Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - The Ugly, the Really Ugly and the Horrendously Ugly
The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.
By JerseyAl

OK, I've been watching football for a LOOOOOOOOOONG time. Over 50 years, in fact. Anytime the Packers were on TV, I was there. Over the last 15 years, thanks to NFL Sunday ticket, I haven't missed a game, even the preseason games. I'm one of those diehards that makes myself watch every second until the clock winds down to zero at the end of the final preseason game. Over the last seven or eight years, I would promise to follow anyone on twitter that was still watching during the last five minutes of the final preseason game. My reasoning was, they were fellow diehards, they type of people I want to associate with, and they deserved something, anything, for their loyalty to the Green Bay Packers football team. While a follow from me won't exactly get you anywhere in life, at least it was SOMETHING!
Anyway, in the annals of Packers preseason games, this was the bottom of the barrel. One must remember that preseason games are not played for our viewing pleasure - it's not about our entertainment. Still, I can never remember feeling so disconnected from the game-watching experience. At some point early in the third quarter, I tweeted (X'd ?) this:
I've never NOT watched EVERY MINUTE of every #Packers preseason game I had access to. This game is is testing my resolve...
— Jersey Al - GBP (@JerseyAlGBP) August 19, 2024
Fear not Packers fans, I held it together and stuck around for the final seconds, so my streak is intact, but boy did I ever feel entitled to some type of reward for my efforts.
How much of a pass do you give the Packers since they sat all of their starters and some key reserves? While I'm tempted to do so, it was such a collectively bad display of "professional" football, that I just can't. Sure, this game will be far back in the rear view mirror soon enough, but that doesn't mean I'm willing to excuse the lack of effort and execution. The players out there for the Packers were playing for jobs, spots on the roster or the practice squad. Yes, Sean Payton (more on him later) was treating this like a regular season game - he's trying to establish a culture of winning down there. But it's hard to believe there is that much of a talent gap between the Packers backups and the Broncos starters. In fact, I don't believe it. Sure, you could expect the Broncos to come out on top under the circumstances, and really it's not about the score. It's about being embarrassed. This team was not mentally prepared and didn't execute "day 1 installs" as LaFleur stated. Perhaps we should be glad the embarrassment happened now instead of the first game of the season, as it did in 2021 when the Packers were humiliated by the Saints.
Getting back to Sean Payton - throwing a challenge flag in the fourth quarter of a preseason game while ahead by over 20 points? Just trying to solidify his reputation, I guess.
BREAKING NEWS... Offensive line help is on the way! No the Packers didn't bring in a new player, but rather an O-Line consultant - none other than former Packers offensive line coach James Campen. Campen will work in scouting (mostly remote from his home in Florida) and consult on various O-Line related topics, including scouting prospects and evaluating the Packers' own players.
And now, a one-time quick take off on "Good, Bad and Ugly," which BTW, you'll see on various sites out there now, but I'm pretty sure Nagler was the first - certainly when it came to the Packers.
THE UGLY - The look on LaFleur's face after the Clifford interception.
THE REALLY UGLY - The offensive line. No way to sugar-coat it, it was bad the entire game, whether the Broncos had starters or subs on defense. Newman and Glover distinguished themselves with really poor performances. Both looked somewhat lost out there, which isn't a shock for a rookie but what's Newman's excuse? The line play was so bad, Andre Dillard earns some flowers just for being "decent" and not terrible.
THE HORRENDOUSLY UGLY - I'm tempted to say the entire game, but I'll go with that Greg Joseph field goal attempt. After praising him last week for his field goals normally splitting the uprights, he hits one so far right it misses the end zone net. The Packers have a real kicking problem. As it stands, I believe Carlson will be their kicker, but I sure hope Gutey is monitoring other kicking competitions around the league for waiver wire pickups.
TWO POSITIVES - Whelan was booming punts and no major injuries.
Bring on the Ravens!
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.
__________________________
"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP.
__________________________




Comments (76)
iamiz
August 21, 2024 at 07:12 am
1st, I’m glad to know I’m not the only nutjob who watches every preseason game to the last second.
2nd, all this fuss about Carlson is recency bias. His rookie-year FG percentage was right at the CAREER average for the two top packers FG percentage leaders, Longwell and Crosby, at 81%. And I expect Carlson to improve year-over-year.
3rd, Payton was coaching like it was the Super Bowl. MLF was coaching like he didn’t want to be there. Matt exudes apathy when he is inconvenienced (See London) and it affects the team. I know he’s not a Rah-Rah guy, but I wish he was “full throttle” regardless of the circumstances.
Cheezehead72
August 21, 2024 at 07:18 am
Not only do I watch the preseason games to the final second I record a bunch of them and watch them during the week. I make sure I watch all NFC North games and then others I select.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 08:15 am
Anders Carlson was a perfect 20 for 20 under 40 yards last year.
Coldworld
August 21, 2024 at 09:10 am
Until you consider extra points. Thats the real odd ball. Theres no logical explanation for that discrepancy other than statistical anomaly,
The average FG attempt in season in recent years is 38yards. In camp that’s about the lower end of what is attempted. The weather is of course better—with the exception of the crazy buffeting game in one day, which I personally would exclude from the data—but the length of kicks should outweigh that.
