5 Takeaways From Colts 10-16 Packers: Matt LaFleur Is Awesome

Matt LaFleur pushed all the right buttons as the Packers outlasted the Colts without starting quarterback Jordan Love.

The Packers are in the win column after a 16-10 triumph over the Indianapolis Colts at Lambeau Field, making it twelve straight wins in home openers for the green and gold.

Here are the five biggest takeaways from Green Bay’s first win of the 2024 season.

Matt LaFleur is awesome

With backup quarterback Malik Willis having been acquired less than three weeks ago, the onus was on Matt LaFleur to craft a functional offense this week, and the effectiveness of said offense was always going to say more about the head coach than the QB.

Well, LaFleur created and called a great game plan on Sunday. Despite everyone in the stadium knowing the Packers wanted to run the ball, they were able to get whatever they wanted on the ground in the first half, racking up 164 rushing yards in the first quarter (!).

Green Bay also won the time of possession battle by 20 minutes, and this helped them to build a lead they would never relinquish, even as Indy slowed them down somewhat in the second half.

Part of what made the Packers so successful on the ground was the creative play calling of LaFleur, who kept the Colts defense off balance with motion, fakes and sweeps.

It was a rushing performance so dominant, it makes you wonder why they do not do it all the time, but the Colts porous run defense played a part as well.

This is not the first time LaFleur has overcome the odds to steer his team to a win.

Back in 2021, the Packers went to Arizona to face the undefeated Cardinals, while missing their top three receivers, Davante Adams, Allen Lazard and Marquez Valdes-Scantling, and still managed to put up 24 points en route to a 24-21 victory.

LaFleur is a terrific coach and a top tier play caller, and Sunday provided yet more evidence of his brilliance.

Jeff Hafley’s defense shows its teeth

Following an up and down debut as an NFL defensive coordinator, Jeff Hafley’s unit came to play on Sunday, forcing the much ballyhooed Colts quarterback Anthony Richardson into three interceptions, bringing their total through two games to five picks and six total turnovers.

Having mostly contained Jalen Hurts’ running threat in week one, the Packers defense did the same to Richardson, limiting his opportunities to make explosive plays either on the ground or through the air, while also accentuating and capitalizing upon his inconsistent accuracy.

The Packers rushed the quarterback with discipline and care. Former first round pick Devonte Wyatt looks reborn in Hafley’s attacking defense, and was a menace all afternoon, registering the only sack.

Eric Wilson has risen from mostly a special teams player to a real defensive asset. He had a pick of Richardson and is turning into a reliable player at the linebacker position.

A lack of ability to play complementary football killed the Packers versus the Eagles. Sunday was the polar opposite in that regard. The only reason Green Bay’s offense could play the way they wanted to was due to the defense holding up their end of the bargain, and then some.

Hafley’s defense allowed just three points in the first 58 minutes, and made a statement that this time, it could actually be a new defensive dawn in Green Bay.

Malik Willis gets it done

Not enough can be said about how impressive Malik Willis’ performance was on Sunday. Less than three weeks after joining the team, he looked a changed player from the three starts he had for Tennessee as a rookie.

It is a testament to LaFleur’s coaching, but also Willis’ work ethic and even keeled demeanor, that he was able to cleanly operate the offense after so little time with the team.

Willis did exactly what the Packers needed. He protected the ball and did not take unnecessary risks, but still made plays when he had to, keeping the chains moving. He ended the day with his first NFL touchdown and 100-yard passing game.

The former Liberty quarterback had talent coming out of college, but was nowhere near ready to play at the highest level. Now with two years of experience behind him, and a strong offensive play caller to support him, he has already shown he can be serviceable.

With more time in the building and more exposure to the playbook, how good can Willis become in the next few weeks if Love is still out?

Strong start for Josh Jacobs continues

Jacobs’ short career in Green Bay so far has not been flashy.

In week one, he struggled to get anything going in the first half, due in large part to Green Bay’s offensive line failing to open holes. He has still not scored a touchdown yet, and on Sunday, fumbled his first opportunity to find the end zone at the half-yard line.

