Confessions of a Polluted Mindset - No Laundering Needed

The Weekly Packers Brain Drain from Jersey Al.

My source inside the Vikings organization tell me the Vikings saved some money this week by not needing to have Sam Darnold's jersey laundered. Look, I watched a lot of Sam Darnold when he played for the Jets. I liked him coming out of college and would always tell my Giants fans friends that he would be a better quarterback than Daniel Jones. He has a strong and accurate arm when he can comfortably step into throws, When he's under pressure is when it all falls apart and the interceptions and fumbles happen. The fact that the Packers could not make him even slightly uncomfortable in the pocket in the first half was like handing them 28 points, and that's just what they did.

As for the other quarterback in this game, Jordan Love was erratic, which shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone considering the rust & not 100% knee he played the game on. Love did start to find his way in the second half - not coincidentally when the Packers started going uptempo. There were still some mistakes (he could have easily had two more interceptions on those long throws to the end zone), mostly related to trying to do too much, where patience would have served him better, but I can forgive all of that. Overall, from the mistakes to the frantic late game drives and comeback attempt, Love perfectly demonstrated why he is much more like Brett Favre than Aaron Rodgers (as a person, he's not like either, and that's probably a good thing). And right on cue, this tidbit from ESPN Stats: Jordan Love is the first Packers player to throw four TDs and three INTs in a game since, you guessed it, Brett Favre in 1999.

The challenges and reviews were so one-sided yesterday, they challenge flag should have been purple. Note, I'm not complaining about the decisions, they were mostly justifiable - the one exception in my eyes was the catch by Wicks where he had his hand under the ball when it touched the ground.  That's supposed to be a legal catch, but it wasn't called that way.

Coming into the game, I would have bet the house that against this particular team, if the Packers had the option, they would choose to take the ball first. It seemed like a no-brainer to me that you would want to try to get up on the Vikings and make them do something they haven't had to do this year - play from behind. Matt LaFleur disagreed with me. I have no idea why.

Place kickers around the NFL are doing amazing things - it could be the "Golden Age" of field goal kicking - everywhere except in Green Bay, of course. Narveson is the only kicker in the league that has missed a field goal under 40 yards. Seeing Packers castoff Greg Joseph go five for five for the Giants this Sunday was just rubbing salt in our wounds. Austin Siebert, who was available when the Packers claimed Narveson, is currently 10 for 10 on field goals and 9 for nine on extra points in three games for the Commanders. That's like dumping an entire salt mine on our wounds.

Meanwhile, Daniel Whelan had two punts in the game that traveled over 70 yards in the air. Having to punt is not necessarily a bad thing for the Packers - field position is often a big factor in winning games.

There were some clueless moments during the TV broadcast of this game. One was when LaFleur had his hissy fit.  The broadcast team went on and on for minutes, showing multiple replays of Romeo Doubs falling short of the goal line as if that was what LaFleur was mad about.The second was the announcer yelling TOUCHDOWN after Melton recovered the muffed punt. I mean, you do this for a living and you don't know it can't be advanced? Really?

If you are going to compliment the defense on anything (hard to do after a horrendous first half), it would be that they held the Vikings to a field goal in the second half and managed to force three punts, including getting stops on two third and ones and a fourth and one. That is not something we're used to seeing from a Packers defense. 

Despite the penalties, inaccurate passing, drops, interceptions, fumbles, missed field goals, and minimal pass rush, the Packers came THIS CLOSE to completing an incredible comeback. I don't know about you, but that gives me some comfort that the talent is there on this team and they can make a Super Bowl run if they can just learn to stop beating themselves.

Go Pack Go

 

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

"Jersey Al" Bracco is the Editor-In-Chief, part owner and wearer of various hats for CheeseheadTV.com and PackersTalk.com. He's a lifetime Packers fan living in the land of the Giants (and Jets). Follow Al on twitter at @JerseyalGBP

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (100)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
T7Steve's picture

October 02, 2024 at 06:34 am

"they can make a Super Bowl run if they can just learn to stop beating themselves."

Kind of puts it in a nutshell for the players and coaches, AL, but it's the same for just about 32 teams.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:09 am

Every team does not have our talent and depth. I did not down vote you.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:21 am

I believe that, aside from the trenches, 90% of losses are created by making a team and their coaches make mistakes and taking advantage of them. It's all NFL talent after all.

If I didn't get downvotes I wouldn't know if anyone read my posts. HA! No problem PeteK.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:03 pm

I did

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:12 am

If that statement is stripped down to its core implication, it equates to stating that they could make the Super Bowl with better coaching.

0 points
0
0
mnbadger's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:42 am

Al's "statement" clearly and maybe purposefully didn't mention coaching.
IMO, MLF is in way over his head. Nice guy and a sharp offensive mind.
Is not able to manage a game:
Challenges.
Red zone.
Timeouts.
Clock management.
Short yardage.
Focus.
Bisaccia was supposed to mentor him. Either Rich B is doing a poor job or MLF is ignoring his insight.
Very hard to win a super bowl without a strong head coach.
Yes he's won many games.
How many were won in spight of him vs because of him?
GPG!

