Cory's Corner: Offensive Line Is Where The Packers Will Succeed — Or Fail
Offensive line depth is what was missing last year. That could be the missing ingredient from disappointment and a deep playoff run.

As the Green Bay Packers report to training camp, all eyes are naturally drawn to quarterback Jordan Love and a loaded stable of skill-position weapons. Yet, the true fulcrum of the team’s championship aspirations lies somewhere much less glamorous: the offensive line. After an injury-plagued 2025 campaign that fractured any semblance of continuity up front, head coach Matt LaFleur and offensive coordinator Adam Stenavich are rolling out a reorganized unit. If Green Bay is to make a deep postseason run, building an impenetrable wall from day one of camp is non-negotiable.
Barring a standout summer surprise, the starting five configuration from left to right appears locked in. According to training camp projections tracked by Yahoo Sports, Jordan Morgan takes over the high-stakes left tackle position to protect Love’s blindside. Next to him is left guard Aaron Banks, while Sean Rhyan slides into the center position. Powerful sophomore Anthony Belton is slated to anchor right guard, and the exceptionally talented Zach Tom commands right tackle.
On paper, it is a starting group brimming with upside. In practice, however, it is a unit surrounded by valid questions about durability and cohesion. One only needs to look at last season to understand why depth will dictate this team's ultimate ceiling.
The 2025 season was a brutal masterclass in the necessity of a stable next-man-up philosophy. The Packers' front line was decimated by injuries, preventing the group from ever truly finding its rhythm. The most devastating blow was the midseason loss of longtime anchor Elgton Jenkins to a season-ending injury, forcing a cascade of roster shifts. Star right tackle Tom missed five critical games, including the late-season stretch, while dealing with a severe knee injury that required patella tendon surgery. Furthermore, Banks spent the year battling various nagging ailments. The proof was in the results compiled by Sports Illustrated: Green Bay sputtered to a 1-6-1 record last year in games where Tom was sidelined or heavily restricted.
Because of that harsh reality, the backups entering training camp this summer will play a role just as vital as the starters. Modern NFL seasons are a war of attrition, and Green Bay’s depth options must prove they can step into the fire without a drop-off in production.
Chief among those depth pieces is versatile rookie Jager Burton. Analysts at Packers Wire note that the fifth-round pick has already opened eyes by filling in across multiple interior positions during mandatory minicamp and OTAs. His ability to flex between center and guard makes him the ultimate insurance policy. Alongside him, center/guard Jacob Monk and swing tackle Darian Kinnard will see intense reps during camp. Other depth names like Donovan Jennings and Karsen Barnhart will also lock into fierce roster battles.
Ultimately, individual talent will only carry this group so far. Training camp must be about building cohesive muscle memory. With new faces in new places — particularly Morgan at left tackle and Rhyan adjusting to life at center — every single snap counts. If the frontline can stay healthy and the reserve unit can properly fortify the ranks, Jordan Love will have the time he needs to orchestrate a special season in Green Bay.
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
Cory Jennerjohn is a graduate from UW-Oshkosh and has been in sports media for over 15 years. He was a co-host on "Clubhouse Live" and has also done various radio and TV work as well. He has written for newspapers, magazines and websites. He currently is a columnist for CHTV and also does various podcasts. He recently earned his Masters degree from the University of Iowa. He can be found on Twitter: @Coryjennerjohn
__________________________



Comments (47)
KenEllis
July 21, 2026 at 06:33 am
I don’t think it was so much a lack of depth that hurt the OL in 2026, given that the starting C (Jenkins) was lost for the season and the unit still featured a former #1 pick (Morgan) in a back up role.
No, the bigger issue was that the OL just wasn’t very good.
Here’s hoping Morgan, in year 3, will finally prove worthy of his lofty draft status, Banks will begin earning the huge contract Gutey gave him, Rhyan will prove to be a better C than G, Belton makes a 2nd year leap, and Tom is healthy and regains his 2024 form.
For some that might seem like a lot of hopium, but with Butkus back to coach them up I’m sure most Packer fans are confident that the OL will be much improved in 2026.
Cheezehead72
July 21, 2026 at 07:59 am
I often wonder how good the OL would have played if Gute would not have moved Jenkins to center and start Rhyan at center. I still believe that was the biggest mistake made.
Oppy
July 21, 2026 at 08:41 am
I often wonder why people have the impression Rhyan at center is a good thing. I didn't think either played well at center.
Along the same lines, I'm not sure what evidence people have that Butkus is a great OL coach. I think the name sways peoples' opinion of him.
HawkPacker
July 21, 2026 at 09:05 am
Oppy, surprisingly, I felt that Rhyan played much better at center than guard and deserved the extension. Hopefully, he will build off of last year and improve even more.
I agree with you on Butkus. That is the first time I remember hearing anything positive about him.
