Cory's Corner: Turn Aaron Rodgers Loose
Aaron Rodgers is an artist. He needs to be given room to be creative.

There was one thing that stood out to me from the Week 1 epic comeback.
It wasn’t the shoebox window that Aaron Rodgers dropped a 39-yard touchdown pass to Geronimo Allison and it wasn’t the 75-yard scoot and score by Randall Cobb with 2:13 left for the eventual and improbable 24-23 win.
It was how much rhythm the Packers offense had in the second half.
“We were exclusively no huddle in the second half,” said Packers coach Mike McCarthy on Friday.
Rodgers was 17-for-23 in the second half with 273 yards and three touchdowns — on one healthy knee. He completed his first five passes to open the second half and completed his first eight passes to open the fourth quarter.
Rodgers is an artist. He needs to be given room to be creative. In Green Bay’s first four series, the Packers generated only one first down mainly because it looked like a plodding Big Ten team and not one that had the best passer of all time on its roster.
I’m not saying McCarthy has to give up playcalling, he just needs to take the muzzle off the offense. When Rodgers is in a no huddle, there is fluidity to the offense and all the pieces are a lot more aware because they know that No. 12 could rifle a frozen rope their way at any moment.
I’m also not saying that the Packers should turn their backs on the running game. McCarthy has always said how much he wants a running game and he said as much on Friday. “I do have confidence in our run game,” he said. “I think this can be one of the better run game productions when we sit here at the end of the journey.”
However, the coach who’s in his 13thyear leading the Packers also has to know that Rodgers is the heart and soul of this team. And that means letting Rodgers be Rodgers. He has always been more of a playground player, he relishes making something out of nothing and is able to take chances when other quarterbacks can’t.
Rodgers is smart enough to pick a defense apart at the line of scrimmage and he is also wily enough to know when a defender is low on gas. He constantly drives defensive coordinators nuts when he quick snaps the ball to get a free play when 12 defensive players are on the field. He is dialed in to every whisper of minutiae surrounding the game and it’s time McCarthy fully turned him loose.
While I agree that a semblance of a running game is important to Rodgers’ success, it cannot be forced. That’s like putting sand in a Lamborghini. The offense slows to a crawl as the skill guys look on in horror as the team’s best asset is given a complementary role.
Rodgers pulled the season opener out of the fire after the Packers fell behind 20-0. The Vikings aren’t the Bears. Minnesota will not allow the Packers to claw back into the game with more Rodgers magic.
That’s why Rodgers must be set free. Give him freedom to find his guys and he’s Mozart, but put limits on him and just he’s another street corner musician.
The Packers need Rodgers to be Mozart against one of the best front sevens in the NFC by turning Lambeau Field into the loudest concert hall ever.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________



Comments (68)
NickPerry
September 15, 2018 at 07:32 am
As much as I'd love to see the Packers running game pound Minnesota to hell, the RB who would have the most success against that defense is still suspended for telling on himself for smoking weed (WTF). Williams played well last season after the first few weeks of running up the O-Lines behind but last Sunday looked an awful lot like the first few games of William career. Williams is a GREAT blocker and a decent runner. I just don't think he's the type of RB who will have success against the Vikings Defense.
Montgomery should be used more in this game..Much more than last Sunday but if the Packers are going to beat the Vikings they need to do EXACTLY what Cory is suggesting...Cut Rodgers loose. Let Rodgers run the offense. Keep the pedal to the metal and tire out those big guys up front. Get Lewis involved this time and throw the damn ball to the TE your paying $10 Million a season to. Take advantage of Davante Adams abilities to separate at the line and get the ball in his hands quickly, let him do what he does well..YAC. Let those huge TE's clear the middle so Cobb can sneak in underneath and for God's sake throw the ball to Monty too.
BUT do all this with Rodgers calling the plays from the line. The LAST thing the Packers can do is what they did Sunday Night. And for God's sake let us see some of these NEW plays that were put in when the scraping of the playbook took place. The Vikings aren't a team McCarthy can be his stubborn self against.
Tundraboy
September 15, 2018 at 08:48 am
Love it NP. No need to hold back anything. This is exactly the type of game the newly scrubbed Playbook was intended for, I would think.
NickPerry
September 15, 2018 at 09:58 am
Kinda hoping so TB...Too bad Rodgers is somewhat limited with the knee but I think this could be a game where McCarthy's shows some new tricks.
