT SEAT HAS BEEN LIT. GO PACK Go!

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:23 am

Game Balls:

LB's - Cooper with the punch out and Walker were all over the field. They are really playing well.

Defense as a whole - They were playing really good. Except for 1 drive they played really well.

Lame Calls:

Offense - They have lost 3 games by a combined 9 points. All they have to do is have 1 drive in each game and they don't lose these 3.
They continue to shoot themselves in their feet. They can't sustain a drive without having a negative play blow it all up.

Refs - How do they miss 2 false starts on back to back drives. It looked like to me that the eagles moved early all night, but whatever. The tush push needs to go. The play is bad but they don't officiate it right. If they would officiate it right they wouldn't get away with it.

Injuries - They finished the game without Jenkins and Doubs. The WR unit was already without Reed, Golden. Williams, Watson and Wicks were all coming off injuries.

Three and Out:

LaFleur - Everyone is piling on Lafleur. Has he been perfect, no. But with how the offense is executing the plays called would it really matter who is calling the plays. They converted a 4th and 1 to have it called back for a false start. They had another 4th down dropped. They had a big play down the field that got called back because of improper lining up.

Love - Love needs to be better. But at the same time, how can he be better when the OL has been bad, and the Wr's are dropping balls. Or on the opening drive Watson for some reason turns into a DB and has the ball bounce off his head. If he just plays the ball he possibly catches it for a monster play that changes the game.

Gutey - Everyone everywhere is non stop piling on LaFleur. About his decision making, about his playcalling and whatnot. But no one is talking about Gutey. The players they brought in this offseason really haven't payed off. Hobbs and Banks have not really helped much. Banks had the false start that negated a 1st down on 4th down. But look at the draft class this year. Golden, Belton, Williams, SOrrell, Oliver, Brinson, Robinson, Williams. Golden has played and has a bright future, but he really hasn't had the impact yet. Belton hasn't played much. Wiliams to this point has been a Kick returner and gadget player. Sorrell has played some but is buried in the depth chart. Oliver is on PUP. Brinson has played some, but no impact. Robinson was picked up by another team, and Williams is Pup.
This years additions have done little to make an impact. Its time to throw some criticism towards Gutey.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:59 am

"Defense as a whole - They were playing really good. Except for 1 drive they played really well"

Actually just 2 plays on that drive. On the second play the receiver was covered well and just took the ball.

I'd take that every game.

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:04 am

Yeah very true.

0 points
0
0
THESZOTMAN1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:44 am

Last week Santa Szotman gave Game Balls to the offense and left the defense with coal in their stockings. This week, of course, it's the opposite. Only presents under the tree go to Jacobs, who continues to be the most consistant elf. Another goes to Musgrave, who ain't Kraft, but at least showed up. Whole O-line gets scratched off my list for now.
On defense, whole squad deserves great gifts. Holding powerful Eagle O to 10 points quite an achievement Only 2 "naughties" --- the Barkley screen and subsequent TD. But it was O that gave this "present" to the visitors.
Oh, and don't forget the 60,000 believers who thought they had the Christmas town advantage. 2 weeks in a row.
Ho, ho, ho. No, no, no.
Santa Szotman

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:55 am

LAME BALL: BRIAN GUTEKUNST. He is the architect of the failing OLine. He has been allowed to spend lavishly on his personal pet players and projects with little return on investment. I also think he pressures MLF to play his failed choices--Banks, Hobbs, Belton, Morgan are the latest gems for 'Mr. Urgency'. The failed list is long and he is the biggest problem followed by MLF.

MLF and his mediocre positional coaches

Game Balls: Evan Williams, Jacobs

I feel sorry for Love-he has little protection and that is squarely on Gutekunst

0 points
0
0
Lphill's picture

November 11, 2025 at 08:59 am

owner to MLF , if you don't roll over the Giants next week don't get on the return flight.

0 points
0
0
JohnnyLogan's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:07 am

La Fleur standing at a table with his back to the field as the defense tried to save his ass was embarrassing. He looked like a kid trying to quickly copy his friend's homework before walking into school. Le Fleur just doesn't come across as bright enough to think creatively and rapidly.