Oppy
July 21, 2026 at 05:12 pm
Bad snaps and getting caught flat footed in pass pro at center was what my eyes saw from Rhyan last year. I’m hoping he settles into the position with a full camp at the position, but I’m not sure he’s a starting OL in the NFL based on his body of work thus far. He’d be a good off the bench at this point in his career. Packers seem to believe otherwise, I hope they’re right.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:23 am
Butkus should be shipped to Chicago where he belongs. No one will ever be able to convince me he's not a plant, sent here by the Bears, to ruin the Packers. I'm only half joking, it seems it must be true, or something like it.
Tundraboy
July 21, 2026 at 11:16 pm
Trojan horse always crosswd my mind, but when I think about it now, Butkus and Packers? I dunno. Sounds like Hatfields and the McCoys .Perhaps not the best marriage
packer132
July 21, 2026 at 10:15 am
News to me that Gute makes decisions on players and where to play them. I thought LaFleur was the head coach.
YouAskedForThis
July 21, 2026 at 04:59 pm
“I often wonder how good the OL would have played if Gute would not have moved Jenkins to center and start Rhyan at center. I still believe that was the biggest mistake made.“
Drafting Creed Humphrey instead of Josh Myers at Center could have prevented this domino effect. Ugh. Seemed obvious and still bugs me.
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 06:56 am
I find it head scratching to read that the issue last year was lack of depth, since, with the exception of Tom and Banks, 3/5 of the currently projected line are the depth from last year at their expected current year positions. Morgan, Belton and Myers were depth at LT, C & RG last season. Some prepared, some frustratingly not until forced into roles.
The issues last year were injuries to Tom and Banks (and one could speculate Glover as the then seeming back up RT) and poor positional assessments and resulting preparation by Butkus and Stenavich.
Hopefully Tom, Banks and Glover will be healthy this fall. Hopefully Kinnard is played as a G not a T and Burton is ready and capable or other depth emerges from a fairly interesting but unfamiliar group competing behind the starters. Unfortunately, Butkus and Stenavich are unchanged, so more missteps there are to be expected based on their track record since promotion.
NickPerry
July 21, 2026 at 07:36 am
"Yet, the true fulcrum of the team’s championship aspirations lies somewhere much less glamorous: the offensive line."
Couldn't agree more Cory. Last season, especially that 2nd half in the playoff loss to the Bears the O-Line was brutal. Until this O-Line SHOWS they can protect Love and actually open a hole for Jacobs so he's not getting smashed two yards BEHIND the LOS every run play, this team will go as the O-Line goes.
Lets hope Gutes draft picks start pay off. One thing for sure is he's NO Ted Thompson when it comes to the O-Line. Maybe Morgan, Belton, Tom, and Burton will start to change things. They have the talent. Do they have the COACHING?
Hmmm...I'm not so sure.
HawkPacker
July 21, 2026 at 09:08 am
NP, the IOL backups are okay but I don't see anyone as a backup tackle that would be good for multiple games. I would not be too surprised if we bring in a good tackle backup.
Guam
July 21, 2026 at 07:43 am
"...swing tackle Darian Kinnard..."
That statement is my biggest concern in a bunch of concerns about the OL. Kinnard is a better guard than tackle and yet it seems he is the designated swing tackle behind Morgan and Tom. With Morgan starting at LT for the first time in the pros and Ton recovering from a serious injury, the Packers need talented depth behind them and I have serious concerns Kinnard is that guy. I hope Lucas Glover can return from injury and make a big jump or Gute finds someone else at cut down time because Kinnard could be a weak link at swing tackle.
My second biggest concern with the OL is not the players, but the coaching staff. I do not care for their musical chairs approach to OL development (I think they have hindered Morgan's development) and I really am not convinced about their ability to evaluate player talent. Butkus and company need to show more than they have in the past for the Packer OL to succeed this year.
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 08:36 am
I hope Kinnard has not become the latest Butkus/Stenavich favorite who is over valued in the mold of Hansen/Newman long after they had repeatedly been whipped while the BS duo proclaimed them to be playing the best football of their lives. Kinnard is a G and an in-game emergency RT. Hopefully Glover or someone like Brant Banks or Dalton Cooper renders that moot in the coming weeks by clearly winning the back up role.
Guam
July 21, 2026 at 08:52 am
100% agreement CW.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:36 am
You don't think Kinnard is useful as a 6th O lineman? Pittsburgh had success with that + a 300# TE until somebody got injured, nobody figured out how to handle that
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 10:18 am
Kinnard wasn’t that good blocking in space as a T or a 6th OL. Does he have value as a 6th OL? Some, but I’d like to see if we could do better. However, he can be a back up G and play that role as well on game day so it’s not really relevant to his upside as an OL.
dobber
July 21, 2026 at 09:19 am
You hit on a key point: that Kinnard's not a LT, and even if you put a TE on his shoulder most of the time, I believe he'd still be a liability there. He can play RT as long as they don't leave him on an island very much. We hear comments from folks around here all the time that "Player X played LT in college, they'll just be the backup"...but several OL for the Packers were LTs in college, and few are capable of playing LT in the bigs. It's hard to knock them for that--it's one of the hardest positions to play. Until we see more in camp from the other backups, I think the best second LT at this point is probably Tom--but that's a guess.