Carlson is essentially at the same percentage as last year but hasn’t been missing shorter kicks mimicking extra points, though there haven’t been that many. 82 percent is pretty decent therefore. Great, no, but decent. That includes the day I’d exclude for both as unrepresentative. On those days teams would not kick from those distances.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 10:30 am
An extra point is a point, but missed FG is a turnover, and on average, a turnover is worth 40 yards and 4 points. So a missed FG is a much, much bigger deal than the extra point. Seven teams did not miss an extra point last year, but the other 25 teams missed between 1 and 5.
As I've stated before, if you have a good offense, you should just go for two, especially if you aren't real confident in your kicker (29 teams made over 90% of their extra points. We did not).
To recap, especially with the kickoff rules change, I think if you have a kicker who's automatic inside the 40, then let him kick FGs from there. Longer FGs are going to be missed sometimes, and that's a net turnover so IMO you should only kick those long FGs at the end of the half, or the game.
GregC
August 21, 2024 at 11:33 am
I think Carlson was lucky that all of his shorter misses last year were extra point attempts. It's hard to conclude otherwise unless you think he was focusing better on field goal attempts for some reason. So he definitely had some cleaning up to do with the shorter kicks. I'm not sure how he's doing with that, as it seems like most of the attempts in training camp have been longer ones.
It's true that a missed field goal is like a turnover, but so is a failed fourth down conversion attempt. You get the 8-yard "penalty" for missing the field goal, but that's usually not enough to affect the coach's decision.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 11:46 am
YES. A failed 4th down conversion is also a turnover. We should be counting missed FGs and failed 4th downs as a turnover. I'd rather fail on a 4th down than attempt a long FG. If you make the FG, you get 3 points, but if you convert that 4th down, you might get into the endzone.
An article I read a long time ago said the most important thing in football was TDs, and that a TD was the only thing more important than possession. Not a FG. Trading a possible 6 or 8 points for an attempt at 3 is not good math.
In fact, the article actually counted punts as a turnover, because you lose possession and get no points. You get 40-45 yards on the punt....if there is no return.
I'm not that hardcore, but I do think teams punt too much. And as I said, I'd let my FG kicker kick from the 40, but not the 50 unless it was the end of the half or the game.
GregC
August 21, 2024 at 11:59 am
The league has gone strongly in the direction of going for it on fourth down, but there are still a lot of situations when the math favors the field goal attempt. Depending on the distance, you may have something like a 70% to 95% chance of getting the 3 points, while your chance at getting the TD could very well be a lot less than half of that--especially if it's 4th and long. I'm sure some people have run the numbers on this.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 02:25 pm
Yeah, that's it. Depending on the distance......if 40 yards is automatic, you might want to take the points, especially if you're on the road.
But let's take a 50 yarder....10 yards back (the 33 yard line). There's still a 60% chance you'll make this, but when you miss, it's the same as turning it over at midfield.
The comment about 4th and long got me thinking, and if you're kicking a 40 yard FG, that means you're on the 23. And if it's 4th and long at the 23....what happened? Yeah, take the points then, I guess. I think that once you get a first down on your opponent's side of the field, you need to kind of have a four down mentality. You're too far to kick and you're too close to punt, so you have to focus on getting another first down,and maybe another until you're in scoring territory.
Last year, we scored 44 TDs. Only 7 of those were from outside the 25 yard line, and two of those were on defense. Half of our TDs came from 10 yards away or less. We're not a "score from anywhere" offense, despite the presence of some very good deep threats
A TD, worth 6, and a successful 2 point conversion, is 8 points. That's worth 3 FG attempts. Go4IT!!
Coldworld
August 21, 2024 at 01:03 pm
While you are of course right about the points, the kick is the same. There should be no differential. If I’m evaluating the kicker, I therefore don’t differentiate.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 02:38 pm
But, obviously, something must be different, because you're getting different results.
Only 1 FG of 19 yards or less (the distance of the extra point) was kicked last year, so I have to rely on data from kicks 20-29 yards long. League wide, kickers made 239 out of 243 FG attempts from the 20-29. That's pretty good. 98.4%
Extra points ....despite being closer.....are averaging 95.9%
That's a 2.5% difference, league wide. Why? My theory is it must have something to do with the angle. Nothing else changes. Same snapper, holder, kicker. Same way it's practiced over and over and over again. But then I end up in the same boat as you, saying that there's no reason when there's obviously a reason that I don't understand yet.
Coldworld
August 21, 2024 at 03:10 pm
I can find no parallel instance of a kicker with the difference in extra point conversion rate to that of field goals being so different in a negative direction. It’s a true outlier. I suspect it’s a statistical anomaly or he was approaching them differently mentally or physically for some unknown reason. There is no difference in the kick process proscribed. The good news is that he can make the kicks reliably, as long as no one tells him it’s an extra point. Blindfold and ear defenders on the sidelines?
crayzpackfan
August 21, 2024 at 11:20 am
Cold-
The one common denominator here for these kickers is the long snapper and holder. The holder seems fine, but could all 3 of these kickers be struggling because of bad snaps or just a collective lack of confidence in the snap? How can 3 kickers all be equally bad?