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:18 am

Badger - I agree. I think MLF is a very high level OC. When the game get's too busy for him, he loses focus and his offensive genius abandons him. He loses himself and is seemingly overtasked and not equipped to manage the game and call the right plays. His staff building skills are also questionable. I think his comfort zone is simply being an OC. All your points seem valid to me. He looks really good as a frontrunner HC though.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 02, 2024 at 01:28 pm

Crayz, I have been a strong proponent of a HC who is a HC for the entire team and is involved in all 3 phases...AKA John Harbaugh/Ravens, Campbell/lions, going back to Vince.

Then Luke Fickell arrived in Madison and gave me doubts anew...

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:36 am

I've said this all along. As an OC MLF is GREAT! Can anyone do that AND HC? Not a knock on MLF. but HC duties that you list here should probably be handled by someone else.

I have no idea how they split duties between Bisaccia, Stenavich, and MLF. Too much is on MLF's plate in key moments, which do not occur every game. Clock management coupled with coach's challenge decision while playcalling and player substitution are all simultaneously critical is just too much for MLF, and probably too much for any one person to excel at when it really counts.

While this was exposed, I wouldn't say it cost us the game this week. That was done in the first quarter.

0 points
0
0
Irish_Cheesehead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:51 am

Completely disagree. Look at some of the coaches around the NFL. Packers are very lucky to have MLF, but he can't execute the plays on the field.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:25 pm

Continuing the "to downvote or not to downvote theme" CW you came as close as I've ever come to downvoting someone with this post ( downvoting is not a personal policy of mine - if I disagree, it's with a response).

The ability for a team to dig themselves out of a 28-0 hole does not happen by chance - both offense and defense need to adjust....... and that's coaching.

This game was there to be won at 6:20 to go and 4 mins to go - The players let the coaches down here. I'll bet that Kraft's Pop Waner coach said "secure the ball" and Love's High school coach said "don't throw deep off of your back foot"

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:49 pm

By 28 to nothing in a quarter or so, the damage is done. That was drive after drive of rehashed failed Barry type D. Soft coverage and vanilla pressure, not stunts or complexity, let alone blitzes. Thats against the best WR in the league and a pretty darn good one who have torched better off defenders, including Jaire many times with those tactics and with a more easily rattled QB.

If pointing that out gets me a downvote, I will take it with pride. Hafley could have found very few ways to give up points against them faster and with such inevitability. Moreover, there is stacks of film on both the Vikings and Darnold that illustrate the folly, thanks in part to Barry. The fact that Barry did adapt and they couldn’t recover their groove just serves to illustrate the foolhardiness of his plan. That plan will bomb against Detroit too (and has), so he’d better be the fast learner he’s claimed to be or alternatively get over the temerity and show the heart he claimed to have.

No apologies. That could have been Barry, though it is probably fair to say that the same DL/DE/OLB players managed more penetration for Barry. The soft coverage still killed us when they didn’t get home, but it took longer. The D didn’t even truly stem the tide, that was STs: Whelan and Melton who finally got us moving. Only then did we gradually start playing to pressure the QB and the catch.

0 points
0
0
Tundraboy's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:54 pm

Hmm . I dunno. Shooting ourselves in the foot has been our own very special way of losing since 2014! Need to start playing smarter to exorcise that demon.

0 points
0
0
NickPerry's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:01 am

Love...We knew he'd be rusty against the Vikings. Up to that point Love had played one preseason series of 3 snaps and the week one game. I was actually surprised he got it going in the 2nd half after watching that first half. But he DID get it going. Whether you think that was because of the defense the Vikings played in the 2nd half or Love finding his groove, he played MUCH better than any point so far this season.

Listened to Wilde & Taushe and they brought up some interesting stats. Right now, according to PFF, Rashon Gary has a 3% win rate...THREE FRICKING PERCENT! That's just plain pathetic. Kenny Clark had been a no show for 4 games and Gary is just as invisible. I would rather live and die by the blitz than watch guys like Sam Darnold pick them apart when rushing 4. Opposing QB's have had an average of OVER 3 seconds to throw against the Packers. Watching Gary rush the passer is a joke. He lines up, smashes into the RT, and gets STONED every time!

The kicking situation is a nightmare. Narveson is a hack. I mean it's just painful to watch him perform. You would think a good ST Coordinator could help this kid correct this since EVERYTHING he misses is to the right. The Packers pay Rich Bisaccia a shit ton of money and for the most part the Packers have improved in certain areas on ST. But CLEARLY a kicking coach he is NOT!

I find this week 5 game a MUST WIN for the Packers. Going 2-3 isn't the end of the world though I think they'll beat the Rams. But IF they were to lose they'd be 0-3 against the NFC. That kind of start could go a LONG ways in determining a playoff spot.

LETS GO!!

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:17 am

Love will still have a little more rust, but they're playing a team that's a little hobbled and thankfully without Sam Darnold, so I think he'll start to click with the receivers getting more reps with him helping too.

I was going to put in a job application to the Packers' special teams, but my knee is swollen and hurting for some reason. Might be the weather. This kicking situation gives hope to even we oldsters over 65 of second income chances.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:07 pm

😂🤣😂🤣😂

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:43 am

Love should never have started this game.
I wrote why all week that he wouldn't be ready.
I wrote trade Gary. He's Done. And so is P.Smith.
The packers must change the LBs.
What was drafted for the inside. Must go outside.
I Blame Gute for the kicking situation.