"I do not care for their musical chairs approach to OL development (I think they have hindered Morgan's development)"
It's clear that the coaching staff decided they preferred Walker at LT for whatever reason. My assertion, after that, is that they decided Morgan was one of their best 5 and looked for ways to get him on the field. It turned out Rhyan was the better--but still not great--choice at G. I don't know why people keep saying that they hindered Morgan's development unless the assertion was that "he should've been playing, and not Walker." The proof on that one way or the other will be in 2026.
" I really am not convinced about their ability to evaluate player talent. "
They don't buy the talent. They have it handed to them. Right now, the depth chart looks OK--and potentially good--up front, but very weak after that.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:40 am
"It's clear that the coaching staff decided they preferred Walker at LT for whatever reason."
If Gutey were actually GM, I think he would've changed that. And the team would now be better for it. Not only would Morgan have some experience at his position, we would've gotten more value from Rasheed Walker.
Guam
July 21, 2026 at 03:58 pm
"The don't buy the talent."
Maybe poor wording on my part Dobber, but I was trying to point out that the OL coaching staff has done a poor job of figuring out where the talent they have been given should play. They have moved Morgan everywhere but center: Belton was started out at RT (when many scouting reports thought he would play guard in the pros) and had to move to RG without any preparation due to injury; CW referenced earlier debacles with Newman, Nijman and other who were played out of position. This coaching staff seems not to know what a player's best position should be. Either that or they so over-value versatility that they are forcing square pegs into round holes.
Regarding Morgan, play the kid at one position (RG?) rather than move him all over until LT opened up. Being a rookie is tough enough in the NFL; learning multiple positions that you never played in college just adds to the performance burden and could damage his confidence.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:34 am
I don't like the idea of using a swing tackle this season at all. With Jager Burton as depth for the IOL, you only need 8 O linemen on the roster to have one person specialize at each T position. That would free up roster spots for EDGE and/or D line, where they want a heavy rotation.
Not that I think they'll actually do that ...
HarryHodag
July 21, 2026 at 07:59 am
I still have a concern about Morgan. Given the opportunity to win the left tackle job he didn't. What has changed other than the position is open? I've wondered if Belton isn't better there. He was a LT in college. Not much has been said about Zach Tom. Is he going to be rusty after a lot of time missed?
Banks was hurt much of last year. Rhyan is learning the job.
Still much to be discovered.
Cheezehead72
July 21, 2026 at 08:04 am
I dont worry about rust from players coming off injury. These guys are professionals and have played for a long time. They do not forget how to play.
Now if you mean maybe not as strong. I would think he is training and keeping up his strength. I will admit I am most concerned bout him coming back too early or reinjury.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:45 am
All 5 O line positions are uncertain, but I'm not worried about Zach Tom being rusty. Just if he'll return at 100% from the injury. No bad news on that front, knock on wood ...
Cheezehead72
July 21, 2026 at 08:01 am
It all starts upfront. If the big boys do not play well the offense will not play well.
stockholder
July 21, 2026 at 08:02 am
WE have Too many injury prone players.
(PFF) projects the Green Bay Packers' offensive line
as the 27th-ranked unit in the NFL,
earning an overall offensive line grade of 66.2.
(Down from the 19th rating last year)
Maintaining the exact same five starters
for the entire year is just wishful thinking.
They're not elite and neither is the depth.
Last year everything back fired.
The recalibration will still struggle,
with consistency, run-blocking, and penalties.
This youth movement and transition phase,
is a big change from last year.
And the person responsible caused the defect.
Expecting a phenomenal outcome; just isn't how
you project success.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:47 am
PFF can't get things right when they're in the rearview mirror. You're banking on their crystal ball?!?
stockholder
July 21, 2026 at 12:23 pm
I'm not banking on any stats.
What I'm showing you is why
1. The packers are not super-bowl favorites.
2. That it is impossible for a head coach
to take "full blame", when his players are not
graded high amount their peers.
barutanseijin
July 21, 2026 at 01:52 pm
Well if PFFt says so, no sense playing the games. Cancel the season!
Lare
July 21, 2026 at 08:17 am
The consistent failures all across the line would suggest either a lack of talent or a lack of coaching. Giving whoever is responsible a raise is’n’t going to fix the problem.
NFLfan
July 21, 2026 at 08:37 am
Butkus was overheard saying 'he couldn't do much with this group'-Butkus isn't a star either.