TheBigCheeze
September 15, 2018 at 10:15 am
"......suspended for telling on himself for smoking weed (WTF)."------how about the REAL problem.......follow NFL rules!!!........
kevgk
September 15, 2018 at 11:35 am
I like to be hopeful and think McCarthy didn't prepare as much of a gameplan for the Bears' defense than the Vikings' because of the threat they pose. He wanted any different looks to be saved until now.
I realize that may not be the case, but I will never know.
Tundraboy
September 15, 2018 at 02:45 pm
Same thought crossed my mind as well. We shall see what MM does.
dobber
September 15, 2018 at 03:11 pm
One might say the same thing about the Vikes against the '9ers....
I think when it comes right down to it, these two teams have played each other and seen each other so much, either in watching film on each other or on common opponents, that they know each other very well. I really don't believe that the rework of the MM playbook will make much difference.
carlos
September 15, 2018 at 08:06 pm
Use our backs like New England does. Some quick designed passes to a RB can be similar to a run.
Coldworld
September 15, 2018 at 07:36 am
Let’s get Lewis involved and continue the Kendricks as H back theme from last week.
kevgk
September 15, 2018 at 11:37 am
Lewis and Kendricks or Montgomery would be great as two in the backfield or slot to help against extra rushers. When they get start to loosen the pressure and bring players back into coverage, either or both players can be brought out to be receivers.
Turophile
September 15, 2018 at 07:48 am
Allow 'Mozart' to play his Requiem 'Dies Irae" (Day of Wrath). What more needs to be said.
4thand1
September 15, 2018 at 08:48 am
I guess football has become more theater and classical music than punch him in the mouth?
Turophile
September 15, 2018 at 11:19 am
It can satisfy the appetites of both the visceral and the mental. This isn't an either/or situation, it's an all-inclusive one.
Tundraboy
September 15, 2018 at 08:49 am
"I think this can be one of the better run game productions when we sit here at the end of the journey.”
I must be really getting old. Is this is just some ridiculously convoluted way of saying ,I like our running game. I like the talent we have and the results may be there this year.
Plain language please, but besides take a stand once in a while. Not exactly dripping with confidence either way. Yeesh.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 15, 2018 at 09:56 am
I translated it as follows:
I know our run game is utilitarian right now with better receiving and pass pro ability than running ability, but when Jones returns we will be able to actually present a running threat and get real production on the ground.
kevgk
September 15, 2018 at 11:40 am
Giving any kind of emotion to the press does nothing to help his career, just bring outside stress on him. I would understand if he half asses it after 13 years.
4thand1
September 15, 2018 at 08:51 am
Chicago's defense is right up there with the queens, and AR tore em up in the second half. You can't go into a game like this playing it safe, come out with your foot on the gas.
Samson
September 15, 2018 at 08:58 am
You're wrong. -- The Bear "D" is nowhere near the Vikings "D".
This is only 1 game of a 16 game season. --- If AR is vulnerable to further injury, he shouldn't be playing.
It's so easy for the average fan to dismiss the "full picture".
4thand1
September 15, 2018 at 11:17 am
Ok so now I'm a "average fan" even though the Bears were a top 10 defense last year and added Mack to it. Nowhere near shows how your "full picture" is full of shit. Go sit in your corner, dislike everyones comments and grace us with your expertise. I'm done, not worth my time getting in a pissing match with you.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 12:04 pm
My wife says I'm highly attractive, but I consider myself average.
Samson
September 15, 2018 at 08:54 am
"Turn AR loose" or letting "AR be AR' is easy to say. -- The problem going into this game is the mobility of AR and the fact that the Viking "D" is fast and one of the best in the NFL.
If AR is put into a position where his protection leaves him vulnerable to further injury, a win or lose will be meaningless. --- If the Pack are without AR for an extended amount of time this season, the Pack are in trouble.
carlos
September 15, 2018 at 08:11 pm
I don’t know any more than any one else, but I think I’d sit Rogers. I do think he’ll play and play well, but am very concerned. I’m actually a wreck over this game. lol
porupack
September 15, 2018 at 09:05 am
Well there has been a fair amount of criticism in the past about Rodgers abandoning the play and too quickly audibling to a pass. So just saying...that this Rodgers-freelance strategy is opposite a solid stream of fan opinion. I think it would be better if MM and Rodgers actually game plan the first 20 plays with a pre-set progression of mismatch and periodic unconvention and break open the possibilities that we have with Monty and the 3 horsemen (Graham,Lewis and Kendricks),. Holmgren used to script the first 20 plays...then adjust based on the opponent's response. With an injured rodgers...i think designed plays based around quick releases is better as it neutralizes wiking's strenghts.
kevgk
September 15, 2018 at 11:43 am
I'm afraid thats what they did against the Bears and managed 30 yards or whatever. Not to say it won't work on the Vikings, but they need to find a better compromise between freedom and game planning.