0 points
0
0
jannes bjornson's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:05 am

Willis doesn't toss 4 TDs if he's in the backfield and LaFleur's run game would have been stymied just like with Love at the helm. When Watson went down, the air attack was compromised. Dropped passes cost the Pack two TDs. I say, stay with those who want to win and keep feeding Reed and Kraft. Wicks and Doubs have to tighten it up in the Focus & Fetch department. Concentration. Gary should be excelling in a 4-3 look and P Smith is a situational guy now. What would you get for Gary? Van Ness may show up in year 3-4? The kicking fiasco was covered since they reached on Carlson; big leg, slow windup guy. Joseph would have been paid more, so he went into tire-kicking mode.

0 points
0
0
crayzpackfan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:27 am

Jann - "LaFleur's run game would have been stymied just like with Love at the helm"

I don't think our run game was stymied, I think it was flat out abandoned and ruined with penalties. We were at or near 5 YPC while running.

0 points
0
0
JerseyAl's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:11 pm

Stock, you're not wrong in this case, but let's face it, you blame Gute for everything. Inflation, the weather, etc.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 01:18 pm

He’s not wrong on the kicker, as we all feared when Gute rolled the dice on Narveson at the last moment.

What would be interesting to know is why they waited all summer to jump ship when they did so after he won fairly clearly statistically. Who and what thinking drove that when we bypassed much more talented options earlier? Why don’t we have Carlson on the PS at least? The ones they were trying out look worse. Is it that someone doesn’t want him around for other reasons?

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:29 pm

So much of kicking is mental, maybe they didn't like how Carlson handled misses.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:55 pm

It could well be. I think there has to be some attitudinal thing. There comes a point, however, where that is dubious if the new guy misses more regularly, despite handling it well. We are at that point of pretty darn close. Right now, Rookie Carlson was better at this point last year.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 02, 2024 at 06:51 pm

CW - 10 thumbs up

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:30 pm

Guess I should have read the replies before responding to Mr Gloomy.

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 02, 2024 at 06:47 pm

Thats because shit rolls downhill.
Give me Ron Wolf any day.
I've always stated for the Glory of Gute.
But I just don't see eye to eye on his drafts.
Or his revolving door. !!
I'll admit I'm wrong if he can win a super-Bowl.
But my fear is when Murphy leaves.
The checks and Balances won't keep us competitive
anymore.
So we will suck.
Propaganda only goes so far.
And so does persuasive thinking.
But as a stockholder- I vote No confidence.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:25 pm

You blame Gutey for the sun coming up in the morning.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:56 pm

Save yourself for the “everything is rosy” crew.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:06 am

Nick, I screamed against the Gary pick. Being a big M fan I heard the hype and expected big things and he was a flop at M taking into consideration he was suppised to the coming.
Ya he also had the habit of missing the big games.
Pre draft he reminded me of Perry who was from Mich went to usc. Both go missing in big games against good teams. Both little nagging injuries. Both shined only against weaker o lines. Both should have heen round 2 or early 3 picks.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:12 am

Pack is trying out 3 kickers as we speak, can't get much worse.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:04 am

"It can always get worse" - Ramsay Bolton

Life of Brian, anyone? 🎶 Always look on the bright side of life 🎶

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 05:08 pm

“ Forget about your sin
Give the audience a grin
Enjoy it, it's your last chance anyhow”

Or maybe not your last chance yet Mr Narveson.

0 points
0
0
bjkdad44's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:06 pm

I Agree… I agree… I agree!… 100%!

0 points
0
0
stockholder's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:25 am

The Team chemistry changed.
The packers staff is back to hope.
I would not be surprised to see MLF
seat get hot.
The injuries are reminiscent of
a promising season gone bad.
The mistakes replaced progress.
And MLF knows it.
The comfort level is gone -

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:18 am

Hey, Chicken Little it's only 4 games into the season. Sure we're playing some sloppy mistake filled games, but there are plenty of positive signs .

0 points
0
0
Untylu1968's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:20 am

A nice four game win streak will send him back in hiding for a while!

0 points
0
0
Irish_Cheesehead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:52 am

It's week four. Do you always overreact?

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:05 am

Perennially, yes.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:32 pm

Matches your comfort level with English.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:31 am

I hated those instant replay overturns because I didn't think there was clear evidence. That was the original standard for overturning plays. Now they just make their best guess, regardless of how the play was called on the field. But the one that they clearly screwed up worked in our favor. Xavier McKinney was juggling the ball when he went out of bounds on that interception. I have no idea how the replay officials failed to notice that.

I was also surprised the Packers elected to kick off to start the game. Considering that they've been doing the opposite for awhile now, I thought it showed a lack of confidence in Jordan Love and the offense. Which turned out to be justified, although unfortunately the defense was no better.

The announcers had me so screwed up on that muffed punt that when the Packers ran their play from the one-yard-line, I thought it was a two-point conversion attempt. I know that a muffed punt can't be advanced, but it all happened so fast, and the TV broadcast indicated it was a touchdown. They had me fooled on the Matt LaFleur outburst as well. I didn't find out what he was really mad about until I read his comments after the game.