But after two games, he has 235 rushing yards on 48 carries, averaging 4.9 yards per tote. That yards per rush matches his average from 2022, when Jacobs led the NFL in rushing.

It is no secret the Packers wanted Aaron Jones to stay, but after that did not materialize, there is a reason they were then content to pivot and pay Jacobs a heap of money.

He is capable of doing something Jacobs never did; serve as a true workhorse back, shouldering the majority of the load week in and week out. After 32 carries on Sunday, Jacobs told reporters he felt like he could “play another half”.

The touchdowns will come, but Jacobs has already shown why the Packers inked him to a long-term contract on the first day of free agency.

Packers still not secure at kicker

Brayden Narveson’s two NFL games have been almost identical. Versus both the Eagles and Colts, the Packers’ new kicker went three of four, looking assured on the three makes, before missing an important 45-yarder.

Last weekend in Brazil, Narveson’s miss was crucial in a one-score loss, and he was fortunate not to have cost the Packers again this week.

Had he punched his final kick through the uprights on Sunday, it would have given Green Bay an unassailable, 17-point lead.

Instead, his miss meant they had to sweat out the final minutes as the Colts pulled within 6, attempted an onside kick, and then still had the chance to pull off an improbable late touchdown drive, which ultimately came up short.

Narveson seems like a stronger option than the Packers’ previous two kickers, but he needs to start making kicks under 50 yards routinely. Brian Gutekunst will probably still have an eye on the free agent kicker market at this point.

 

PLEASE SUBSCRIBE TO OUR CHEESEHEAD NATION WEEKLY NEWSLETTER HERE.

__________________________

Mark Oldacres is a sports writer from Birmingham, England and a Green Bay Packers fan. You can follow him on twitter at @MarkOldacres

__________________________

0 points
 

Comments (54)

Fan-Friendly This filter will hide comments which have ratio of 5 to 1 down-vote to up-vote.
albert999's picture

September 16, 2024 at 11:00 am

I don’t believe lafleur is a great play caller. Many times he falls back into conservative crap when he could put games away.
He had no creative plan after colts made obvious adjustments at half for our run game. His up the middle calls in. Razing were down right ignorant.
Hafley is getting gashed with the run game of opponents and can’t figure it out

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 16, 2024 at 03:39 pm

Don't be too hard on Hafley; with about 4 mins left in the game, IND had scored a total of 3 points. I'll take that from any DC. Without the missed FG and goal line fumble, this game would have been out of reach.

I don't care if Taylor ran all over the field. It didn't do that much for IND. He didn't score. With a dynamic back like that and the Colts just having scored 27 points last week against HOU, this was a good defensive outing. Plus, 3 picks and a forced fumble.

LaFleur HAD to be conservative as a playcaller in this game. His backup had only been with the team about 3 weeks and doesn't have the playbook down or the same skillset as the starter. This was a very well called game by MLF marred by a missed FG and fumble at the goal line.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

September 17, 2024 at 02:57 pm

I'm not supporting Al9 here, but Taylor's good work on plays got undone by his receiver's regular sloppy work. Wrong routes, slips, dropped catches. A well drilled team won't gift that many mistakes........... and yes, the 10 points that GB left out there absolutely mattered too.

0 points
0
0
LambeauPlain's picture

September 16, 2024 at 05:54 pm

The first quarter was a thing of beauty by Matt. Obviously, he did not game plan for penalties. Walker and others miscues prevented the first 15 minutes from becoming a route.

Great calls and plays. Even the in the second. Second half was Matt resorting to his tendency to play not to loose after a lead, but the Coach drew up a great plan for his back up QB, a very disciplined, cool customer. Willis executed the plan to perfection.

Willis is a talented young man...and smart...disciplined. I believe he and Love will make a good team.

Packers bench is in front me in Lambeau...it was fun to see Love on the bench with Willis after every series, talking to him.

0 points
0
0
Mister Chievous's picture

September 16, 2024 at 06:29 pm

would you please bequeath your season tickets unto me when you die?