Coldworld
August 21, 2024 at 03:12 pm
They could. A good LS might add a percentage or two over time. Whelan is, by all accounts, a naturally excellent holder.,
LambeauPlain
August 21, 2024 at 09:29 am
Carlson's misses last year were pushed right (even PATs) and he still kicks with that fade.
He is attempting to adjust for it by kicking the ball toward the left upright and see it fade in between the uprights.
Not sure why Bisaccia is unable to get him to kick it straight. The kid has a strong leg.
Bitternotsour
August 21, 2024 at 11:35 am
he kicks with a draw, not a fade. when he misses, he kicks it straight. the ball is supposed to work from right to left.
Coldworld
August 21, 2024 at 03:18 pm
This is not unusual in kickers. Straight kickers are favored in domes but, supposedly, draw or fade skills are better equipped for success in inclement conditions. I can’t speak to that, as I could never draw to save my life. I do not, however, see that as a reason to dismiss his kicking style as somehow inherently inferior.
jont
August 21, 2024 at 01:04 pm
👍
egbertsouse
August 21, 2024 at 07:53 am
You’re talking FGs. Carlson can’t even hit extra points. Quit making excuses, the guy is a joke and everyone knows it.
Mister Chievous
August 21, 2024 at 01:50 pm
lot of down votes for making a good point. probably your delivery. lol. the cited field goal % ignores the fact Carlson missed several extra points. anyone happen to know how many?
packerbackerjim
August 21, 2024 at 07:15 am
My bar for exhibition games is no injuries.Next!
Cheezehead72
August 21, 2024 at 07:16 am
I find it interesting that the present two time Super Bowl Champions were playing their starters while MLF decided to rest his starters. Maybe that is why Andy Reid has been so successful. He does not hold back. He coaches to win and his his team does.
When the Packers were looking for a new HC years ago I wanted them to hire Sean Payton instead we got McCarthy. Ok both won a SB. After what Payton said last year I did not and still do not care for him but once again I see a coach that is going to try to win every game even if it is preseason. He will be successful.
There is something to be said about a winning culture. “Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing.” "Winning is not a sometime thing; it's an all the time thing." Vince Lombardi He knew what it took to have a winning culture. If the coaches coach scared the team plays scared.
Oh and there is the point that our kickers who are all average at best make up 3% of the roster. Let's get it over with and make Carlson the kicker and release the other two. At least he is younger than Joseph. But I agree we need to start looking for a different kicker.
I am glad the Packers brought back Pearson. Not that I think a FB is required in this offense I do think a FB provides a different look to the offense and yes they can be used on STs. I believe with the new kickoffs you want a good blocker in the landing zone with the returner to block. Let's see if this coaching staff tries that.
SicSemperTyrannis
August 21, 2024 at 08:03 am
Get the best kicker in Europe and replace our current #3
MLF has his own strengths and weaknesses, he still needs improvement but I'm not sure the Denver game told us anything about that?
MLF did say that after reviewing the film the players were actually trying. I would have liked to have seen coaches practicing their in game adjustment, beginning with the O line. There was other talent and other combinations they could have tried. Of course I'm not privy to their plan but it didn't seem ideal to me.
Hopefully everybody learns from film study?
Mister Chievous
August 21, 2024 at 01:54 pm
the best kicker in Europe?
barutanseijin
August 21, 2024 at 08:16 am
There is barely any difference between Payton & McCarthy. Both have one ring, each blessed with good QB play during their peak years , & both have. a .620 lifetime winning percentage. Nevertheless, Packer fans — maybe Dallas fans, too — seem to think that McCarthy is a moron and that Payton is some kind of world historical genius. If McCarthy’s style has its limits, so too does Payton’s.
I think McCarthy deserves a lot of credit for reining in Brett Favre, who had fallen into some very bad habits under Shermie’s laissez-faire regime, and for developing Rodgers. I’m not sure Payton would have been able to get as much out of either Favre or Rodgers.
Cheezehead72
August 21, 2024 at 08:35 am
I think you might have misunderstood my comment. I never said I thought McCarthy was not a good HC and that Payton was better. My point was at the hiring I thought Payton was the better hire. McCarthy was good but at the end his play calling got predictable. I would know when he called a run or a pass play. My comment was more negative about MLF. I love his play calling and that he is more innovative but I hate that he seems to lack that go for the gusto and instead coaches scared. We need a coach that is willing to put the dagger in the opponent.
barutanseijin
August 21, 2024 at 11:14 am
I disagree that Payton was the better hire for the Packers, for the reasons outlined above. I suspect that he might have come off as a bad fit with TT and the rest of the Packer brass — or organizational culture for that matter. Packer people he ain’t.
I do agree that he was probably the better hire for the Saints. I don’t know what the Denver people were thinking when they hired him. If they wanted to get rid of Russ ASAP, Payton was perfect. Otherwise, i dunno. At any rate it’s all what ifs & speculation.
Bitternotsour
August 21, 2024 at 08:58 am
There's a significant difference between Payton and McCarthy. McCarthy has honor and dignity.