The second half comeback was better than if they had just folded (which should never happen anyway), but I was not terribly impressed by it. The Vikings had a big lead and let up. We've seen the Packers do the same thing many times over the years. And it said a lot that when the Packers got within six points, it took the Vikings only a few plays to easily get within field goal range.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:15 am

I thought that the Doubs and Wicks ones were catches. I still do as the ball doesn’t touch the ground. The NFL really needs to address this. No rule is perfect but one this opaque is no rule at all.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:08 am

After the first quarter GB never had a chance to actually win, so you can't really call it a comeback; agreed.

Announcing was terrible, but it could be argued that the officiating was worse. We need to make a blind ref our mascot!

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:36 am

Try out Brandon McManus as kicker, NFL dropped his case. He is a 82% lifetime kicker and is 33 years old. Maybe a good stop gap! Just a thought seeing the 2 guys they tried out yesterday sounds like chopped meat.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:48 am

Try him out and see how much he wants

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:20 am

NFL disciplinary action could restart at any point if any additional relevant information emerges. Unless he settles, he’s still being actively sued after a delay for refiling for procedural reasons. Both could mean he’s suddenly suspended by league or team. Even if the Packers would touch him, there’s no guarantee of future availability.

0 points
0
0
PeteK's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:21 am

And put a male baby sitter next to him on plane rides. LOL

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:41 am

Well DeShaun Watson is still playing.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:51 am

He was not for a while and he may not be soon, either through poor play or a new round of behavior if the new allegations of behavior after joining the Browns have any credibility.

0 points
0
0
Packers0808's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:39 pm

True for sure, but was back and allowed to play!

0 points
0
0
Packer_Fan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:43 am

Al, you pretty much laid it all out. Love was a bit rusty in the first half and better in the second half. But he has a tendency to be too aggressive when trying to catch up late in a game. Gotta do better.

I thought a few things happened in the beginning of the game which had a big impact on the game. I didn't hear the full decision, but Lafluer chose to defer to receive the second half kickoff. Just seems to me that they do better when they take the ball first. Second, on the first third and 14 where Jefferson made the firstdown, Hafley should had used max pressure to force a fourth down. Then Wicks dropping the third down pass to force a missed field goal. Any one or all three of these things change, the game outcome may have been different.

Finally, they gotta get Kraft to hold on to the ball. Have a drill of defense players trying to knock the ball out.

This team is talented. But it is still going through growing pains. And we will see games like this. But they will win their share.

0 points
0
0
T7Steve's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:08 am

I believe it's up to the O-line to get established with the running game and MLF to call the comfortable pass plays off of that to help Love knock the rest of his rust off. Of course, if they let the Rams and Stafford get a lead, all bets are off. Could come down to a walk off field goal attempt. HA!

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:18 am

#85 had a torn pec surgically repaired and now has a messed up shoulder. Our C has had a bad shoulder for nearly all of our last 10 games, at least. I don't think either one is going to be 100% until next season at best.

The sheer number of other injured players keeps growing, and even if they're able to play it doesn't mean they're going to be at their best. I think expectations for the season have to be adjusted.

0 points
0
0
Cheezehead72's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:46 am

I wil never blame poor officiating for a loss. Poor officiating is part of the game. Championship teams overcome bad calls. Now I will say that the crew on Sunday was really bad. They missed call, called non existent penalties, and the replay was wrong. Yes Wicks caught the ball but Xavier McKinney's INT was not an INT. I will forgive the officials from making bad calls because of the speed of the game and they are human. But for a sideline official not to look at the coach after a play in a timeout situation is inexcusable. Also for the replay to make those mistakes is also inexcusable. Get it right or get rid of it.

I do not understand why they opted for the drop kick on the onside kick. To me kicking off the tee is better as the ball is stationary. I hope one of you people with more knowledge can tell us.

This is what happens when you try to save money on a kicker. Kicking is very important so you need to have a good one. I say we try Hale for a couple weeks. If he is not any good lets go after Joseph if the Giants release him in a couple weeks.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:15 am

Not sure why the GB approach to getting a kicker was the money saving approach.
No argument that it’s been abysmal, but I don’t see the money saving part of the equation.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:23 am

There were higher cost kickers with a much better record available when we signed Joseph. I am not sure that they would have come, unless we cut bait with Carlson, but there is no evidence that Gute tried. I think that’s the reference and, given that Carlson won by all visible measures and we still cut him, that criticism does seem a little more valid in hindsight.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:44 am

Hale is not an option this season, PS only.

Popular opinion is to bring Anders Carlson back. Not that I'm saying that's the best option, it just came out.

I agree that the especially terrible officiating did not cost us this game, GB did that without help. Although right now the queens are playing well.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 01:28 pm

International pathway players can now be elevated just like any other PS player after rule changes this summer. Before they were just non-playing trainees. So yes, in theory Hales could be elevated or even promoted to the roster. I’m not sure he was or is close to ready, however.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:12 pm

CW is right about Hale.

0 points
0
0
Major Snafu's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:23 am

My take in all this and I could be wrong but I think the Pack are an above avg team and thats all. This was not a close game. The Vikes would have done whatever to point more points on the board if they had to. They were coasting the second half. I think they were trying new plays and just experimenting knowing the game was over at the half for them.