0 points
0
0
Matt's picture

September 16, 2024 at 11:03 am

Some people say - new coach, same defense. Others say the difference is visible. I still need more tape. Eagles game was an opener, long trip and unusual surface so hard to judge. Colts game was much better but Barry held Seahawks scoreless, so what? I am not the one repeating "stop the run" mantra but after this game I do it. Taylor average was 8.6 and they benched him for unknown reason for a long part of the game. Richardson avg 9.3 and he had 1 or 2 designed run. They didn't play to their strenghts and tried hero balls instead. Good for us but it not often happens in the NFL.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 16, 2024 at 03:41 pm

What about the score? What about holding them to 3 points until there were just a few minutes left in the game and containing Richardson, a running threat himself?

Taylor ran all over, but how did that hurt GB?

0 points
0
0
Matt's picture

September 17, 2024 at 12:55 am

How about the score - I am very happy about it.
Why Taylor didn't hurt us more? Couldn't do it sitting on the bench.
My point is - I am very glad that we won, especally with backup QB. But I am not going to colour it more than this win needs to. There were bad aspects bud Colts game plan was terrible so we can/try to ignore those.

0 points
0
0
splitpea1's picture

September 16, 2024 at 11:13 am

Willis proved the doubters wrong (at least for one game so far), so Gute should be included in the "awesome" department for acquiring him at a bargain price.

Hopefully we'll see the more aggressive Hafley defense as promised when we face a more stationary QB next time around.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 11:28 am

Talk to me when Willis is given a normal NFL game plan.

He did well with what he was asked to do. I agree with that.

However, so many comments about how he was in full command of the offense? Silliness. I appreciate he was able to handle what was asked of him on short notice, but if / when he is tasked with being the driving force of the offense (like every other qb in the nfl is) , I have serious reservations about his ability to deliver.

watch the film. You will be hard pressed to find many examples of Willis looking away from his first read.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

September 16, 2024 at 11:38 am

You want him to be Brock Purdy. He's not. Willis has more arm talent and better legs. He's more Geno Smith early career than Aaron Rodgers, but nonetheless, he won his first game out of the shute, with 3 weeks in the play book. That you expect him to process that and assume positions that aren't realistic is your shortcoming, not his.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 01:14 pm

Bitternotsour,

With all due respect, I'm talking about Willis' lack of FUNDAMENTAL QB SKILLS. I'm not talking about Brock Purdy. I'm talking about skills that every #2 / #3 QB in the league possess. Skills that most QBs have by the time they've come off a redshirt year in college.

Every NFL team expects their QBs- ALL OF THEM- to go through their progressions. To understand and read defensive fronts and coverages.

I'm not talking about Willis' having a complete grasp of all the play checks, audibles, etc and so forth. I'm not talking about Willis directing the offense at the LOS and making on the fly adjustments. I'm talking about the ability to actually execute a basic pass play the way every NFL QB is expected to be able to. You have to be able to get through your reads. You will not survive in the NFL as a viable backup QB in this league if don't possess that ability. It's a basic requirement for the job. Willis doesn't have it. MLF knows it. They're doing what they can to protect him from those weaknesses.

Look, you can make me the bad guy, you can frame this as my having 'unrealistic expectations', whatever. Just don't be shocked when Willis is out of the league in 2 years.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 16, 2024 at 02:10 pm

Willis passed a lot of important tests in his Packers debut. He was calm, he handled the ball cleanly, he appeared to know exactly what to do on every play (at least as far as I could see), and his throws were accurate. (The deep pass to Romeo Doubs was a bit underthrown, but those passes often are, and a receiver of Doubs's caliber is expected to go up and get that ball most of the time--which is exactly what he did.) You are correct, however, that Willis's ability to go through progressions was not really put to the test. What remains to be seen was whether this was due to Matt LaFleur being super cautious with his new QB or Willis having very poor ability in this area. He will be tested when he faces a defense that does not allow the Packers to run all over them. That could happen on Sunday.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:02 pm

GregC:

"What remains to be seen was whether this was due to Matt LaFleur being super cautious with his new QB or Willis having very poor ability in this area."