Nostradumass
August 21, 2024 at 09:52 am
Amen! I am worried that in spite of abundant talent added and some great play for this team in spurts, there is no Full Throttle approach to winning. Shouldn't matter if its starters, second or third teamers, when it's your chance your focus should be on winning, against the guy in front of you or the other team. This team under its current leadership has shown up for games sporadically without focus. Agree with Vince, a winning attitude comes from always striving to win every game or why bother to play.
barutanseijin
August 21, 2024 at 11:17 am
Full throttle in the pre-season?
Disagree. That’s the way to run out of gas in December & the playoffs, if you get there.
Coldworld
August 21, 2024 at 03:20 pm
Many of those players will be pumping gas by then.
Mister Chievous
August 21, 2024 at 02:01 pm
focus is and should be on winning REGULAR season games. that means keeping your key players from getting injured and not laying your game plan cards on the table for meaningless games. it also means fully evaluating everyone trying to make the team so that you can build your best roster. can't understand why folks here are so upset about losing a pre-season game where 31 players were held out. if Alexander and love blew out their knees in this game everyone would be screaming something entirely different.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 02:48 pm
You do realize that Reid toiled for years before winning a Super Bowl, and that the active coach with the highest winning percentage is Matt LaFleur? Reid also seems to have become a much better coach since Mahomes ended up in KC, just like Belichick was a better coach after Brady started playing instead of sitting on the bench. Maybe Andy Reid is a good coach who had a great player dumped into his lap?
Our kicker hit 20 out of 20 from inside the 40. Why replace him?
WestCoastPackerBacker
August 21, 2024 at 02:52 pm
If Andy Reid didn't have Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, we would get to see just how much of a winning culture he'd have by having starters play in the preseason. I don't think it translates much. There's teams that play starters that fail in the season, teams that don't play starters much or at all and go deep in the playoffs. This is just frustration that the team didn't look ready or play well in Denver. Who knows, maybe they were gassed by the altitude too.
Needing to cite Lombardi after every Packer loss is getting old. LaFleur had the youngest team in the league, with a brand new starter at QB almost beat the team that represented the NFC in the Super Bowl, after pounding the crap out of the 2nd seed in the conference. That counts more towards a winning culture for me than a preseason games with third stringers. Disappointing? Yes, but that's about the extent of the takeaways.
You want a team to lay an egg earlier rather than later, and learn what it takes to get up for and stay up for a game. It matters much less how you start the season (and friggin preseason) than it does how you respond and grow throughout a lengthy season. The PATS used to look awful, just awful at times, particularly early in the season. But you wouldn't say Belichick didn't have a winning culture, would you?
And Andy Reid lost a lot of important games over his career and didn't really garner success until he got Mahomes on his squad.
GregC
August 21, 2024 at 07:23 am
After that thoroughly enjoyable preseason game in Cleveland, we were due for a letdown, but not THIS. My wife stopped watching in the first half and cleaned the bathrooms, and I think she enjoyed the evening more than I did. I did find it hilarious, though, that the Packers ended up with 2 points. How often does that happen? A part of me was hoping they wouldn't score at the end, just so that 2 would stay on the scoreboard forever. And it did! When the safety happened, I was excited for half a second because I thought it was Lukas Van Ness making that awesome play, but no, it was not #90, it was #60--some guy who has zero chance of making the team.
For what it's worth, Matt LaFleur said that after watching the film, he did not think there was a lack of effort from the players, it was just a lot of mental mistakes. He could be right. I can't say I saw anybody lollygagging out there. They just played terrible--most of them anyway. I'm hoping for some redemption against the Ravens so they don't go into the season on a sour note.
murf7777
August 21, 2024 at 08:39 am
lollygagging….nice word, gave me a nice laugh this morning. Anyways, I don’t believe more than a couple players who are fighting for their livelihood wouldn’t give their best effort. I think it is more that they just don’t have the ability to make the play and at times it looks like a lack of effort. Those couple of players who might not give their best effort probably don’t really care if they play football or not and will be cut. Mlf fell into what many fans do and that’s overreaction right after game. You learn so much more watching something a second or third time, especially with the benefit of slow motion.
T7Steve
August 21, 2024 at 07:53 am
I managed to watch the game all the way through. Except for the game it was kind of funny because it was a Denver broadcast team, and they were acting like it was their Super Bowl.
I wouldn't be worried about the game result so much if it didn't sound like they got their asses handed to them in practice too. I'm sure the 1s got reps then.
porupack
August 21, 2024 at 07:58 am
If there had been a major injury, I'm sure the comments would be 180 degrees different about throwing it all in on winning in the preseason.
I'm grateful to Nagler and hoped he cashed in on allowing Clint to borrow that movie title. Brilliant. The Good, the bad and the ugly.
That eerie echo sound; wahwawhaaa............ will never die. Let's play that over the stadium whenever the pack gets into the red zone. whaawawhaaaaaaa..
porupack
August 21, 2024 at 08:01 am
Just to annoy the viking fans and their love of the annoying kazoo.
Cheezehead72
August 21, 2024 at 08:09 am
Not from me regarding the major injury. Yes they are pros that are playing against pros. The idea is to be ready for the first game.