1. The Vikes pass d fought our defenders for the ball all game. They rushed to the ball and met the receivers and made tackles at the spot of contact. I saw at times Vikes receivers wide open with no packer around them and Darnold missed them or it would have been a much worse outcome then it was.

2. I saw a pass rush using stunts and techniques to get to the passer, not just some straight forward bull rush like the Packers think they can do but cant.

3. I saw closing speed and coverage speed by the Vikes linebackers, one getting and interception 20 yards downfield running backwards. Our linebackers have no ability to do this, they lack vertical speed as well.

4. I saw a QB having the time to accurately place the ball where the receivers could catch it without regards for being hurried.

5. I saw a kicker actually kick a field goal without any issues.

6. I saw receivers running slants leaving the corner eat dust and looking foolish.

7. I saw a 4 man pass rush accomplish nothing and get beaten down by an O line that protected their guy.

8. I saw a rb get almost 100 yards and score a TD and ours work to eck out 40 yards.

No this was a beat down. Any team that can protect the QB and have decent receivers with speed can dominate the packers but then the pack doesnt care about d its just put up more points on O and that doesnt win SB

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:02 am

Our RBs were largely bystanders in terms of rush attempts. I saw a team essentially gifted 28 points by a naive strategy from Hafley that clearly failed to understand our past with these players and theirs and their key strengths. I saw a DC who, faced with a challenge, displayed the very same timidity on all levels that has got us burned against very good receivers and a QB given acres of space and time.

The only good thing was that Hafley showed he can adjust, but, in doing so, only highlighted what he could and should have done. If he’d gone further we might not have needed the 3 points at the end. It’s a shame he didn’t spend more time watching previous match ups and seeing that Ballentine and Stokes do best draped over their man. Playing Nixon outside over Ballentine and Rochell was just asking for it in terms of athleticism and instincts.

He is far too high on Nixon in general. Nixon does, and did, do some things well, but he is not better than either Ballentine or Rochell outside and particularly not against those athletic receivers. Layering a vanilla rush over that was just asking for what it got. Drive after drive of scores in double quick time. One of the worst defensive coordinator plans I’ve seen.

Darnold dissolving as soon as he had pressure was not a surprise either. It reminded me of Cousins under Barry. The maddening thing is that if Hadley didn’t know this, LaFleur certainly should have. Maybe it’s best to pool knowledge and vet coordinator plans like any leader ordinarily would. LaFleur is a facilitator not a HC. His learning curve is incredibly flat outside of play design and scripting.

0 points
0
0
Gee's picture

October 02, 2024 at 07:18 pm

Maybe the loss of Alexander, played too much into Hafley game plan at the beginning. Still cannot believe the lack of pressure from the front 4. As you said it was so vanilla, like how many stunts or sifting were even done. If I'm Hafley I keep this tape, just remind myself from time to time, not over think, and remember what he said, in the preseason. Attack attack and press coverage.

0 points
0
0
LLCHESTY's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:36 pm

How about taking your purple love home to a Vikings site. You can come back in December.

0 points
0
0
MTmind's picture

October 03, 2024 at 09:27 am

You’re attempting to define the team based on one outcome. I would assume you felt the same way when the Vikings beat the Packers 24 - 10 last year. Which team had a better record and more promise when the playoffs began?

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:33 am

Sam Darnold -
"The fact that the Packers could not make him even slightly uncomfortable in the pocket in the first half was like handing them 28 points, and that's just what they did."
This has been the most disappointing part of the team so far. The lack of a consistent pass rush from the front 4. This camp/preseason Gary looked unblockable. What happened to that?

Jordan Love -
While Love was erratic and looked very rusty, Love started to find it in the 2nd half. He started hitting downfield more. He made a bad decision on the last INT. Other then that his decisions were pretty good overall. I saw a lot of fans saying he should have been taken out in the 2nd half. To me unless he was in danger of getting hurt, I didn't like that. I liked seeing him work through the rust and his injury and hopefully this week we see the better version of Love.

The challenges and reviews were so one-sided -
Legit the only call I think they got right of the 4 reviews was the last Jefferson catch. The other 3 were all wrong. 2 hurt GB and 1 benefitted them. The first catch overturned to me was the worst call overall. They overturned the call on the field when there was not 100% with out a doubt evidence to over turn it. The next Wicks one to me should have been overturned because it was pretty damn clear his hands were under the ball.

Place kickers around the NFL are doing amazing things -
I am going to keep asking this question until i get a good answer for it. How is the operation of kicking? The snap to hold to kick? I really question when I see the inconsistencies by multiple kickers that they had. Also I ask because Narveson was almost perfect in the preseason. And then Joseph just went 5-5. We know the snapping was not good last year. And I question how good it is this year. The process maybe the bigger concern then who the kicker is?

"Despite the penalties, inaccurate passing, drops, interceptions, fumbles, missed field goals, and minimal pass rush, the Packers came THIS CLOSE to completing an incredible comeback. I don't know about you, but that gives me some comfort that the talent is there on this team and they can make a Super Bowl run if they can just learn to stop beating themselves."
They were down 28-0, and came within 6 points with 10 minutes left in the game. They possessed the ball 3 more times and had 2 turnovers. If they don't turn it over either of those times they have a realistic chance of winning. Just the fact that they played as poorly as they did, and still had a chance to win shows that this team is willing to fight. Also should scare a lot of teams that they can play as poorly as they did, and yet can comeback.