Since'61
September 15, 2018 at 09:11 am
Rodgers is running the offense anyway just go with no huddle from the beginning. Build a 2 score lead or more and then go back to the huddle and the running game to chew up the clock against a tired Queens defense.
Just get the ball out quick and let Rodgers be Rodgers. Get the TEs involved this week and give the Queens more weapons to try to cover.
If Pettine's defense can keep the Queens under 20 points we win this one. Go Pack Go! Thanks, Since '61
sonomaca
September 15, 2018 at 09:26 am
Chicago’s defense just ran out of gas. Had Mack not missed preseason, I think the Pack lose that game.
Minnesota will hold the Pack to under 20 points. It will be up to the defense to contain Diggs, Thielan, Cook and Rudolph.
Hope Burks can go. Also hope Clinton-Dix and Matthews contribute more.
This is a game they’d have had no chance of winning with Capers.
NickPerry
September 15, 2018 at 10:07 am
Had Bulaga not missed all the OTA's most of TC, and played just 10 snaps in the entire preseason, Mack probably isn't even CLOSE to the factor he was in the 1st half...FIRST HALF.
Hell had the O-Line played together for even one quarter in the preseason maybe just maybe the Packers get the ground game going. I think the lack of playing time the Packers O-Line had in the preseason had just as much to do with Bears Defense taking it to the Packers as anything else in the first half.
Well THAT and Kizer...
MarkinMadison
September 15, 2018 at 09:30 am
Am I the only one who thinks the smart move is to sit Rodgers this week?
sonomaca
September 15, 2018 at 09:34 am
Well, they’ll lose the game and maybe the division and maybe a home playoff game.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 10:40 am
No, you're not the only one. I agree.
6 years of your franchise is more important than 1 game.
PatrickGB
September 15, 2018 at 09:34 am
It’s one thing to say what we should do. It’s another thing to actually do it. Frankly I expect the same ole same ole. The Packers start the game with two running plays followed by an incomplete or short of the sticks pass. Three and out. As the game wears on, only then will we see any creative plays. MM likes to see what works or doesn’t work before the game gets out of hand. I expect that we will try to get the TEs involved but MN is expecting that. I expect that there will not be much available in the passing game because of an aggressive pass rush from them. Yet as the game wears on some favorable matchups become available. I am not sure it will be enough to win at the end.
This is a game where we need our defense to step up. I would not be surprised if our secondary got a pick or two and carry’s the day.
sonomaca
September 15, 2018 at 09:38 am
If there’s no Pack pass rush, Cousins will pick ‘em apart. Like to see Daniels, Clark, and Wilkerson get a bit more push. I think that’s key because Pack OLB’s ain’t getting home without help.
NickPerry
September 15, 2018 at 01:56 pm
A-Men to that. I also think the Bears O-Line is twice as good as the Vikings, especially inside...Aww hell the whole line is better than the Vikings is. I think we'll see a lot of pressure coming from Daniels, Clark, and Big Mo. Matter of fact I'd be shocked if we didn't this week.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 02:13 pm
No particular reason, but I'm thinking we're going to see edge pressure getting at cousins. Not necessarily LB's, either.
We have some speed and aggressiveness at CB and S in 2018, and I think combined with a push up the middle from a DL that can potentially force Cousins' pocket a yard or two deeper than they'd like, that gives a DB off the edge a straight line of attack at the QB.
Jaire or Tramon have straight line speed, and Jackson/King are big bodies. Brice brings both elemenets. I think we could see any of them bring it from the slot. If a CB comes from the slot, I believe both HaHa and definitely Brice have enough burst and acceleration to quickly pick up the coverage without giving Cousins too much of a free look at the abandoned WR.
That'd be fun. Been a while since we saw effective DB blitzes. Plus, they always seem to elicit a "WTF" look on the QB's face. :)
NickPerry
September 15, 2018 at 07:00 pm
This is EXACTLY why I still have high, high hopes for Josh Jones. I think Pettine could really utilize him effectively blitzing.
Oppy
September 16, 2018 at 03:17 am
Jones flashed big in one game last season, otherwise, not too much good came from his rookie career without an equal and opposite negative.