Untylu1968
August 21, 2024 at 10:00 am
You hit the nail on the head, with the 180! Bitchers will always find something to nitpick about!
MooPack
August 21, 2024 at 08:16 am
On brining back Campen, I posted this last night on another thread:
Thank the Lord. I think OL is the weakest link the Packers have. I thought it was one before the draft and it slightly improved, although I thought better choices were available. For whatever reason the Packers have not made good choices with OL draft picks, scheme, personnel, and rotation with this group since LaFleur took over. Bringing back Campen is a great move. Hopefully he is given a lot of leeway going forward on those decisions.
TKWorldWide
August 21, 2024 at 08:22 am
Starting group pretty good. Reserves very questionable.
GregC
August 21, 2024 at 08:27 am
The O-line played quite well at the end of last season, and all the starters are back except Jon Runyan, who's been replaced with a first round draft pick. They've got a decent #6 in Sean Ryan. I admit that things get shaky after that. I was hoping they would take another O-lineman in the first three rounds of the draft. Still, I think the O-line is in pretty good shape overall.
dobber
August 21, 2024 at 09:18 am
I'll disagree in that while there have been head-scratching decisions at times, the OL play on the front lines and the ability to get replacements to play capably has been good in most situations. It's been a long time since this OL has been bad.
I'll agree in that I think that while the front-line players on the OL are very capable, the depth is looking scary. I think they'll be OK if they don't have to go very far into the depth chart, but if injuries really start to take a toll, they might be in real trouble. Most teams can't go to OL#8 and still play well, though.
As for Campen: in all, another set of eyes--so long as the coaches in house are willing to listen--is always a good thing. But if he's not on-site, he's not going to add much more for guys currently on the roster than what they'll get in their own self-scouts and film review.
TKWorldWide
August 21, 2024 at 01:34 pm
Gr8 minds, brother!
WestCoastPackerBacker
August 21, 2024 at 03:03 pm
You think Rasheed Walker a more than capable LT starter is a bad choice? How about 4th rounder Zach Tom, and Pro Bowler Elgton Jenkins? Jenkins and Tom can also play multiple positions. Walker and Tom and Rhyan are all part of the same draft class and are key offensive line players.
Who are the bad draft picks? Runyan was serviceable but not worth an extension, but another team sure thought he was. But not bad for a 6th rounder. Rhyan didn't have much of a rookie year, but shared the starting spot last year and looks like a decent back up at the very least, maybe an eventual starter. Too soon to tell how good Morgan or the rest of this year's picks will be.
So the bad picks are Royce Newman, Van Lanen and I'm assuming Meyers from the 2021 draft class? Seems to be GB has hit on an many good line players as most teams in the league do. But they've found true players in later rounds, which is a huge benefit to roster building overall.
MooPack
August 21, 2024 at 09:19 pm
2019 (LaFleur first year)
2nd - Elgton Jenkins - Stellar pick. The Packers best lineman when healthy
2020
6th - Jon Runyan - serviceable, but not resigned
6th - Jake Hanson - gone (conveniently left off your list)
6th - Simon Stepaniak - gone (conveniently left off your list)
2021
2nd - Josh Myers - below average is the opinion of many (missed on Creed Humphrey)
4th - Royce Newman - Hopefully gone
6th - Cole Van Lanen - gone
2022
3rd - Sean Rhyan - Jury still out, but looks like backup is his role. Not been able to crack starting lineup for good.
4th - Zach Tom - Great pick. I had him my moc drafts in exactly the 4th round. 2nd best Packers lineman. Also many opinions that Center is his best position. I'd agree, but the Packers have had little choice with the lack of better Tackles.
7th - Rasheed Walker - Luck. He was the 3rd of their four 7th rounders. Everyone passed on him including the Packers til then. Glad he worked out, but no great draft strategy here.
2023
13 picks. Not one lineman taken. I think that was a mistake. Although I can't argue with the picks through the first 6 1/2 rounds.
2024
I think they realize the mistake and lack of quality on the OL by taking Jordan Morgan in the 1st round.
1st - Jordan Morgan - I Like Morgan. It seems he is going to be the starting RG (the least important position on the OL), but I would have taken Kingsley Suamataia. I had him rated end of 1st or 2nd round. Word out of the Chiefs camp is he could be the steal of their draft and is being setup to start at LT. Funny that the Chiefs also took Creed.
5th - Jacob Monk - probable backup
6th - Travis Glover - Will he make the team?
LaFleur made a statement a couple/few years ago that he didn't place a lot of emphasis of draft capital on OL. I wish I could find it, but remember it. I think that is a bit of arrogance on his part in his scheme over talent. 3 (one is great, one is below average, one we don't know for sure) guys out of 13 picks drafted 2nd or 1st round. 9 of 13 taken 4th round or later, 7 - 5th round or later. The rest a few UDFA's that we have no idea what they actually bring to this team. I'd say they do not put much stock in drafting OL earlier. You get what you pay for. Bringing Campen back is a tell that the scouting and evaluation has been lacking for OL and they finally want to correct that. And this is not even getting into their decisions on who should be playing where in some big games. I'd bet if you asked Packers fans what the biggest thing is that could derail the offense 8 out of 10 would say the OL.
