Curd is the Word: Building the Future One Invite at a Time
Pre-draft invites heat up the draft chatter
By GregMeinholz

As free agency news in the NFL begins to slow down to a lull, news of pre-draft visits begins to dominate the headlines. Yes, that's how bored we are and starved for football news. We're over-analyzing pre-draft visits. Nonetheless, it's news, and can sometimes give a view into the direction a team might be headed in the draft. And then again, it can be all a meaningless ruse. Teams may want to just kick the tires on a player they may not even have a shot at for future reference. If they're picking in the late 20's and a player is projected to go in the top 20, perhaps they want some notes on him for down the road, trade or free agent-wise. Or a player simply has a colorful personality, and a coach wants to see if that player will be tolerable in their building should they be the best player available.
Whatever the case may be, the Packers are up to seven pre-draft visits out of their allotted 30, and some of the names are intriguing.
Pre-draft Visits
Seven rookie prospects have been confirmed to have graced the hallowed halls of Lambeau Field. Perhaps the most intriguing prospect is Texas A&M Edge Rusher, Shemar Stewart. Stewart is without question, one of the players high on Packers fan's radar come late April. For good reason too, Stewart possesses an untapped potential of versatility and explosiveness that could be excellent in improving the Packers' pass rush. But, last week I said you could almost write Stewart completely off the Packers' radar because of his visit. This is because the Packers have a history of not picking anyone in the first round that they've had in for a pre-draft visit. And that's where Stewart is projected to land. Of course, I could just be being cynical and history could change, but tendencies are tendencies when it comes to NFL GMs like Brian Gutekunst.
Next up, we have Georgia Edge Rusher, Mykel Williams. Williams is another first-round prospect that like Stewart possesses traits intriguing to Green Bay, especially his motor to get after the ball no matter where it is on the field in relation to him. He has a quickness to chase down the QB as well as any other ball carrier.
Wrapping up the Edge Rushers, for now, we have Tennessee Edge, James Pearce Jr. Pearce is another first-round projected Edge that offers an explosive rush and high motor. Pearce is a bit intriguing for the "why" factor as he's had some character concerns leading up to the draft. The Packers tend to shy away from any of these prospects, but perhaps this visit was to determine if Pearce slides to them in the second round as a result of these "character concerns" and whether or not the Packers would pull the trigger.
We move to Cornerbacks next with East Carolina's Shavon Revel. Revel had a great start to his 2024 season intercepting two passes in three games before suffering a torn ACL. Revel is a projected first or second-rounder and perhaps one of the top intrigues about him is his decision to remain at ECU for the 2024 season despite options to transfer to bigger schools. Green Bay isn't a big flashy city, we all know that. If the Packers can grab a skilled player like Revel who has the loyalty to remain where they are despite big-city intrigue, they should likely jump all over it. Locker room loyalty alongside top talent can be hard to come by and Revel may offer it all.
Of course, we need a receiver, so next up is Texas WR, Isaiah Bond. Bond is a projected third-rounder and one of the fastest players in the draft running a 4.39 40-yard dash. Alongside that speed, Bond boasts soft hands and good route-running ability. Everyone wants the Packers to go either edge or receiver in the first round, well, if they go edge, Bond could be an intriguing prospect later in day two.
And now we're off to the offensive line. Arkansas State's Center, Jacob Bayer is a late-round prospect good at shutting down an interior lineman's bull rush and lifting defensive tackles out of leverage stances. With Josh Myers being cut loose this season, the Center position is wide open. There's a lot of speculation that Elgton Jenkins will be moving to Center following the signing of Aaron Banks at left guard, but it's unconfirmed. I don't think Bayer will be winning the starting job out of Training Camp, but he could offer some depth at the position and perhaps win it over down the road.
Last, we have Washington State Tackle, Esa Pole. Pole is considered a late-round prospect who may even be undrafted. So, why bring him in? Well, in 489 pass-protecting snaps in the 2024 season, Pole did not allow a single sack from the left tackle position. Perhaps the Packers see an underrated prospect that they want to determine whether he's worth a late-round pick or if they're better off just bidding on his services after the draft.
Pre-draft visits can have true intrigue when it comes to whether or not a team will draft a player, and they can also be a smokescreen. But, the Packers' pattern so far shines a light on what positions they may value the most heading into the 2025 draft.

Kristian Welch
On Friday, news broke that the Packers were bringing back LB Kristian Welch. After being part of the final roster cutdowns of 2024, Welch was released from the Packers and spent 2024 split between the Broncos and the Ravens. Welch is a special teams ace who will likely take the place of the departed Eric Wilson on the Packers' special teams unit if he makes the final 53 in 2025.