0 points
0
0
Thegreatreynoldo's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:33 pm

Early on Gary was unstoppable. Then again, Tom was out so he was going up against Telfort, Dillard, and Tenuta.

When Tom returned, we heard nothing more from Gary. I made that clear about Gary in the practice roundups, and what I wrote about LVN (only gets hustle sacks and does not even practice against the number ones - i.e. Rasheed Walker) is also coming to pass during the regular season. We heard precious little from Preston, either.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:41 am

We're 2-2. The Lions appear to be for real. I expect the Vikings ship to take on water and sink slowly. It's a long season and I expect improvement in Green Bay.

As far as the broadcast, the visuals are even worse than the announcing. It gets more and more challenging to focus on the action on the field with all the cutaway shots. I'd like fewer looks up Hafley's nostrils and LaFleur with a play sheet in front of his mug and more, you know, football. I understand it's reality TV and not going to change for the better.

Heading out in the yard to yell at clouds.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:06 am

I’d like less zebra shots. A lot less. Then we might get more football. Around the league the officiating might actually be worse than ever and more intrusive than ever too. That’s something of an achievement.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:45 am

That’s what I’ve been saying. The refs are becoming the focal point.
I was torched in a previous post for calling out the officiating. It seems Al agrees with me, and now, many others too; the officials were bad.
And in this case, there were more lousy calls against the Packers than the Vikings.

0 points
0
0
barutanseijin's picture

October 02, 2024 at 02:26 pm

It really does seem the league is trying to make the officiating more of a part of the broadcasts.

— Love to Reed! Touchdown! …or was it? We’ll be back to see what the officials say after this commercial break!

Plus all the ex-refs working TV blathering about rules and replays . Enough already. It’s obvious the NFL doesn’t care about the quality of the decisions. in fact, it almost seems that they prefer bad/dumb officiating because it keeps people talking about the games.

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:37 am

Agreed. It's to the point where after any pawsative play with excellent pad level, my beady eyes scan around sports betting ads, score updates, time, temperature, wind speed and upcoming game promos on my tee vee screen in hopes the yellow FLAG graphic will not appear. Kinda ruins the flow, ya know?

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

October 02, 2024 at 08:43 am

I, Pantz Burp and my ranDUMB thoughts;

I think we agreed to play in South America to secure our hosting of the 2025 Draft.

Constructing underground parking at Lambeau Field gave #8 from the Jets his idea for his darkness retreat.

Yes, #10 is dealing with an injury. The start of last year too, his passes seemed lumpy without much zip to them. Not sure why just my observations then and now. I like Love mucho and the same for #2. Keep #2 around and on our roster

If Coach LaF wasn't pissed at the referee not calling a time out, I would have been pissed at Coach LaF.

With all that went wrong for the Pack...almost unbelievable they had a chance to win. This will be the game that we look back on as a pivotal moment to our future success.

Make Whelan our kicker as well as our punter. (Keep some kicker on the roster for game day but give them a Rubics cube and tell them to go over there on the bench).

Win # 801 is coming. I need to look up if we have the most loses in history as well?

If Chicago is where QBs go to die...are the Packers where ST coaches go to die? I like that lil Italian dude but this is a business. (along with entertainment)

Sophia Loren or Raquel Welch? I think both would look quite handsome in their Hardware Hank gloves and give it their all while performing the Beer Barrel Polka.

Just like the Patriots vs Seahawks Superbowl, I am sad that one team will win and happy that one of them will lose in the Vikings vs Jets tilt.

We should que up that Bobby Uecker quote from Major League after a missed FG. "Just a bit outside". This will restore much needed levity at a time where it is needed.

I think using hankies are being polite but must be washed after a week's worth of use.

Man, I miss those Jack Palance one-handers. Sorry, I digress...

Yours, until the cows come home,,

lil half-pint pantz

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:55 am

I've wondered about saving a roster spot by having the same person punt and kick, for a long time. I don't know if Whelan can do it, but I think it's a good idea to try. In practice.

0 points
0
0
pantz_bURp's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:03 pm

Hey Sic,

The real kicker, is....what is Whelan gets hurt in-game. Who do you turn to in an emergency (kicker, punter, kickoffer).

>^••^<

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:15 am

My concerns:

-Coaching choices (How was a non-kicker chosen to rescue a failing ST unit?)

-Defensive Draft choices--where are the drafted elite players on Defense? Packers (Gute) have invested significant Draft Capital (repeatedly)
on 1st round picks who are mediocre @ best--This is a wasteful approach, it depletes resources for other important positions and forces the Offense to carry the team.

-Lack of accountability for above-mentioned failures.

-Gute's repeated poor Defensive Draft choices--
-Subpar coaches not fired in a timely manner (Barry, Bisaccia),
--Poor player choices remain too long

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:37 am

ST is about a lot more than a kicker, even this year, and so were our ST issues. Thus far, aside from kicking, STs has been pretty positive. I don’t get the impression it’s Bisaccia clinging go Narveson. It’s LaFleur who seems to really like Nareveson’s mindset or Gute not pulling the trigger.