I have watched about 2 or 3 hours worth of Willis tape covering highlights from his time at Liberty, preseason with TEN, an NFL start with TEN, etc.. This is why since the Packers acquired Willis, I have been warning people of his inability to get through progression.

I can say with confidence, this has nothing to do with MLF's gameplan. It's a weakness of Willis' game. It existed long before Sunday. There's actually some evidence he's improved slightly in that area during this last preseason with TEN; but it's still woefully sub par. It is highly unlikely to get much better at this point in his development. It's a skill that should have been honed 6-8 years ago.

0 points
0
0
13TimeChamps's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:34 pm

Please don't take this the wrong way. But you seem almost obsessed with trying to convince everyone that Malik Willis is a waste of time and will be out of the league in 2 years.

My question is what is your background in player evaluation? Serious question. You say you watched 2 or 3 hours of his tape. When fans say they are "studying film" or "tape" on a player, isn't that just watching highlights on youtube?

I'm curious how you have come to this conclusion that he isn't an NFL QB after a couple of hours watching his "tape". I'm not trying to pile on. I'm just curious how you've become so convinced.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 08:05 pm

I'm just a fan, but i've watched football closely for 50 years, give or take.

Over the last decade, i've spent a good deal of time watching how professionals break down QB play. Anyone can do this, the resources are there.

Watch Aaron Rodgers or Jordan Love.. or any NFL QB for that matter, play the QB position. Watch where their eyes go. Now watch Malik Willis.

You cannot stare down the primary read down in and down out in the NFL and be a viable NFL QB. I don't want you to take this the wrong way, but this is such a basic assessment I don't understand how people are confounded by this. Watch the tape with a critical eye on Willis- any of his tape- and you can see he consistently neglects to work through the progression.

I'm convinced because the film shows it. When everyone is saying 1+1 = 3, I feel the need to be the voice of reason.

Again, I sure hope I'm wrong, but I'm convinced I'm not.

0 points
0
0
13TimeChamps's picture

September 16, 2024 at 08:31 pm

Fair enough. I appreciate your passion. But we're talking about a back-up QB that we acquired for a 7th round draft pick. Maybe that's the voice of reason here. He's not the future of the franchise. He's a back-up. Hopefully, he will show more promise than Scott Tolzien, Graham Harrell, DeShone Kizer, et.al.

Relax. Did I mention he's a back-up?

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 10:03 pm

graham Harrell is one I forgot about, lol.

Re: he's the back up.

That does concern me, because I feel we had two better options- not great options, but better options- for long term development into viable NFL backup QBs. I feel that the smart play is to put your effort into developing the younger QB who have a foundation that could end up being viable, full service QBs down the road. I feel that Malik Willis lacks fundamentals despite having extremely attractive physical attributes, and a player like Willis should be the developmental player on the PS, or a luxury player you use in specific gadget plays- but I don't think it's the right call making him your active roster backup QB. Just my opinion.

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

September 17, 2024 at 09:18 am

We have one of those young developmental potentially full-service QBs you want already on the PS. I'm convinced that if we had started him (or Pratt, for that matter) yesterday we lose the game. Clifford's an interception machine at this point.

0 points
0
0
Cartwright's picture

September 17, 2024 at 03:45 am

With Malik, if the game plan has to be first read, check down or run then so be it. We have the running back in Jacobs, the TE in Kraft and the QB to execute a game plan like that, toss in a bomb play to Watson if Malik sees 8 ganged up in the box and for a game or two or three it might work if the Packers get the blocking. Based on your take I can see why he didn't stay in the pocket for long. GBG

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 16, 2024 at 03:58 pm

It's hard to say he doesn't have the "ability to actually execute a basic pass play" when he went 12-14 for 122 yards, 8.1 YPA and a rating of 126.8. That a higher YPA than Joe Burrow had yesterday.

You might be right that he'll be out of the league in two years, but this kind of efficient passing along with his ability to run make him a better backup QB option than GB. has had in a LONG time.

0 points
0
0
Minniman's picture

September 17, 2024 at 03:20 pm

I will say that he looked better as the game progressed - but that may have been because of the scoreboard...... and GB's obvious run first strategy.