I would be more optimistic if Jones made any noise this year in TC/pre season. Crickets. Maybe Pettine and the Packers are keeping him as a secret weapon, but I'm concerned something isn't clicking with him for whatever reason.
Hope his ankle clears up and we get to see him in action soon. Hoping for the best.
carlos
September 15, 2018 at 08:23 pm
Rotate Adams in more. And Lowry. Keep the lineman mixing it up and fresh.
Thegreatreynoldo
September 15, 2018 at 10:03 am
GB did start the game against Chicago with two runs. That strategy had the terrible consequence of picking up a first down. Series three does follow what you complain about. Otherwise, GB was pass-happy. For the third time, I am posting this info:
Series 1: two runs that netted a first down, then 3 passes, 3 incompletions, punt.
Series 2: 3 passes: 1 sack, 1 short completion, 1 INC, punt.
Series 3: Run, run, short completion to Cobb for 5 yards but just short of the sticks. Punt
Series 4: Pass, Pass, Sack Punt.
That’s four series. Teams only get 9 to 12 series per game, roughly.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 02:15 pm
TGR, I feel like this is your own personal "Trevor Davis" campaign.
You know how facts fly in the face of narrative. ;)
Thegreatreynoldo
September 15, 2018 at 08:47 pm
At any rate, three posts is getting too repetitive. [One or two were at the end of comment threads, so may have been missed.] I am done now; besides, a new game will make this old news.
Not impressed by the newly scrubbed playbook. It looks a lot like the old playbook. Still, we will see what MM/Philbin come up with against MN.
Oppy
September 16, 2018 at 03:18 am
I'd like to think I'm not as easily discouraged as you are, but I know deep down inside you're really just a whole lot wiser than I am.
JohnnyLogan
September 15, 2018 at 09:40 am
The difference between McCarthy and Belichick has always been that Belichick realizes he has a generational talent in Brady and lets him throw and throw and throw, which sets up the run. Teams that don't have a QB like that can't do that. The Packers have an even greater QB and yet McCarthy sticks to the tired principal of establishing the run game. Brady can barely move and has never had outstanding edge receivers, yet he machine guns 8.10.12 yarders and Belichick doesn't give a damn if he hasn't called a run play for an entire quarter. Rodgers is handcuffed. He was brilliant on one leg because who's going to defend those quick passes from the most accurate thrower of all time? Pepper them with short passes and that will open up the deep routes and the running game. Hope McCarthy wasn't only watching the 2nd half but comprehending.
NickPerry
September 15, 2018 at 10:15 am
And like the Packers Belichick hasn't really had that great RB, not really. So Bill B does whatever he had to to win. It varies every week and that's one of the reasons the Patriots are so difficult to defend, it's never the same.
Brady is also hardly touched week in and week out. He constantly throws the ball in about 2 seconds and is more than happy with 5, 6, 7 yard gains. Yes the running game is important. Yes the Packers have a nice blend of running backs. But with the best of the 3, the one who IMO is the best running the football is out the Packers are best off using the passing games as an extension of the running game.
marpag1
September 15, 2018 at 12:59 pm
Hmm. You'll have an awfully tough time proving this in a court of law, Johnny. Over the past 7 years the Patriots passed 57.3% of the time. The Packers' passing percentage was actually a few ticks HIGHER than New England's at 57.7%.
As for the raw number of passes thrown, Brady has thrown an average of 34.8 passes per game. That's all of two passes per game more than ARod, who sits at 32.8. Among the players who throw MORE passes per game than either Rodgers or Brady are such luminaries as Sam Bradford (36.1) and Blake Bortles (35.9).
Generally speaking, it's NOT the great teams that throw a lot. It's the shitty teams that are down by three scores.
JohnnyLogan
September 15, 2018 at 04:55 pm
You’re probably right Marpag I really haven’t looked at numbers. But I’ve watched a lot of Patriot games and the look is dramatically different. There’s just a steady stoccato of short passes to Edelman or the resident slot receiver and of course to Gronk. Not much tonedge receivers. And it’s been working.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 10:49 am
I would sit Rodgers (unless he's near 100%), as the 6 years of his contract mean more to me than 1 game.
That said, if Rodgers plays, I'd make a few changes:
1. Start Montgomery, and "unleash" him as the all-around weapon he can be. We don't have Jones, so use the guy who presents an all-around threat. Williams is a great blocker, but a poor threat. We need a threat.
2. Start both tight ends. If Lewis is such a scary blocker, then let's give Minnesota's fearsome front 7 a dose of their own physicality. No fear. Whether passing or running, force them to fight through, ostensibly, 6 good linemen.
