Oops I got my prediction wrong. The Packers did win. Well good thing I did not put money on the game. I hope I did not sway anyone else to take the Colts.

It was a good game from what I saw. I missed some of the game because my wife and I went to an open house for a house that we ended up buying.

My boss told me that you can stream all NFL games on UZZU. It is a sport internet site and reasonably priced. Very clear picture.

I just know that LaFleur deserves a lot more credit than he gets.

When LaFleur first came in as the HC in 2019, the Packers were coming off of back to back losing years. They finished 3rd in the division both years. When he signed to be the HC the narrative was that no coaches wanted to work with Rodgers. That Rodgers was the coach and no HC was going to want to work with him.
All the Packers did was win 13 games 3 seasons in a row. Rodgers had only won 13 or more games 1 time in his career prior to this. Rodgers then turned in back to back MVP seasons. So naturally Rodgers got all the credit.
And then last year after they moved on from Rodgers and Love was in his first year, they finished the season with a 9-8 record. Everyone wanted to give all the credit to Love.

So to summarize LaFleur helped Rodgers have some of the best years of his career. He developed Love into a really good QB. And then you look at what happened on Sunday. He went into a game with his backup QB who just arrived 3 weeks earlier. It wasn't what they did that was the most impressive, it was how they did it. They didn't just hand the ball off and the RB's tore it up. They had so much eye candy going on it made it very tough for the defense.

LaFleur is a great coach and definitely deserves a ton more credit then what he gets!

Jever notice LaFleur’s grooming habits are not a topic of discussion after a nice dub?

The scripted plays were great. After that it was ride Jacobs primarily. We kept doing so long after that had been stopped. In fact we had negative net rushing yards in the third quarter. That might have been fine had we converted the Jacobs fumble TD, but we continued as if we had. In the end that gave the Colts a sniff (missed field goals cancelling out) when there shouldn’t have been one.

A+ for the first quarter script. Really impressive. A for the first half. After that D for the inability or unwillingness to adjust even slightly. Overall B- because it worked overall and suited that opponent.

LaFleur is a great play designer, the questions with him are in game adjustments and calling. Both showed up in this game. Let’s see how he approaches the next game, facing a D with strengths that counter what worked against the Colts very well, at least on paper.

Willis handled everything and well. True Doubs’ catch required a great adjustment, but one throw away (the right choice) and one to Wicks that was probably 50:50 and the rest were completed. None were turnover worthy.

LaFleur should have enough evidence that he can trust Willis to do more through the air. Now he has to identify the right parts of that playbook if Love doesn’t go and be willing to take more risks. If Willis plays, there isn’t much risk anyway. Not that I wouldn’t, and we won’t, try to run on them, but it would be foolish to expect that to work well enough to rely on it against the Titans.

LaFleur has definitely earned his stripes as a head coach. To get Willis ready to play and execute his game plan on short notice was quite impressive to watch. Go Pack Go!!!!!

I think LeFLeur has a much bigger problem then Willis and the run game. How the hell did the Eagles put up 34 points on them. I've heard and maybe wrongly that the phil of the pack org is defense is to slow teams from scoring as the offense puts more points on the board. I dont agree with that theory but yes if you score more then your opponent you do win. Until the opponent exploits your defense and puts up quick easy points and you dont.

IMO from the one game I saw, the defensive backs looked lost at sea most times and if it wasnt for errant throws leading to interceptions and the indy receivers who were wide open dropping sure first down passes, the outcome of this game would have been different.

No LeFluer better get the defense in order and fast. Me thinks the run game will be weaker against a Titans team that is prepared for it. Just sayin. There's no balance right now between the two.

This was my first packer game at Lambeau and enjoyed what I saw.

In looking down the road, based on Willis' game on Sunday and his type of talent, I can see GB, hopefully, run some Wildcat with Willis after Love returns. Give other teams something else to prepare for.

La Fleur definitely knows how to relate to quarterbacks, he seems to intuitively understand what each quarterback needs. He was artful with Rodgers, giving him time, attention and respect while at the same time, quietly managing Love's emergence.
Now he brings out the best in Willis. I give him credit. He's a natural psychologist or as another person stated- a 'QB Whisperer'

Of course, I'm laughing my ass off. It was only a year ago that LaFleur was part of the problem....the 1265 clown show, in over his head, riding Aaron Rodgers coattails, etc. And even this season, people feel the need to tell me how timid, and slow to react, and stubborn, LaFleur is, and how it's been 5 years without a Super Bowl and he should be replaced. And he picks bad staff, like Butkus and Barry, who need to be fired.

Sheeeeesh.

I felt better about this game at home against a weak opponent--even with Willis--than I did about the Philly game.

I've always thought favorably of LaF, but the only thing he did right on Sunday in terms of play calling was sticking with the run. LaF didn't do what most play-callers do now, which is give in to the desire to call fancy-schmancy stuff when the run is getting it done. Pretty much every part of that game plan could've been scripted by just about every person at the bar--and most of us did all week. The second thing he did right was get the OL to execute. The blocking was very good....but let's not lose sight of the fact that the Packers were playing an uncategorically bad Colts run defense.

Glad for the win, but Tennessee's defense is playing really well in the early going (admittedly, against a rusty Aaron Rodgers and the crappy Bears), and they know Willis. They'll be prepared for him. They have a mistake-prone offense, so I don't expect a lot of points this week.

Lafleur gets just the right amount of praise. If the team is prepared and executes, he gets praise. If they aren't then he gets criticized. Sometimes you win despite playing bad...and he should be criticized. Sometimes you lose despite playing very good football....and he should still deserve some credit. No over praise, but appreciate his body of work. Criticize when the team isn't prepared and makes mental errors. That is what leaders and managers get in the deal. What you do currently, not what you did last year. Its also irrational to judge an HC on Superbowl wins. Too many factors, too many odds. It is but one small measure. Who is ready to say McCarthy was/is a better coach than LaFleur?