If I had to guess, it was LaFleur who wanted to move on from Carlson. If Bissacia had, or Gute, I think he’d have gone much earlier. Right now, that’s not looking as good and was probably 5 months too late if we were going to really have competition worth the name.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:32 am

I sure get tired of coming here to read that our coaches and players aren't very good. It's nonsense.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:34 am

You may need to find another venue

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

October 03, 2024 at 05:00 pm

We’d like you to.

0 points
0
0
HarryHodag's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:40 am

Amen, brother. The current staff is far above average. A different kicker and the outcome of two games might have been different. This is a talented team.

It's mid-week and lets move on to the Rams game. That is a critical game if the Packers hope to have a hand in the playoffs.

0 points
0
0
Starrbrite's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:47 am

I Agree with LH and Harry.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:18 pm

I think injuries have to adjust our expectations for the season, there are 12 this week up from 11 last week. And all but two are contributing players, with most being starters.

At the beginning of the season I saw 14-3, but that didn't account for GB beating themselves with stupid mistakes. That's a wild card I don't know how to predict?

Even so I agree that this week is a winnable game. Before the bye they should also beat the Cardinals and Jaguars. Losing to Houston and Detroit would not be surprising. 5-4 is not something I'm excited about even though it'd be better than last season, despite the harder schedule.

After the bye I can see losing 4 more, for 9-8. Meh. Maybe they beat both Seattle and the Saints? 10-7. Not sure anybody comes back from injury to 100% during the season, but of course I hope JL10 plays well anyway. I think our best hope is that none of our big guys (including Tucker Kraft) get injured more seriously due to playing injured.

GB doesn't deserve a reputation for being conservative with injured players since they play them and let depth sit.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 09:42 am

It was not on Sunday and your own scribblings describe the symptoms as well as any other, if without linking a cause to the effect.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:54 am

I know, Coldworld. You think the cause is incompetency at the top, especially LaFleur. Nothing is going to change your mind.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:06 am

I think, and clearly stated, that I saw the problem on Sunday as being Hafley’s tactical plan. By the time he learned, the horses had not only bolted but left the state.

I do think the degree of ineptitude in the plan he went in with asks questions about how these plans are reviewed, if at all, but I otherwise made no particular statement about LaFleur. Al brought up the decision to defer. I only commented that the running game was effectively neutered by the lightning defensive implosion. Reading is better than assuming.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:07 pm

"....degree of ineptitude of the plan""''

What would be a good plan to have that includes you winning when you turn the ball over 4 times? And missing two FGs, and failing on 4th down twice. What would a competent DC (not Hafley or Barry) do? How do you plan to contain Jefferson and Addison with your starting CBs out? And still contain Jones?

??

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 05:12 pm

If you are going to defend Hafley by reciting a litany of other errors or failings, understand that that neither works to alleviate the lightning fast surrender of TDs nor enhances your claim that the offensive coaching was above scrutiny either. Perhaps I was overlooking these things in light of the black hole of neo-Barry tactics and results.

0 points
0
0
cdoemel's picture

October 03, 2024 at 05:03 pm

It’s the NFL. It’s a violent sport. Every team has injuries every week. And we know Green Bay is conservative with injuries. Early in the week they always load up the injury report. Most of it’s just precaution and rest. But the Chicken Little act here is not surprising. It happens every week every year.

0 points
0
0
TXCHEESE's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:33 am

Agreed. GB is the youngest, yet one of the most talented teams in the league right now. There are probably many fans that wish their team sucked as bad as ours. I wonder how many of those on this thread, with the negative comments, were espousing the greatness of MLF the previous two weeks.

Folks, GB has a good team. They had a bad half, due to a poor job by the kicker, and a really rusty QB, against a pretty good team, and yet still made a game of it at the end. Love knocked off a big chunk of the rust, and I think this team learned to keep grinding. Their response in the 2nd half, albeit with some dumb mistakes, was heartening to see. I believe they will come out hard and fast in L.A.

0 points
0
0
SicSemperTyrannis's picture

October 02, 2024 at 12:23 pm

A fast start would be a refreshing change of pace! JL10 even did that in a game or two last season, so I know he's capable of it. This has been a weakness.

GB should be able to beat the Rams even if they take a while to get going, but hopefully they give themselves every advantage and moidalize da bums.

GPG!

0 points
0
0
RCPackerFan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 10:44 am

The only coaching that I question right now is our Special Teams.

I want to know how Narveson was almost perfect this preseason before coming here, and how Joseph just went 5-5 away from here. But when Joseph, Carlson, the others, and now Narveson all are here they're inaccurate. Maybe its not truly the kicker? Maybe there is something in the operation going on.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:21 am

Sample size. Joseph is statistically within the range one would expect based on the last 6 years. Hes 5 of 6, so 83%. If he misses his next kick he’s down to 71%. There is no statistically meaningful deviation from his conversion rate thus summer or career to date, just oscillation inherent in a small sample size.

Narveson was 6 of 7 in camp, 85%, but another small sample. If he’s now 9/13 or 69%. The difference is 2 missed kicks. One could speculate that the pressure is higher, but the reality is that his sample size is so small, as my comment on Joseph if he misses another kick illustrates, to render the value of either rate as a true indicia virtually nil.