3. With Adams fighting to a draw--and that's not bad--use our more physical alignments to suck the safeties up closer and threaten with Graham and Cobb.
4. If Graham has another game allowing himself to be slowed greatly off the line, then bench him and put in MVS for a deep threat. No excuses--take advantage of those linebackers/safeties or get the he__ off the field. But if possible, toss some jump balls to Graham until the Vikes show they can stop it.
If Rodgers plays, this is a game to either impose your will or play it safe and shrink in fear. Personally, I'd start Kiser and play to his physical strengths, blending simple reads and QB runs to put Minny on their heels. I'm fine with losing one game to let Aaron heal.
But my prediction is McCarthy will play Rodgers and then play terrified. He'll stick with Williams and Allison, leave Lewis on the sideline, and hope Minny doesn't blanket the short passes. Forget physicality and using your best weapons--McCarthy will play it safe.
Vikings, 27-13.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 12:49 pm
"I'm fine with losing one game to let Aaron heal."
The problem is, the Vikings are a division opponent and the Packers don't just suffer a loss, they also give the Vikings a win; that's a two game swing in divisional standings. Keep in mind this is a Vikings team who is the biggest threat to take the division, and one we typically have our hands full with in any given year at full strength, and our chance to nullify a loss this sunday would have to come in Minnesota down the stretch.
If Rodgers is cleared, he plays. They can always pull him if things look dire.
I would propose if you are going to bench Rodgers to try to get him "healthy" (which isn't likely to happen this season with what is most probably an MCL sprain at best), you do it vs. the Redskins(out of division) or the Bills(out of conference), before we match up with the Lions.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 01:39 pm
I have all that in mind, Oppy, and I absolutely do not care.
If he's not close to 100%, there is NO WAY I risk the franchise for one game. No way.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 01:57 pm
I would argue that Rodgers' "healthy" , typical, play style (holding ball for 4+ seconds, breaking the pocket on scrambles, running for the sticks on occasion) puts him in far more danger of injury and at risk of complete loss than the type of play we're likely to see from a hobbled Rodgers, which is one that is forced to stay in the pocket, take what's given to him, and get the ball out quickly like most NFL QB's are expected to (under 2.5 seconds), or get rid of the ball.
I think about where/when Rodgers has taken the majority of his hits over the years, and generally speaking, it's outside of the pocket long after the ball should be out of a QB's hands by most all reasonable standards. I know it won't change you mind, but mull it over.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 02:21 pm
Sorry, but here's why I disagree. Rodgers said yesterday he's starting to feel a little better. That means he's healing, and that the time off is beneficial.
There are many variants of sprains, and any of us claiming to know the precise nature of Rodgers's injury are full of crap. But one thing is likely: His knee currently has more inflammation and less stability than it will a week from now if he doesn't play.
That's all I need to know. This man IS the franchise. Our next 6 years depend almost entirely on him. This is one game, despite all the ramifications, and we must do what virtually no fans on this site ever do...
...think ahead.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 02:42 pm
People are more afraid to fly on an airplane than drive to the store on the other side of town. Accurate risk assessment isn't always intuitive.
dobber
September 15, 2018 at 03:02 pm
Imagine how good he'll feel if he doesn't play for a month or two...
Bottom line is: their chance to win on a weekly basis without #12 is not so good. They know they at least need to split with Minnesota (since winning the division is preferential to a WC) and likely don't want to have to go into the Twin Cities in a must win situation in late November. They're going to pull out the stops to win tomorrow. ARod isn't going to sit.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 03:13 pm
I wish I could summarize this well.
dobber
September 15, 2018 at 03:16 pm
I thought your airplane comment did...
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 03:22 pm
I'm not asking for a month or two. Exaggerating someone's point dramatically only shows you don't have a measured response.
One week is really, really fast for a sprained knee--any sprained knee. You guys should stop applauding each other and think ahead.
dobber
September 15, 2018 at 04:07 pm
It's not much of an exaggeration since an MCL sprain for a skill position player will frequently go 4 and sometimes 6 weeks. You seem to acknowledge that in your second statement. Aside from that, we all know that nobody has ever really said how severe the injury is (evidence showed he could play on it on Sunday against a good pass rush and play effectively). The Packers have protected that info like the nuclear launch codes...that was an exaggeration, too, by the way.
My comment isn't about thinking ahead. It's thinking about how teams are likely to view their games and situations. I don't believe in must-wins in September, but this game is really important. If he's at all capable, YOU know he's going to play. I know he's going to play. He practiced today...I would be shocked if he didn't play.