Last year I had Welch making the 53-man roster given his special teams skills as well as his ability to stand out on defense. But it just wasn't enough and he didn't make it.
Welch will have his work cut out for him in Training Camp this year. He may be a special teams ace, but the Packers will be looking to see how he can contribute elsewhere for whether or not they keep him, and showing out at linebacker is a good start.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Greg Meinholz is a lifelong devoted Packer fan. A contributor to CheeseheadTV as well as PackersTalk. Follow him on Twitter @gmeinholz and Bluesky @gmeinholz.bsky.social for Packers commentary, random humor, beer endorsements, and occasional Star Wars and Marvel ramblings.
__________________________




Comments (16)
LambeauPlain
March 30, 2025 at 07:50 am
This is not the star studded draft of years past. Yet, for the Packers it has solid potential to fit their short, and longer term needs (next season's 8-11 player FA class).
Most agree the Pack 2025 needs are DL, WR, OL, CB for starter candidates and quality depth. Decent classes at all 4 positions.
Consider 2026 FAs:
DL - Wyatt, Enagbare, Cox, Jr (probably add Clark?)
WR - Doubs, Watson
OL - Tom, Walker, Rhyan
CB - maybe Alexander if a 2025 "deal" is forged
(Also LB Walker & QB Willis)
Will Team Gutey be drafting with 2026 FAs in mind too? I think so. Decent draft for "two birds, one stone".
Given how much Gutey values draft picks plus the above short and long term strategic player needs, expect him to get another pick or two.
murf7777
March 30, 2025 at 08:16 am
Daunting! I can’t remember a year with so many Free Agents that played as many snaps as these players you’ve listed. As you suggested, I agree he will draft to these positions. I think Gutey is very aware and will draft accordingly to need more than BPA.
In addition, I believe he left quite a bit of salary cap on the table this year so he can roll it over to next year. I would expect quite a few contract extensions or changes to add salary cap as well. To fill out a strong roster next year, he will need all the fire power he can muster.
stockholder
March 30, 2025 at 08:24 am
Players that should be brought in.
. WR EMEKA EGBUKA, OHIO STATE- per PFF
There seems to be some draft fatigue with Egbuka, who has been talked about as an NFL prospect for three years. Don't fall for it. He's a high-floor, versatile and savvy receiver as a borderline WR1/WR2.
Landon Jackson Edge. Arkansas This guy is compared to J.J Watt
now;( after his pro day.) He's had a medical condition since child hood.
Deone Walker- Why was there a drop in production from last year.
Morrison hip- Is it a big deal?
Draft camouflage- Bringing in teammates.
What better way to find out problems not public.
Guam
March 30, 2025 at 08:35 am
Interesting list of 2026 free agents LP. Clearly the Packers are going to need to clear some cap space or lose lots of young talent. Alexander is an obvious candidate for removal as the Packers are reportedly trying to trade him. Many have identified Kenny Clark as a likely cut since he has significantly underperformed his contract for a couple of years.
I think a third candidate is Elgton Jenkins. Jenkins contract will expire at the end of the 2026 season and he will cost the Packers $24.8MM ($20MM cash, $4.8MM amortization of signing bonus) in 2026. Unlike Clark, Jenkins is playing well but the Packers rarely give third contracts to O-linemen so it is unlikely Jenkins will be with the team in 2027. Do the Packers keep him for 2026 and lose young talent or do they cut Jenkins a year early and use that money to resign a younger player? It wouldn't surprise me if they let Jenkins go a year early to keep R. Walker or another young player despite the fact Jenkins is playing well.
NFLfan
March 30, 2025 at 08:40 am
Only Zack Tom deserves a 4 -yr extension (don't over-pay, though)
-Watson (1 year) or trade---way too many injuries
-Doubs (1-2 year or trade)--likely has reached his ceiling
-Wyatt-(1-2 year) intermittent good play---also, too many injuries
-Walker- No 5th year option
-Sean Rhyan---??
Leatherhead
March 30, 2025 at 09:52 am
We should keep Walker. He's our leading tackler.
Myers for Humphry is not one of the worst draft mistakes in Packers history. Not even close. Bruce Clark. Rich Campbell. Tony Mandarich. Brent Fullwood. Too many to even mention.
Guam
March 30, 2025 at 12:07 pm
Yeah, I remember all those guys and would add Jamal Reynolds to that pile. Missing on draft choices is nothing new.
MitchAnthony
March 30, 2025 at 01:11 pm
I would also keep Walker based on his athletic upside and speed but certainly not on a fifth year option. That's just too big of an ask and way too expensive of a projection. It would put him in the range of some of the top paid off ball linebackers in the league and he just hasn't shown that he deserves that. Team friendly contract restructure, for sure.