I'm interested to see how he goes with a season of Tom Clements tuition.

For anyone that's interested, JT O'Sullivan's The QB School YouTube series did an analysis of Malik Willis' game. It's a great watch (from an ex NFL QB). Maybe he has a "Rasul Douglas" moment and steps up his work on his mental game?

FWIW the most important statistic was the W - Packers aren't in the hole 0-2

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

September 16, 2024 at 04:55 pm

Wow. So somehow, Malik Willis, who got recruited to the SEC, transferred to Liberty a division 1 school and by whose youtube highlights tape shows him head and shoulders above anyone in the Big South athletic conference, shows him reading defenses, shows him selecting and hitting receivers with frequency and with otherworldly arm talent and speed. Willis who somehow (apparently accidentally) got himself an invite to the combine, mentions as a dark-horse candidate for the first round, and eventually lands an early third round draft slot, this guy, is too stupid or unable to read a defense? Jesus man, get off the horse. He didn't get recruited to play safety or running back. He's a quarterback, with quarterbacking skills and he's a far sight better than Clifford who morons on this board were clamoring to replace Love in week 5 last year. All I can say is this is a sweet win, and that kid got himself a game ball from his head coach and the respect of his teammates.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:29 pm

Sorry, dude. You just don't get it, and I can't help you get it.

He has had success in lower levels of the game because he was a superior athlete. He has a big arm, he is a threat with the ball in his hands as a runner. What he has never developed is basic fundamental QB skills that are required to succeed at the professional level. His tape shows clearly he struggles to read coverage, and shows a complete failure to go through progression. Willis drops back, stares down the #1 and waits for him to break free. If he doesn't, he tucks and runs. That's what his college tape shows. It's clear as day. It's also worth noting he was running an elementary passing offense at Liberty. They kept it simple for him. What was impressive on Sunday was Willis curbed his urge to run. Frankly, that was more of a nod to MLF and the receiving corps in making sure Willis didn't have to leave the #1 option too frequently. He did check it down to Kraft on a few occasions, so that was nice.

I agree that there were indeed 'morons' who clamored for Clifford to replace love. I'd also like to see a show of hands from all of the 7-10 people who are downvoting my assessment of Malik Willis' talent: How many of you thought Tim Boyle should have been handed the reigns over Love? Thought he was a starting caliber QB who was being held back by the Packers? Kurt Benkert? Danny Etling? McGough?

With that being said, Clifford is a much more fundamentally sound QB than Willis. Period. Willis has great ball carrier skills and a rocket arm. Unfortunately, Willis lacks base level recognition and qb skills to capitalize on that rocket arm at the professional level. Again.. being a superior athlete was enough at the college level. This is the NFL. Willis ain't it. Good young man, great athlete. He's not an NFL QB. We'll agree to disagree.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

September 16, 2024 at 10:41 pm

Here's what you don't seem to get. People whose livelihoods actually depend on their talent evaluations have already spoken. They opted to upend the quarterback room to improve it, and their evaluations have just been proven correct in a real world application.

It's no longer theoretic at this point, Malik Willis is 1-0 as the quarterback of the Green Bay Packers. Somehow and not by accident he led Liberty to a 10-1 record, beat SEC teams, and won two bowl games. His pro day was attended by 120 NFL scouts and front office personnel. Apparently they saw something that you "don't seem to see"

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 17, 2024 at 07:21 am

I see it. He's an explosive runner and has a cannon arm.

He also doesn't have sound, basic QB fundamentals.

There's a reason why the Titans, who dropped a 3rd round pick on Willis in 2022, let him go to the Packers for a 7th round pick. It's because they spent two years trying to develop Willis, and decided he wasn't going to win their back up QB position.. and the Packers made an offer.

There's a reason the Packers got Willis for only a 7th round pick. It's because the other 118 NFL scouts and front office personnel that attended his pro day- and more importantly, all 31 other departments of pro personnel in the league- didn't make any offers.

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

September 17, 2024 at 09:26 am

There's a reason the Atlanta Falcons were hap-hap-happily ecstatic to drop a second round pick to the Packers for a first-rounder. Ol' Jerry Glanville dancing in his office when Ron Wolf traded for Brett Favre. It was POOR PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT.