Your O-line is getting beat, throw quick passes. Watson was clearly your best receiver, so you throw more to Melton? What Le Fleur doesn't do that other coaches do is throw a lot to his best receiver; Amon St. Brown, Jamar Chase, Jefferson, Puka... they all get at least 10 targets a game, because they're the best receivers on their team. Le Fleur likes to keep the fiction going that all his receivers are equal, and that's how Melton gets more targets than Watson. It's just dumb.

He doesn't possess a sophisticated offensive mind, regardless of how he was sold to us. Seven years is long enough. It's time.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:18 am

Yes—great point concerning Melton—a part time receiver and we target him on critical plays.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:38 am

He was open.
Comments here are littered with "hit the open man"...well, Love did--right in the chest and it cost them a possession when it bounced out.

We can ask "why was he on the field?" and people seemed to be enamored with the idea of Melton filling out the depth chart at CB and WR in August, but this is really who he always was. He's not on the field at all if Golden, Reed, and Doubs are available.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

November 11, 2025 at 04:41 pm

Melton had a bad drop. However, hes a guy who has played 7 snaps on O this season I think and likely doesn’t get snaps there much in practice if at all (and didn’t in camp/preseason). Some understanding is probably necessary as well as questioning the handling of a player put in that position. No different really throwing Morgan in at RT having never had him practice there or get even garbage snaps or really any different from Glover being thrown in similarly at LG in the playoffs. Just repeating the same old missteps.

0 points
0
0
J-Rome's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:18 am

I didn’t want to read these articles at first because watching the game was bad enough, but here I am. The o line was awful in the first half. I’m not sure if it was the adjustments or if Rhyan really looked better than Jenkins. I’ve been saying LaFleur doesn’t trust Love, and it showed up again. I think LaFleur is the biggest problem . He doesn’t seem to have any confidence in the offense and he’s the play caller. He seems to only trust Jacobs but the line doesn’t open any holes for him. It hasn’t worked for several games now …maybe try something else?

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:31 am

The M.O. all season has been that the OL plays better in the second half than the first, so it's hard to tell whether it's the shift at C or halftime corrections. Still the play selection in the second half was more heavily skewed toward pass while it was about 50-50 run-pass in the first half.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:24 am

"the Packers clearly did not trust him from shorter distances either, attempting a couple of long 4th down attempts rather than long 50+ field goal attempts."

I had no expectation that anyone was going to hit a 64 yarder last night with a cross-wind and cooler temperatures (which deaden the football). That said, McManus' "practice kick" was only just short which got my hopes up. The actual kick never had a chance. Still, we've gone from the era of 50 yards being a long and challenging kick to 50+ being the norm. Your kicker needs to be able to hit those, and you have to have confidence enough in him to try. Again, that expectation needs to be tempered as the temperatures drop.

"The Packers are on the road next week, and will take on the Brian Daboll-less New York Giants.'

The Giants will be a bit of a wild card this week. Interim coaches usually aren't afraid to take chances and players often know that coaching changes put them on the hot-seat, too, so there could be surprises. This should be a team the Packers should beat, but sadly the book on the Giants is to run the football which plays into the Packers' inconsistency in sustaining drives. The Packers need to temper the desire to NOT put new looks on film for the Vikes, Lions, and Bears (the next three weeks) with getting healthy, offensively.

"The Offensive line was overwhelmed, the run game ineffective, Jordan was jumpy in the pocket and made inaccurate throws because of it."

Most of this is attributable to stubbornly conservative game plans.

0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:25 am

I've been very supportive of MLF since he was hired, and I guess I still am, but man.... let's just say I didn't love his work this week. I get it that being without almost all of your pass catchers (and Elgton Jenkins) is pretty rough, but man...... didn't love it.

I'm not willing to fire the dude just yet, but it needs to be better.