Andrew Lloyd Peth
September 15, 2018 at 06:31 pm
Oh, I know he'll play--I have no confidence in his coach. And he'll play well.
But my biggest concerns are valid:
1. McCarthy playing scared because he's risking the franchise.
2. Rodgers taking a less stable knee into a game with passrushers galore.
I just don't like it. It's too soon. He means too much to this team--way too much.
If we can't handle one September loss--even a key one--then this team isn't a contender anyway.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 08:02 pm
I don't think there's a single HC in the league, past or present, who wouldn't play Rodgers in this game if he's medically cleared
considering our back up QB situation- especially considering what we saw Rodgers do last Sunday.
I don't think you value divisional wins against premier competition as highly as NFL coaches do.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 08:36 pm
As to my suggestion that Rodgers' play style while healthy may be more dangerous to his health than playing while hobbled:
Career: 365 sacks, 150 games played. 2.43 sacks per game.
2016, 24 sacks, first 10 games played. 2.4 sacks per game.
2016, remainder of Regular season (injured hamstring vs. Eagles in week 12 to start this stretch) 11 sacks, 6 games played. 1.83 sacks per game.
Teams played during that 6 game stretch include Seattle (#3 sacks), Minnesota (#5 sacks) Chicago (#12 sacks) in 2016.
2018: 1st half vs. Bears: 2 sacks. 2nd Half after returning with leg injury: 0 sacks.
Odd coincidence, Rodgers' sack rate when mobility stifled by hammy in 2016 (1.83 per game) is quite close to Tom Brady's career sack rate of 1.79 per game (454 sacks over 254 games).
Thegreatreynoldo
September 15, 2018 at 10:11 am
I am saying strip MM of play-calling duties. He's awful. That fact that Clements was worse doesn't mean anything. Clements bombed as a play-caller in Buffalo, so his failure was entirely foreseeable. Can't we find an OC who can call the plays?
MM has a history of trouble finding quality coordinators. I think after a dozen years as HC, he finally found one great one, one average one, and one below average coordinator, so that makes this set of coordinators the best we've had in place during the MM tenure.
JonathanSpader
September 15, 2018 at 10:45 am
What do you consider Philbin? He's the Packer's OC do you think he can/should be the play caller?
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 12:58 pm
Philbin, Capers, Pettine have all been good enough coordinators to have earned promotions to head coaching jobs in the league over the years.
Heck, MM even hired a defensive line coach who was a highly successful **no joke intended** Defensive Coordinator during his career (Mike Trgovac).
You are definitely entitled to your opinion about MM's abilities as a coach, but I don't think the facts align with your assessment of his history of finding quality coordinators.
JonathanSpader
September 15, 2018 at 02:09 pm
You're missing Ben McAdoo in your list of coaches under MM that went on to be Head Coaches. He was not highly successful.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 02:45 pm
That's because my list was not about coaches under MM that went on to be Head coaches, but rather, a direct response to TGR's assertion that MM has problems casting decent Coordinators. :)
stockholder
September 15, 2018 at 10:33 am
If Rodgers can get on the field. Yes! This game is going to be an air show. Allison is not a depth threat. Break in a Rookie. Forget the running. Screen passes and short throws to the backs will win it. Save the running game for Detroit.
PAPackerbacker
September 15, 2018 at 08:45 pm
Allison is a deep threat. Look at that great catch last week in the end zone for a TD. I think MVS and his speed could prove to be an asset in this game as well. He has shown in pre season he can catch the ball. I agree short passes will work. They will slow down the pass rush just enough and create opportunities for the WR's to go deep.
Cartwright
September 15, 2018 at 11:53 am
The play of McCray has me worried for our QB. He picked it up in the second half but in the first half he was getting pushed back like nothing. I hope he has a strong game. He's the weakest link.
Oppy
September 15, 2018 at 02:03 pm
Hopefully the early punch in the mouth McCray took was the wake up call that practice and preseason effort by defensive linemen isn't up to speed with actual game day effort, it caught him off guard early, and he woke up and upped his energy resulting in his much improved play as the game wore on, and he'll be fine in week 2.
That's the hope at least. LOL. I can say that having watched him specifically at training camp during practices, he looked pretty good. That's the best I've got for you on the reassurance front.
He's definitely the weakest link, but I don't necessarily think he's "weak". Believing he's average, and hoping he proves more.
I was actually more surprised by Linsley's poor start to the game last week. Hope that was just an anomaly.