Saying that the Titans shipped off Willis "because they spent two years trying to develop Willis, and decided he wasn't going to win their back up QB position." doesn't mean that they're correct in their assessment. Given who their starter is and how extremely shitty he's played this year, I'm of the opinion that their QB coaching is terrible.

I'm not saying that Willis is a future HOFer, but blaming a player for what could be an abysmally poor team decision is ridiculous.

"There's a reason the Packers got Willis for only a 7th round pick. It's because the other 118 NFL scouts and front office personnel that attended his pro day- and more importantly, all 31 other departments of pro personnel in the league- didn't make any offers.:

False equivalence, and again, blaming the player. Trading for someone who's going to be cut isn't very common in the league, and not a ton of teams needed backups that late in TC. The Packers could've waited, but he may - or may not - have cleared waivers.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 17, 2024 at 05:22 pm

You caught me red handed, blaming a player for his talent deficiency. You got me.

0 points
0
0
jwood3030's picture

September 16, 2024 at 06:51 pm

Oppy,

I agreed entirely with your first post here, but I think you went to far with this addition.

Willis did what was asked of him yesterday, and he did it very well. But it was not an NFL game plan and it did not show he can read a defense and go through his progressions to make the right decision. I agree with all that.

However, when you extrapolate that to "Willis doesn't have it" and claim that MLF was covering up his weakness, you have gone past the evidence. I think MLF didn't ask for more yesterday because he didn't need it and there was no reason to take a chance in that game. None of us know how much Willis has improved since his starts as a rookie, and we don't know how much he will improve with MLF's system.

I am happy that they scraped out a win without Love, and I expect that next week we will see more of what we have in Willis. For now I remain hopeful that he can and will improve, but Greg Olsens claim that 'the Packers have found their backup QB' is just as off target as you giving up on him.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:38 pm

That's a fair and level headed response, jwood3030.

That being said, I don't see the marked improvement. I watched all of his preseason snaps. Is he better in his areas of weakness than he was as a rookie? Yeah, I think so, but not to a large degree IMO. This is year three and he's working on trying to acquire fundamental QB skills that most players have in college.

I believe what the tape tells me, and I also believe the Tennessee Titans who traded away a player they spent a 3rd round pick on less than 3 years ago for a 7th round pick because he wasn't going to win the backup QB position.

Is there a chance Malik Willis is the next Kurt Warner? I guess there's always the possibility he's a late bloomer and the Packers are just smarter than the other teams in the NFL, but I wouldn't bet on it.

0 points
0
0
jwood3030's picture

September 17, 2024 at 08:23 am

Thanks Oppy,

It was certainly in my head that the Titans had every opportunity to make the better assessment, although I didn't watch all the preseason snaps and I don't know if they just felt they had better options so they didn't need Willis any more.

I don't think the Packers need Willis to be Kurt Warner. He doesn't need to magically become the best QB in the league. If he can just be Justin Fields to get through a few games until Love gets back it will be a huge win.

0 points
0
0
jurp's picture

September 17, 2024 at 09:31 am

You seriously think the TItans know what they're doing with QBs after watching Levis shit the bed the last two weeks? Over-drafted and apparently over-rated, and starting only because of his draft position. How is his reading his receivers? Progressions? Great? And right now he's a disaster waiting to happen when he's pressured. Perhaps he'll get better (they better hope so), but if not the GM is on the streets at the end of the season

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 17, 2024 at 05:25 pm

I'm sorry Mr. Willis, I will try to be more kind when assessing your son's QB talent.

0 points
0
0
Mister Chievous's picture

September 16, 2024 at 06:32 pm

arm talent? for a QB, brain thinking and eye vision is more important.

0 points
0
0
Bitternotsour's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:00 pm

tell it to Brett Favre

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:14 pm

Terry Bradshaw would also like ah, um, a something.