Gutekunst cannot build either Line. Why would the same players be offering large-scale hope this year?
TXCHEESE
July 21, 2026 at 08:44 am
Not sure how Buttkiss is still employed. The last two playoff losses have shown that the backups are extremely unprepared when thrown in to the fire. These players have to be ready to jump in at a moments notice. That's their job and the job of the OL coach and OC.
dobber
July 21, 2026 at 09:29 am
OL8 and OL9 should be on the same par as a starting OL without dropoff? That's where the Packers were at the end of the season and in the playoffs the last two years. Being able to jump in at a moment's notice and being able to play at starter level say two very different things.
I agree: coaches know when they're working with diminished talent on the OL, and they need to be shifting play calls that don't ask those guys to do things that are beyond what they are able to do.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:48 am
Since coaches can't coach, trying to evaluate Gutey's acquisitions is impossible. Especially since he's not really a GM.
LeotisHarris
July 21, 2026 at 08:38 am
Somewhere deep in the bowels of 1265, you have to imagine someone is trying to make building an impenetrable wall from day one of camp a negotiable.
TKWorldWide
July 21, 2026 at 09:54 am
Hells yeah they is!
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 08:41 am
We’ve agonized a lot about whether certain players will live up to draft status/contract or recover from injury. In my view the same question could be posed equally validly about key coaches on offense. Lots of returning individuals on field and off who have not lived up to billing that will have to if this year isn’t to be a train wreck.
TKWorldWide
July 21, 2026 at 09:54 am
Please, no platooning this year.
Leatherhead
July 21, 2026 at 06:31 pm
Then how do you dress 8 and have backups for every position? A Center, a guard, and a swing tackle? And what happens when the second injury hits?
You've just got to develop your players to play multiple spots.
SicSemperTyrannis
July 21, 2026 at 09:54 am
I thought Monk was out with injury? Is he expected to be able to play at the beginning of TC?
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 10:24 am
I think that comes under “wait and see.” It’s about a 6 month recovery timescale for NFL types, so plausibly he could be ready either fully or in build up mode. Of course, we don’t know if there were complications or setbacks.
splitpea1
July 21, 2026 at 11:16 am
The thesis presented here is too simplistic. Without getting into all the nuts and bolts of the OL, sure it has to improve, both individually and collectively. But the Packers have had very good units going back 15 years and it still wasn't enough sometimes. Football games can be won or lost on the field with any position group or on the sidelines with the coaching decisions that are made. For example, what about the other side of the trenches? As the Ravens showed by running roughshod over us, a vulnerable defensive line will do us in just as much as an inefffective OL...There are many formulas for a deep playoff run, but the complete teams with the fewest glaring weaknesses are the ones the generally end up on top.
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 11:52 am
Generally I would agree with your position here. However, for us I think it’s accurate to say that how our OL performs likely determines how our offense performs. I believe that, if we are to succeed in any meaningful sense, our O must be good.
Certainly defensive collapse can undermine that, but even if the D is better than you fear, I doubt it’s so good we can carry a splittering O. Moreover, an O that can not only put up points but sustain possession is a powerful boost to the DL. That kind of offensive control makes opponents more one dimensional when they have the ball.
splitpea1
July 21, 2026 at 12:24 pm
I think it's probably more important for the type of team we have as well. I was just pushing back a little on the notion that an improved OL without regard to other position groups was the magic elixir that was going to get us over the top.
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 05:55 pm
I agree with that.
Coldworld
July 21, 2026 at 11:52 am
Generally I would agree with your position here. However, for us I think it’s accurate to say that how our OL performs likely determines how our offense performs. I believe that, if we are to succeed in any meaningful sense, our O must be good.
Certainly defensive collapse can undermine that, but even if the D is better than you fear, I doubt it’s so good we can carry a spluttering O. Moreover, an O that can not only put up points but sustain possession is a powerful boost to the DL. That kind of offensive control makes opponents more one dimensional when they have the ball.
Leatherhead
July 21, 2026 at 06:27 pm
Not just last year, but going back even further, we end every season with OL backups on the field in the playoffs. No Tom, No Jenkins. No Bakhtiari. Every year.
The five starters should be fine. Morgan played more snaps than just about anybody at four different positions last year, and now he can focus on the one he was drafted for. Banks is a solid veteran who will hopefully be able to practice in training camp. Rhyan has had the benefit of some time at center and an offseason to focus on it. Belton could make a big jump in his second year, and Tom is as good as RTs get. If this unit gets to practice and play together, they're going to do fine. We'll also have Kraft, who's a pretty good blocker.
The problem is that it's going to be somebody else. It's going to be Burton or Monk or Kinnard or somebody. And that's where I think the wheels start coming off. I'm really hoping that we make a move to get a more reliable offensive lineman because he'll probably be on the field in the playoffs.