If the process (LS and holder) is at fault, then those would have affected Carlson too. That would only suggest that we were wrong to dump him, or less justified. It wouldn’t suggest that Narveson is comparatively better, or Joseph, since Carlson beat him over a seasons worth of kicks. Carlson still was below league average in doing so of course.

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 04:03 pm

It's the nature of the beast, RC. Even if, by some miracle, you had an exceptional Special Teams coach, he'd be offered a promotion and he'd be gone. You're always going to be coaching a bunch of young men who do damn fool things, like Bostick did.

You are ALWAYS going to get hurt by your special teams. You hope it doesn't cost you games, but sometimes it does. We missed two FGs, but we also recovered a muffed punt on the 4, so that SHOULD balance out a little..

It is possible to win games without a FG kicker. We should think about trying it.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:05 am

Excellent football teams play complementary football.

- 2/3 of Defense is subpar= D-line, 2/3 cornerback room, middle line backers
-Offense cannot rely on kicker-will need to play too many 4th downs.

Too much emphasis (once again) is being placed on the QB/receivers.

0 points
0
0
NFLfan's picture

October 02, 2024 at 11:50 am

Games are won in the trenches. Our o-line is doing their part. Our D-line is not-that is a 50% drain on the team.
When I look at well-paid, competent edge rushers, I think Bosa, Maxx Crosby, TJ Watt, Myles Garrett. If any of them performed at the the level that very well-paid, 26 y/o Rashan Gary performs, they would be fired. The rest of our D-line is also subpar, either not talented enough or??-LVN is another questionable draft pick, the one who was supposed to take over for Clark or Smith
. This poor performance precedes the hiring of Haffley. No one is preventing Rashan from pressuring more than 4-5 x/yr or sacking more than 2 x a year. Q Walker is a another bust and dragging down the team.
Haffley inherited a weak cornerback room as well. Stokes cannot tackle nor can he keep up with star shifty receivers. He runs in one direction. Nixon has heart but he is not a cornerback. Jaire is talented but mercurial and oft-injured.
The Safety room looks great but that is not enough to make up for a poor showing by the others.

I still think this is more about Gute's inability to assess quality D players in the Draft. There are just too many first round pick D failures.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

October 02, 2024 at 06:05 pm

Not sure if Rashan Gary had some sort of "stockholm syndrome" softness for Aaron Jones, but there was at least one play where Jones applied a chip block to Gary then released out to the seam (to catch the ball).

I'd expect a 260lb DE to pancake a 195lb RB who dares try and chip him.

I'm nowhere near the "Gary is a bust" band-wagon. Possibly Hafley needs to dial up some stunt packages for him and shift him around the line a bit? Maybe he's being tasked to set the edge every play.... and he's both getting predictable and being easily neutralized because of it?

FMI, has anyone ever seen Gary do a spin move? Not that I want to see him try and be the second coming of Dwight Feeney, but he tends to pick his path (outside or in) and not adapt.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

October 02, 2024 at 01:41 pm

I agree Al!

At home, your QB needing to shake off some rust and get some action, win the toss...and kick off??

Chance to get the lead and put pressure on the visiting foe as best case...worst case you go three and out and let Whelan boom a rocket and let the crowd boom some more.

Instead the worst happened. SMH. I don't understand Matt's decision making at times. The Packers had the opening possession vs Eagles, Colts and Titans.

Drive vs Eagles stalled but Whelan dropped the punt on the 10. Eagles then threw an INT to X.

Drive vs Colts ended in a FG.

Drive vs Titans ended in a TD.

Why be afraid to take the ball, at home, in a quiet stadium of fans watching your work?

0 points
0
0
Leatherhead's picture

October 02, 2024 at 03:55 pm

Here is the counter-argument, for getting the ball to start the second half.

You will start the second half behind, tied, or ahead. If you're behind, you get the ball and first chance in what is now a 30 minute game. If you're tied you can take the lead, and if you're ahead you can put them in a deeper hole.

IMO, that advantage in a 30 minute game is better than the first possession in a 60 minute game.

XXXX

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

October 02, 2024 at 05:19 pm

Depends on who you are playing and your tactics for the game. As a majority rule I’d agree, but in this case I was surprised. As you set writing before the game, the key here was to get ahead and to make them play catch up. It wouldn’t have lasted with the D Hafley called, but it did mildly surprise that LaFleur deferred. He’s been willing to take the ball first in similar scenarios in the past.

0 points
0
0
JerseyAl's picture

October 03, 2024 at 12:35 pm

I also normally prefer to defer, but with how the Vikings have been getting off to fast starts I would have tried to flip the script on them

0 points
0
0
Dragon5's picture

October 02, 2024 at 02:29 pm

AL,

Great laughs on the kicking segment; truer words could not be spoken. My eldest son has had a gift of crushing ⚽balls since 3rd grade, is PK / P for JV2 high school. Anticipating he makes varsity as a sophmore next year and his first Kohl's event beckons. A dad can dream.

Excellent ❗ on the 2nd half defense...insinuating, YES a DC that can make adjustments!👍

Outside of PK, I think the biggest cloud hanging over 1265 through 4 weeks is the incompetence of our seasoned Bulldogs. I was not a fan of Stokes, Walker, or Wyatt picks, with Bullard the exception as his tape did stand out and gets a pass as a rook.

0 points
0
0