0 points
0
0
Oppy's picture

September 16, 2024 at 07:41 pm

You have to have the foundation to utilize the arm talent.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 17, 2024 at 08:53 am

You have to have a measure of both. I will say that what really impressed me was how calm Willis was in the pocket and at key moments like the puke ball and the throwaway instead of trying to force it in the red zone. That was not the Willis on film from 2 years ago.

0 points
0
0
TK_CA's picture

September 16, 2024 at 11:16 am

Correction. The missed FG would have put them up 16, not 17. But that would still have required 2 TDs, 2 two-point conversions, and then another score (probably in overtime) to beat the Packers. Instead, 2 vanilla TDs+extras would have won the day, and Indy got halfway there.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

September 16, 2024 at 01:02 pm

Welcome to WI! Good to have another TK here!

0 points
0
0
LeotisHarris's picture

September 16, 2024 at 01:26 pm

You should lawyer-up, man. That's a Spirit vs. Led Zeppelin-like infringement right there. Did you have worldwide locked down? Yes! Is CA part of the world? Yes! Case. Effing, Closed.

0 points
0
0
greengold's picture

September 16, 2024 at 01:28 pm

I can buy some of that.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

September 16, 2024 at 03:10 pm

High-Lair!

0 points
0
0
Houndog's picture

September 16, 2024 at 02:19 pm

TK-CA,
I'm near Santa Cruz, where you at?

0 points
0
0
Mister Chievous's picture

September 16, 2024 at 06:35 pm

I used to work with a guy in San Leandro named tk back in the 80's. are you that guy? go banana slugs!

0 points
0
0
dblbogey's picture

September 16, 2024 at 12:49 pm

Love the win. Lot's of good stuff. But I disagree about the story about how good our defense was. 3 interceptions, a bunch of really bad throws by the Colts, two critical dropped passes by the colts. I don't think our defense stopped them so much as Indy was really inept. Before we get too excited about the running game, remember Indy got gashed by the run last week too. I think we have a very talented team, but there's a lot of room for improvement. Looking forward to seeing it happen.

0 points
0
0
TKWorldWide's picture

September 16, 2024 at 12:57 pm

Indy knew the run was coming and still got gashed. If I’m a Colts fan, I’m really upset.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 16, 2024 at 04:00 pm

If you can hold an NFL team to 10 points, that's a decent stat for a defense right there. That same offense scored 27 against HOU last week, so GB did some things right for sure.

0 points
0
0
joejetson's picture

September 16, 2024 at 01:11 pm

I miss Aaron Jones but there's no way he holds up to the amount of carries Jacobs has had.
We'll see over the long haul how the switch to Jacobs pans out. So far, so good.
Not happy about the fumble at the goal line, though.

0 points
0
0
GregC's picture

September 16, 2024 at 02:37 pm

Agreed. It's not just Jacobs' ability to handle a lot of carries but also his power running style that was a better fit than Aaron Jones's skillset for this kind of game. I was excited to see the Packers have so much success with all those straight-ahead runs.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 16, 2024 at 04:01 pm

Apparently, our beloved #33 was already in the medical tent during yesterday's game. Plus, Jones fumbled at the one-yard line.

0 points
0
0
WestCoastPackerBacker's picture

September 16, 2024 at 04:19 pm

Aaron Jones had a goal line fumble yesterday as well.

0 points
0
0
Coldworld's picture

September 17, 2024 at 08:59 am

Jones has fumbled at a much higher rate in the last three years to last weekend per statuses. Just under one every 70 touches. Jacobs is one per a little over 90. Both are above league average of about 115 touches.

The fumble rate has dropped precipitously in the league from about one in 40 touches in the 70s. A lot of that is rule changes and the move from run first defending too.

0 points
0
0
MitchAnthony's picture

September 16, 2024 at 09:32 pm

The biggest improvement within the team as a skill position this season is appearing to be at the safety position. Now that being said it has only been two games but still, the safety play is much better than before.

I'd like to see how much better the linebackers could be with some more snap counts for the rookies or maybe getting Wrong Way Quay into a better position to succeed. There are 15 more games to go this year for him to improve upon but right now it ain't looking like his 5 year option will be worth picking up.

0 points
0
0