Bitternotsour
August 21, 2024 at 08:40 am
The Campen hire seems like a shot across the bow for Stenovich and Butkus (and maybe LaFleur). Campen developed a lot of talent and seemed to be able to plug and play his way to winning seasons. I had no idea he was only 60. That he answers directly to Gutekunst is sort of eyebrow raising.
And yes I think it's time to consider whether it's nature or nurture.
dobber
August 21, 2024 at 09:34 am
"That he answers directly to Gutekunst is sort of eyebrow raising."
Not if his primary roles are in scouting. That's all under Gutey.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 10:43 am
Well, Campen was McCarthy's Oline coach, and we always had a pretty decent Oline during those years. Perhaps Gutekunst sees these guys we've been developing for years.....Jones, Telfort, Rhyan...and thinks Campen might have something to offer.
As I've noted, by Thanksgiving (which is when the stretch run starts), we have at least 50 or 60 practices. You can improve with practice. Our starters are pretty decent and hopefully we won't need too many of our backups to start games for us.
Bitternotsour
August 21, 2024 at 11:31 am
Hence my thought about second guessing Stenovich and Butkus (and by extension LaFleur).
If my predecessor was brought in as a consultant, I might take some notice...
or as Gutekunst is happy to say, we want competition at every position.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 12:01 pm
Stenovich and Butkus got it done last year. We had injuries early, and we had to cobble stuff together, but by the time the stretch run started, this was a pretty good line.
I think this has more to do with some of these long term development projects that just don't look ready to play yet. As much time and money and effort as we've put into these guys like Caleb and Telfort and Rhyan, it'd be nice to get some return. And you've got the two rookies, Glover and Monk, that need to improve. IF Campen can get even ONE of these guys to become a better player, it helps a lot, because right now, none of them really do.
Matt
August 21, 2024 at 09:04 am
Nope, 3-38 to Saints was way worse. 1. It was a regular season game 2. Starters playing, so we put everything we had on the field. I was hoping I am having a nightmare and when I wake up it will be normal again. The only reason Broncos game was worse it is from viewer's perspective, it was menaingless so we've had less emotion and emotion is what keeps us watching - positive but also hope for improvement.
Honorable mentions: regular season 7-23 Vkings in 2022, preseason 0-19 Bills 2021.
ImaPayne2
August 21, 2024 at 09:14 am
Thanks Al. You obviously care a lot and so do a lot the posters here.
How about a twist to the discussion from an old geezer.
LeFleur is a guy who learned under some very young bright innovative minds. He got his job under their coat strings as many other coaches do.
The difference, while trying to make this a LeFleur team, hes doing some things wrong and some right.
His team was not motivated to win. He was the only coach to play vanilla ball with non starters the whole game. Reid and others used the starters and playbook to work out kinks. Thus Reid wants to win and knows who sre the players that will be playing day one. LeFleur is afraid of injuries and misses the objectives because, he just aint that good a coach. Keep in mind he inherited Rodgers and a good team
LambeauPlain
August 21, 2024 at 09:44 am
"Keep in mind he inherited Rodgers and a good team."
Matt inherited a team that was 6-9-1. He coached it to 13-3. Don't know how you measure what a good coach is, but apparently wins and losses aren't in your metrics.
Untylu1968
August 21, 2024 at 10:48 am
He's a Vikings fan, cut him some slack!
Bitternotsour
August 21, 2024 at 11:37 am
they (Vikings fans) determine good coaches by their preseason record. It's all they have.
Leatherhead
August 21, 2024 at 11:55 am
He inherited a team that has missed the playoffs two years in a row and took them to the Championship game his sfirst year.
He has a higher career winning % than any other active HC. His career winning percentage of .675 is 11th all time, just behind Halas and Shula and just in front of Paul Brown and Tony Dungy.
The average ranking of his team in the division is 1.6, putting him 8th all time; Lombardi was 7th.
IOW, go ahead and talk as much trash as you want about LaFleur. His record speaks for itself.
ricky
August 21, 2024 at 09:20 am
Admittedly a small thing. Since Payton is coaching in Denver, the "Mile High City", wouldn't he be trying to set a winning tone "up there" instead of "down there"? This is what happens when the game is so terrible, you're afraid of getting a flag for "piling on" if you give an honest assessment. That the OL doesn't look that good is no real surprise. Stenavich was an excellent coach. But as an OC? I suppose "mediocre" or "bland" would be applicable. And Butkus, from what has been shown on the field, is not ready for prime time. And ready or not, in 15 days the games will begin counting. Add in the Packers recent problems with slow starts to the season, and this could once again be a story of two seasons. Then again, winning the SB is getting hot at the right time. Just ask Eli Manning.
NFLfan
August 21, 2024 at 09:26 am
Let's not forget--the Broncos embarrassed our starters as well during their joint practice.
dobber
August 21, 2024 at 09:28 am
It's easy to shrug this off as a preseason game--and every team will just flat-out lay an egg at times--but the extent to which this performance sucked was epic. We're crapping about the fact that the Packers sat their 1s and some 2s. It's nothing new: this was pretty much the M.O. for this team in preseason for several recent years.