Out of three years he's essentially shown three really good games and that was in the company of also playing with Cooper on the field. Walker needs to have the green dot and decision making taken away and given to a better decision maker and just let him play to the play. I think he'd shine in that situation.
The leading tackler thing is still a misleading stat for me. The middle linebacker on almost every team in the NFL turns out to be their team's leading tackler (with a few safeties in the mix). Being the leading tackler was a product of position (as stated) and opportunity. He was on the field for so many snaps because he wore the green dot. One would reasonably expect him to be the leading tackler just based on those two factors.
But yes, try to keep him on a "good" deal because they need his athleticism at linebacker. They may have way overdrafted Hopper and we have to yet see what the GB scouting dept seen in that player. Walker playing in the company of Cooper does solidify the linebacker room.
Leatherhead
March 30, 2025 at 02:29 pm
Being the leading tackler on one of the better defenses in the league is a misleading stat.???
Staying healthy and on the field is a misleading stat?
Why did the coaches have him wearing the dot? Why not somebody else? Is it possible the coaches thought he was the best choice?
MitchAnthony
March 30, 2025 at 05:04 pm
He was 52nd overall in the NFL for tackle stats. McDuffie was 60th. Had he not missed time with injury late in the season he may have been in 30s at best.
Why was he wearing the dot? Well, maybe he was the best option at the time and he got it by default. They say he handled that job in college. I still think they need to find a better option for that. Freeing him up from that responsibility might just unlock his potential.
Look, we mostly agree on the main point. You want him back, I said I want him back. I just wouldn't spend big fifth year money to do it.
LLCHESTY
March 30, 2025 at 05:57 pm
The problem I see with Walker is twofold; you can't pay two ILBs big money and Walker's best attribute is blitzing. The problem is Cooper is so much better at it that sending Walker doesn't make that much sense except Cooper is better in coverage as well so there is a bit of a Comparative Advantage tradeoff there but they'd be better served to find someone really good in coverage and mainly have Cooper moving forward.
The best thing for Walker would be to go to a team where he's the best blitzer. Hopefully they pay him enough for the Packers to get a comp for him in '27.
LLCHESTY
March 30, 2025 at 05:45 pm
You had the same general argument about Myers last year. Where is Myers now and what's he getting paid again? Starting and staying healthy isn't the win you think it is. Walker was still making too many mistakes last year and isn't instinctive enough to fully unlock his athleticism. As far as the green dot I don't understand how you can wear that helmet and hit the wrong gap vs the run as much as he does so it must be he's the only LB they want on the field all the time.
I wouldn't be against giving him some snaps at Edge occasionally. Don't think just go might be the best way he can make an impact.
GregC
March 30, 2025 at 12:07 pm
A couple weeks ago, I looked at the list of players the Packers have drafted after interviewing them in recent years, and I figured an interview with a particular player means they are about three times as likely to draft him. It's still a low percentage, of course, because they have 30 interviews and usually 8-10 draft picks. I can see why the first round would have the least correlation (0% so far). You don't want to tip your hand on your first rounder. I wouldn't rule it out, though. If you NEVER draft an interviewee in the first round, you will be giving away your intentions just as surely as you would if you ALWAYS drafted the player you interviewed.
Interviewees they drafted last year were Edgerrin Cooper, Ty'Ron Hopper, and Kitan Oladapo, plus they signed Donovan Jennings as a free agent after the draft, and they acquired Omar Brown later in the season.
It makes sense to interview James Pearce because of the character concerns. You want to see what he's like, and there's a chance he could fall pretty far in the draft. On the other hand, it's hard to take the Isaiah Bond interview seriously. He's 5'11" and 180 pounds. The Packers already have a small slot receiver (Jayden Reed), and he's pretty good, so it seems unlikely they would draft another small receiver, especially as early as the second or third round, which is where Bond is projected to be drafted.
LLCHESTY
March 30, 2025 at 05:47 pm
Bond is horrible vs man coverage too, they have enough of those.
gsd3
March 31, 2025 at 05:53 am
If they were to draft someone who plays primarily out of the slot, why not draft a guy who can also line up outside and can beat man coverage?
Jaylin Noel or Kyle Williams. Both are very explosive.
Racingdad
March 31, 2025 at 10:22 am
While I like Noel he’d be a great pick in third rd - i also love Tory Horton as he meets most of the needs at wr , very good against man coverage , good blocker , 4.41 40 can play x until cw comes back than play any position they need him too , he’d be the doubs replacement if he gets too costly - this is all of course if we miss on Higgins as he’d be gb’s best fit . I would also love gb to draft Donte thorton jr for his pure speed at -X