0 points
0
0
dobber's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:42 am

We'll see a similar game plan next week: the book on the Giants is to go right at them and slow down their pass rush which plays into the Packers' tendencies. But everyone plays to jam the A and B gaps and make the Packers slog through the muck. This should be a game, against a team in disarray, that the Packers get right, but I'm not getting my hopes up that way.

People are talking about Dart not playing and the Packers getting a break playing against Wilson (and they are, because you could see the air come out of that offense when Dart went out), but Wilson has historically had the Packers' number.

0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 09:56 am

What scares me about the Giants is that I feel pretty much the same about them as I did about the Browns.......

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:07 am

how many times last night did Aikman call out Love for not seeing open WR's, not leading his WR by putting the pass in the correct area, etc...Love is just not thinking quick enough to be a top ten NFL QB...blame it on the O line, which isn't helping for sure but with MLF and Love running things this team will never get past a wild card game...if they even make it that far...and losing two games in a row at Lambeau??? Pathetic...Ed Policy is for certain taking notice...

0 points
0
0
marpag1's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:13 am

uh.... they already did get past a wild card game.

Yes, I DO blame it on the O-line (and MLF was bad last night). Love was under pressure on 40% (!!!!) of dropbacks. That'll do a lot to make a QB take his eyes off the WRs and start looking at the pass rush...

0 points
0
0
bassrock's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:33 am

I agree with the Love statements. When he does throw deep it's always into triple coverage and you see a receiver 15 yards down the field wide open. Sure the offensive line is beat up so move him out of the pocket with short crossing patterns or delayed tight end off the line. Until 2 games ago they were saying how great the line had been playing. Seeing Lefleur on the sideline looking at the laptop seeing the wide open receivers and looking lost was embarrassing. He's lost it and can see he must know it.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:39 am

Man reading this stuff sounds like life and death. It is only game nobody will die because of it.

0 points
0
0
Packerpasty's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:37 am

No but it makes us drink more..

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

November 11, 2025 at 10:46 am

Bad knee or not Bak would be better than what we put out there stinking it up on o LINE.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

November 11, 2025 at 11:27 am

The Packers should just wear last week's crap brown uniforms for the rest of the season...they are morphing into the Browns: Great defense, but...

0 points
0
0
PyschoDad3's picture

November 11, 2025 at 05:14 pm

Another year of curb your enthusiasm and lowered expectations. At least the defense decided to show up last night. It all begins and ends with the line play you are not going to do much without an effective O-line. This group ain't got it, and it's only getting worse with the injuries. Unless they find a way forward, I think the best they can hope for is to make the post season dance, but even then it will probably be a one and done.

0 points
0
0
Since'61's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:15 pm

My Game Ball goes to the defense for an excellent effort again.

Lame Call: "Ditto" for all of my comments over the last 7 seasons about MLF and his offense.

Thanks, Since '61

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:21 pm

Kalani ... Jenkins devastating loss? From what i have seen Jenkins is either nursing some bad knees, or just going thru the motions until he can collect his 18 million and then walk away from the game. (Posters) Forget about him being a pro bowl left guard those years are long gone.

0 points
0
0
EricTorkelson's picture

November 11, 2025 at 06:42 pm

Kalani ... Agree game balls to Evans and Jacobs, both play with 100 percent effort and give everything they got...
Offensive line ... playing with undersized tackles, on record they don't give up many sacs but they are almost always get tightend chip help but still get shoved back into Loves feet... usually in seconds.
As far as Jenkins I posted what I thought of his effort this year, lets go with Rhyan cant get any worse.
MLF... Im not sure what the big rush was on the fourth and two at the end of the game? They were better off calling one of there time-outs and put something together that they had scouted during the game. Rushing to the line of scrimmage without a play called? Players out of formation? so of course the whole Eagles defense keyed on Jacobs. To me that was MLF biggest sin and the dagger of the game.
J Love... I said what I thought about Love and his once a week panic throws at last weeks game, One fellow poster said that I was not a fan and should go back to Indianapolis? ( what ever that means ) But no I'm still here ... and so are Loves once a week panic throws ... ( boom )

0 points
0
0