This wasn't a situation where there were many bright spots, even among guys fighting for roster spots. If anything, it felt more like guys were playing their way out the door more than onto the 53...that's not how you want to form up your roster. That said, it sounds like the team has had spirited practice time since...but that's in the echo chamber of playing against yourself.
There are hard decisions to make on the OL. I was supposing they would keep 10 with contracts coming up and the need to develop the depth chart, but some of these guys who were on the edge are making themselves look like easy walks to the PS and it's hard to justify keeping them.
PackfanNY
August 21, 2024 at 09:28 am
I don’t get caught up in “exhibition “ football. At least the “result”. My only problem is what did we accomplish? Sure seemed like most of the game was handoffs up the middle to keep the clock running. The very first set of plays included not one but two long passes that seemed like throw it up and see what happens. They were close but no cigar After that? Slant routes galore and runs up the gut. Not sure anybody got anything out of this game. We can’t complain about injury risk because most of the team wasn’t even active.
HarryHodag
August 21, 2024 at 09:39 am
The recent Broncos game was close in horrible to another Packers-Broncos game I saw at Lambeau. It was the Bart Starr coaching era and after a decade of losing the Packers fans were in no mood to watch yet another inept team take a beating from Denver. By the end of the third quarter the Broncos were moving the ball at will. When the Broncos scored the vast majority of fans were cheering for the Broncos, cynical and frustrated at yet another bad team.
Bart was asked after the game about the reverse cheering and claimed he didn't notice.
But Sunday's game was very close in bad vibes.
RCPackerFan
August 21, 2024 at 09:40 am
"How much of a pass do you give the Packers since they sat all of their starters and some key reserves?"
A pass for the game? yeah. I mean how many teams backups would beat a teams starters? Also how different would this game have looked had a couple of DPI's been called against the broncos.
Lets be real about this. The Packers won the night. Did they win the game, no, but they won the night. They did not have an injury that could have derailed the season. Think back to Jordy Nelson tearing an acl in a preseason game.
BREAKING NEWS...
I love this! I love that they are bringing Campen in as a scout. Its a great move!
"THE HORRENDOUSLY UGLY - Greg Joseph field goal attempt. As it stands, I believe Carlson will be their kicker, but I sure hope Gutey is monitoring other kicking competitions around the league for waiver wire pickups."
I'm good with Carlson. Just go with Carlson, and if someone better comes available, go with him. I'm with Nagler on this.
LambeauPlain
August 21, 2024 at 09:57 am
Since James Campen left the Packers in 2019 to become the Browns Associate HC/OL Coach, he has bounced around every year until being let go by the Panthers new HC in January.
I am thinking Matt is recognizing he has OL issues with thin depth. Campen would have been a good replacement for Butkus in January, but Matt has shown tremendous patience with coaches, even when they fail.
Having him report to Gutey but be step one to eventually taking over as OL Coach. It seems Jim wants to remain in FL for now.
LambeauPlain
August 21, 2024 at 10:11 am
^^Having him report to Gutey may be step one...
FYI CHTV...the edit function is not working. It ends up landing me on another page.
Bitternotsour
August 21, 2024 at 11:40 am
edit has been balky on a pc, but I've been able to get the page back up. I think it's a pop-up issue with the annoying advertising taking precedence over a functional website.
Spock
August 21, 2024 at 10:07 am
Al, One of the two positives you mentioned was Whelan "booming" punts. In the thin air of mile high stadium that's less of a positive and more of an expectation (don't get me wrong, I love his punting). I like the Campen hire, but as others have stated his working from long distance isn't likely to have a massive impact on the current roster, but I'd love to be wrong about that assessment.
splitpea1
August 21, 2024 at 11:21 am
"It's hard to believe there's that much of a talent gap between the Packers backups and the Broncos starters." As far as our OL backups go, that could be part of it in addition to the lack of development and experience with a few of them. But does Newman survive the Turk this time like he did last season? You would think not.
Speaking of cuts, I prefer the old way of doing it gradually after every preseason game. Get rid of some of the clutter and focus on the players that have a more realistic chance of making the team.
GregC
August 21, 2024 at 12:08 pm
I also preferred it when there was more than one cut down day. It gave the preseason more structure and a sense of the stakes getting higher toward the end. Now the coaches just throw all the backups out there for every game. Some are playing for a roster spot, but most are playing for a spot on the practice squad.
Swisch
August 21, 2024 at 02:40 pm
As an hysterical nutjob, it's somewhat comforting to know that Jersey Al saw this embarrassing debacle of a game by the Packers somewhat the way I did.
This is not to say that Jersey Al would agree specifically with my postgame comments. Almost no one agreed with my postgame comments, and indeed many made sure to register a dislike, or to say something in disagreement, if not displeasure.
Oh well.
I do wonder about how quick people are to criticize me but not to criticize the Packers.
I guess I'm the Lisa Simpson of CHTV.
***
In any case, I think it's Matt LaFleur who sets the tone of timidity for the Packers.
He seems like the kind of person who is afraid to do anything that isn't popular, who is exceedingly careful to fit in to a fault -- which, I guess, makes him much different than me, although I prefer popularity if possible.
I don't think that lack of leadership gets the Packers another title.
However, here's hoping I'm wrong or that LaFleur changes for the stouter.
I like the guy, and am rooting for him to grow as a coach.
We all have room to grow. The hard part is knowing what to keep about oneself that is good, and what to change.
I hope LaFleur and I figure it out in good time.
***
P.S. I think I was right all along about Aaron Rodgers being the fault line around which the Packers would crumble under pressure for heartbreaking losses at the end of the season -- as can be seen in my comments of September 28, 2021, a couple of weeks after the debacle against the Saints referred to by Jersey Al.
As indicated in my main comment of that archival thread (5 likes and 13 dislikes), I was unpopular in my concerns about Rodgers in those days and months and years.
Maybe I rubbed some people the wrong way by using such words as "arrogant" to describe Rodgers in many of my comments of days gone by.
I wonder how many fans would admit today that they didn't want the Packers to part with Rodgers in the past, because I doubt there are many fans today who would still want Rodgers to be on the Packers in the present.
That seems like the kind of question Lisa Simpson would ask -- uncomfortable and unpopular.
Maybe I'd be better off sticking a crayon up my nose ;-).
RWood832
August 21, 2024 at 04:02 pm
Jersey Al, I appreciate that you stayed until the end. I attended the game in person and did not. We left after the Pratt fumble. I will watch the entire game on NFL+ this week, when I get over the helpless/hopeless feelings I have after watching the joint practice on Friday and the game on Sunday. My goal in preseason is to avoid injuries and to see if there is genuine talent among young players to get excited about. I still remember the impression that I had watching Nick Collins and BJ Raji in their first GB preseason games.
What we witnessed in Denver on Friday was disheartening. The Packers' offense played most of their snaps on the field away from where we sat so I focused most of my attention on the Packers' defense. Going into year 3, I am still not sure what GB has in DT Wyatt. I saw him get double-teamed but wondered why because he did not do much in man-on-man situations, including the 1-1 drills against Denver. I don't see a 5th year option in his future.
The CRAZIEST thing I saw in the practice was TJ Slaton dropping back into zone coverage on two consecutive plays in the final 2 minute drill. I hope that play is scrapped from the playbook - shades of Preston Smith manned up against Tae Adams last year (NEVER AGAIN!!!!).
E. Jenkins in 1-1 drills was incredible. His opponent did face plops on two consecutive plays. Mr. Jenkins is a STUD and GB is so lucky to have him. On the other hand, Mr. Newman has no place on the O-Line this year. It was evident in the practice and the game. My favorite rookie lineman this year is Jacob Monk. He gives 110% effort at all times. I do hope that Jordan Morgan gets healthy and is able to challenge Rhyan for the RG spot. If he does, then GB will be in good shape because Rhyan looked good in 1-1 drills and in the practice reps I saw.
P. Surtain II is a stud CB for Denver. I think Jaire is going to bounce back and I have been very excited about what I have seen from Stokes so far. I wish I could figure out what happened to Kalen King last year at PSU but it looks to me that he is limited athletically and will be a PS candidate.
Biggest weakness for GB, other than Kicker, is easily the LB crew. Mr. Hopper impressed in the game but not so much during the practice. I am sorry that Goforth suffered a concussion because he impressed considering how short his time in camp was. I am looking forward to Cooper's return. I was very high on him coming into the draft and feel like he will be a key contributor to the D. The rookie safeties each had their moments over Friday and Sunday and AJ, Jr. deserves to stay on the 53 man roster at S too. A young, young S room but loaded with potential. They are running a ton of single high safety and McKinney and Bullard are both going to do lots of running to the sidelines to get in on plays this year. GB's interception numbers should be up this year.
Finally, a shout out to Mark Murphy!! He gave my son and I Field Passes for the pregame warm-ups. It was an incredible experience and did blunt the sting of having to sit through another poor performance by the team when the whistle blew (same as last year in the same place).
Jersey Al, one reason we left early is that I had to get an early start Monday for my drive back to St. Louis. All my best JA.
Qoojo
August 21, 2024 at 06:19 pm
Maybe the one positive aspect from the game is that Newman is gone.
Hopefully, the packers K is on another roster. The 3 in camp right now are all too inconsistent.
It was a brutal game to watch. I made it to 4th quarter but not to the end. I do not remember the last time i didn't make it the end of even a preseason game because I like watching to see any future bright spots. I remember thinking during game that the Broncos backups were far superior. There was nothing. Kind of wish the 3rd string qb was brought in earlier.
Gman1976
August 21, 2024 at 07:19 pm
If my memory serves me correctly, the 49ers in their glory years would lose all kinds of preseason games; and of course go out and stomp the competition for another Superbowl win. Getting stomped in preseason may not mean much for some, but it sure grates on me. I just hate losing.
Tundraboy
August 22, 2024 at 11:30 pm
I'm with you. And listening to the Denver minor league announcing...... I even found myself wondering why they were taking a knee. There were 20 seconds left I wanted to see something,!